Literature DB >> 24629625

Generating finite element models of the knee: How accurately can we determine ligament attachment sites from MRI scans?

H H Rachmat1, D Janssen2, W J Zevenbergen3, G J Verkerke4, R L Diercks5, N Verdonschot6.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the intra- and inter-observer variability when determining the insertion and origin sites of knee ligaments on MRI scan images. We collected data of five observers with different backgrounds, who determined the ligament attachment sites in an MRI scan of a right knee of a 66-year-old male cadaver donor. We evaluated the intra- and inter-observer differences between the ligament attachment center points, and also determined the differences relative to a physical measurement performed on the same cadaver. The largest mean intra- and inter-observer differences were 4.30mm (ACL origin) and 16.81mm (superficial MCL insertion), respectively. Relative to the physical measurement, the largest intra- and inter-observer differences were 31.84mm (superficial MCL insertion) and 23.39mm (deep MCL insertion), respectively. The results indicate that, dependent on the location, a significant variation can occur when identifying the attachment site of the knee ligaments. This finding is of particular importance when creating computational models based on MRI data, as the variations in attachment sites may have a considerable effect on the biomechanical behavior of the human knee joint.
Copyright © 2014 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attachment sites; Knee; Ligament; MRI scan; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629625     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

1.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Overall Strategy.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Thor F Besier; Jason P Halloran; Carl W Imhauser; Peter J Laz; Tina M Morrison; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Assessment of knee collateral ligament stiffness by strain ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Surangika Wadugodapitiya; Makoto Sakamoto; Masaei Tanaka; Yuta Sakagami; Yusuke Morise; Koichi Kobayashi
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.234

4.  Proposal of a magnetic resonance technique for the evaluation of the calcaneofibular ligament minimizing false positive results.

Authors:  Ibevan A Nogueira; Annie F Frère; Alessandro P Silva; Terigi A Scardovelli; Silvia Rms Boschi; Heverton C Oliveira
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Biomechanical Study of a Tricompartmental Unloader Brace for Patellofemoral or Multicompartment Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Chris A McGibbon; Scott Brandon; Emily L Bishop; Chris Cowper-Smith; Edmund N Biden
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Elongation Patterns of the Collateral Ligaments After Total Knee Arthroplasty Are Dominated by the Knee Flexion Angle.

Authors:  Seyyed Hamed Hosseini Nasab; Colin R Smith; Pascal Schütz; Barbara Postolka; Renate List; William R Taylor
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-12

7.  Length-Change Patterns of the Collateral Ligaments During Functional Activities After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  S H Hosseini Nasab; C R Smith; P Schütz; P Damm; A Trepczynski; R List; W R Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.934

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.