Literature DB >> 24629454

Perforator flaps--how many perforators are necessary to keep a flap alive?

Andreas M Fichter1, Anna Borgmann1, Lucas M Ritschl1, David A Mitchell1, Stefan Wagenpfeil2, Ulf Dornseifer1, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff1, Thomas Mücke3.   

Abstract

Perforator flaps are becoming increasingly important in reconstructive microsurgery because of their reduced donor-site morbidity. However, one drawback is partial necrosis caused by vasospasm or inconsistency of delicate perforator vessels. In this study we have evaluated the number and capacity of perforator vessels with respect to the size of a flap, and the influence of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on the capacity of perforators in a standard animal model. We realised an epigastric perforator flap 4cm×7cm in 36 rats. In 3 control groups (n=6 in each), flaps were raised based on 4, 2, or 1 perforator vessel(s), while all other perforators as well as the epigastric vessels were ligated. In three study groups (n=6 in each), set up in the same way as the control groups, we also injected a single dose of VEGF into the wound area. After one week, all areas of necrosis were assessed planimetrically. We also evaluated the wounds by laser Doppler flowmetry preoperatively and after one week, and by histological and immunohistochemical examination. An increased number of perforators, together with VEGF, was associated with a significant reduction in the areas of necrosis. This observation was particularly true in flaps based on only one perforator. The inclusion of additional perforators has a more important role in the success of a flap than theoretical models suggest. Proangiogenetic factors may improve the viability of perforator flaps.
Copyright © 2014 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Area of necrosis; Epigastric flap model; Laser Doppler flowmetry; Perforator flap; Vascular endothelial growth factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629454     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  3 in total

1.  Impact of different antithrombotics on the microcirculation and viability of perforator-based ischaemic skin flaps in a small animal model.

Authors:  Andreas M Fichter; Lucas M Ritschl; Luisa K Robitzky; Stefan Wagenpfeil; David A Mitchell; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Thomas Mücke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Effects of endothelial defects and venous interposition grafts on the acute incidence of thrombus formation within microvascular procedures.

Authors:  Andreas M Fichter; Thomas Mücke; Lucas M Ritschl; Marie-Kristin Hofmann; Constantin T Wolff; Leonard H Schmidt; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Development of an Extracorporeal Perfusion Device for Small Animal Free Flaps.

Authors:  Andreas M Fichter; Lucas M Ritschl; Anna Borgmann; Martin Humbs; Peter B Luppa; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Thomas Mücke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.