Literature DB >> 24629542

Accelerometer use during field-based physical activity research in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.

Arlene M McGarty1, Victoria Penpraze2, Craig A Melville3.   

Abstract

Many methodological questions and issues surround the use of accelerometers as a measure of physical activity during field-based research. To ensure overall research quality and the accuracy of results, methodological decisions should be based on study research questions. This paper aims to systematically review accelerometer use during field-based research in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, PsycINFO, PubMed, and a thesis database (up to May 2013) were searched to identify relevant articles. Articles which used accelerometry-based monitors, quantified activity levels, and included ambulatory children and adolescents (≤ 18 years) with intellectual disabilities were included. Based on best practice guidelines, a form was developed to extract data based on 17 research components of accelerometer use. The search identified 429 articles. Ten full-text articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Many shortcomings in accelerometer use were identified, with the percentage of review criteria met ranging from 12% to 47%. Various methods of accelerometer use were reported, with most use decisions not based on population-specific research. However, a lack of measurement research, e.g., calibration/validation, for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities is limiting the ability of field-based researchers to make to the most appropriate accelerometer use decisions. The methods of accelerometer use employed can have significant effects on the quality and validity of results produced, which researchers should be more aware of. To allow informed use decisions, there should be a greater focus on measurement research related to children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometers; Intellectual disabilities; Physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629542     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  15 in total

1.  The feasibility of using pedometers for self-report of steps and accelerometers for measuring physical activity in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities across an 18-month intervention.

Authors:  L T Ptomey; E A Willis; J Lee; R A Washburn; C A Gibson; J J Honas; J E Donnelly
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2017-08

2.  Individual and family-based approaches to increase physical activity in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Rationale and design for an 18 month randomized trial.

Authors:  L T Ptomey; R A Washburn; J Lee; J L Greene; A N Szabo-Reed; J R Sherman; J C Danon; L N Osborne; T D Little; J E Donnelly
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Does physical activity differ between youth with and without intellectual disabilities?

Authors:  Heidi I Stanish; Carol Curtin; Aviva Must; Sarah Phillips; Melissa Maslin; Linda G Bandini
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 2.554

4.  A comparison of accelerometer cut-points for measuring physical activity and sedentary time in adolescents with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Bethany Forseth; Jordan A Carlson; Erik A Willis; Brian C Helsel; Lauren T Ptomey
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2021-11-24

5.  Intrapersonal, interpersonal and environmental correlates of moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  L T Ptomey; B C Helsel; D A White; J Lee; J R Sherman; R A Washburn; A M Gorczyca; J E Donnelly
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2022-02-21

6.  Changes in physical activity across a 6-month weight loss intervention in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  L T Ptomey; J Lee; D A White; B C Helsel; R A Washburn; J E Donnelly
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  Massage-like stroking boosts the immune system in mice.

Authors:  Benjamin Major; Lorenza Rattazzi; Samuel Brod; Ivan Pilipović; Gordana Leposavić; Fulvio D'Acquisto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Measurement method of magnetic field for the wire suspended micro-pendulum accelerometer.

Authors:  Yongle Lu; Leilei Li; Ning Hu; Yingjun Pan; Chunhua Ren
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Effects of smartphone diaries and personal dosimeters on behavior in a randomized study of methods to document sunlight exposure.

Authors:  Brian Køster; Jens Søndergaard; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Martin Allen; Mette Bjerregaard; Anja Olsen; Joan Bentzen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-04-22

10.  Feasibility of a laboratory-based accelerometer calibration protocol for children with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Arlene M McGarty; Victoria Penpraze; Craig A Melville
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.