Hiten D Patel1, Max Kates2, Phillip M Pierorazio2, Mohamad E Allaf3. 1. James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Concentration, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: hitenpatel@jhmi.edu. 2. James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD. 3. James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recognizing population-level disparities for the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) would inform clinical practice and health policy. Few studies, reporting conflicting results, have investigated race and sex disparities specifically among patients with small renal masses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (1995-2007) was queried for patients with localized T1a RCC undergoing radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy (PN), or deferred therapy (DT). Demographics, comorbidity, and treatment approach were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated predictors of DT and then PN among those receiving surgery. Cox proportional hazards model evaluated survival differences for whites vs. blacks and women vs. men. RESULTS: A total of 6,092 white and 617 black patients with T1a RCC met the inclusion criteria. Blacks were twice as likely to defer therapy compared with whites (odds ratio = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.52-2.51) and had worse overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.19-1.56). However, cancer-specific survival (CSS) was similar (P = 0.429). The greatest discrepancy was among healthy (Charlson comorbidity index≤1) blacks who had a much higher rate of DT compared with their white counterparts. Women were found to have decreased use of PN compared with men (odds ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96) and better CSS (hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94), but there were no differences by race. CONCLUSIONS: The differential use of DT by race instead of purely by age and comorbidity is concerning but has not led to a significant difference in CSS. Women are less likely to undergo PN compared with men, but they also have a notably improved CSS.
OBJECTIVES: Recognizing population-level disparities for the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) would inform clinical practice and health policy. Few studies, reporting conflicting results, have investigated race and sex disparities specifically among patients with small renal masses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (1995-2007) was queried for patients with localized T1aRCC undergoing radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy (PN), or deferred therapy (DT). Demographics, comorbidity, and treatment approach were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated predictors of DT and then PN among those receiving surgery. Cox proportional hazards model evaluated survival differences for whites vs. blacks and women vs. men. RESULTS: A total of 6,092 white and 617 black patients with T1aRCC met the inclusion criteria. Blacks were twice as likely to defer therapy compared with whites (odds ratio = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.52-2.51) and had worse overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.19-1.56). However, cancer-specific survival (CSS) was similar (P = 0.429). The greatest discrepancy was among healthy (Charlson comorbidity index≤1) blacks who had a much higher rate of DT compared with their white counterparts. Women were found to have decreased use of PN compared with men (odds ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96) and better CSS (hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94), but there were no differences by race. CONCLUSIONS: The differential use of DT by race instead of purely by age and comorbidity is concerning but has not led to a significant difference in CSS. Women are less likely to undergo PN compared with men, but they also have a notably improved CSS.
Authors: Maxine Sun; Firas Abdollah; Marco Bianchi; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Rodolphe Thuret; Zhe Tian; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jeffrey M Woldrich; Katherine Mallin; Jamie Ritchey; Peter R Carroll; Christopher J Kane Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Hiten D Patel; Jeffrey K Mullins; Phillip M Pierorazio; Gautam Jayram; Jason E Cohen; Brian R Matlaga; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: David C Miller; Christopher S Saigal; Joan L Warren; Meryl Leventhal; Dennis Deapen; Mousumi Banerjee; Julie Lai; Jan Hanley; Mark S Litwin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Michael A Liss; Song Wang; Kerrin Palazzi; Ramzi Jabaji; Nishant Patel; Hak J Lee; J Kellogg Parsons; Ithaar H Derweesh Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 2.264