Nan Cheng1, Changqing Gao2, Ming Yang1, Yang Wu1, Gang Wang1, Cangsong Xiao1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: gchq301@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Robotic cardiac surgery has been proved safe and feasible in dedicated centers. We systematically analyzed the learning curve issues associated with totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) using a stepwise approach by a single surgeon who had successfully performed >650 cases of various types of robotic cardiac surgery at our single center. METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2013, 230 patients underwent robotic coronary bypass grafting on the beating heart. Of these patients, 90 had successfully undergone beating heart TECAB using the da Vinci S/Si Surgical System without conversion to sternotomy. All beating heart TECAB procedures were completed using the following modules: endoscopic left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting, pericardiotomy and target vessel identification, and anastomosis of the LITA to the target vessel. The perioperative outcomes were compared among 3 quintiles of 30 consecutive patients each and the learning curve results were evaluated. RESULTS: No in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity occurred. The comparison among the 3 quintiles showed a significant decrease in operative time (P=.000), LITA harvesting time (P=.037), and anastomotic time (P=.000). A significant learning curve was observed for the operative time [y(min)=223-17×ln(x); r2=0.217, P=.000]; LITA harvesting time [y(min)=37-3×ln(x); r2=0.097, P=.003]; and LITA-left anterior descending artery anastomotic time [y(min)=18-2×ln(x); r2=0.298, P=.000]. No differences were found in the mean transit flow (P=.102) or perioperative complications among the 3 quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Modular-based TECAB procedures can be successfully performed; however, each module has a steep learning curve. A stable and well-trained robotic cardiac team and an experienced cardiac surgeon can achieve good, reproducible results after this substantial learning curve.
BACKGROUND: Robotic cardiac surgery has been proved safe and feasible in dedicated centers. We systematically analyzed the learning curve issues associated with totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) using a stepwise approach by a single surgeon who had successfully performed >650 cases of various types of robotic cardiac surgery at our single center. METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2013, 230 patients underwent robotic coronary bypass grafting on the beating heart. Of these patients, 90 had successfully undergone beating heart TECAB using the da Vinci S/Si Surgical System without conversion to sternotomy. All beating heart TECAB procedures were completed using the following modules: endoscopic left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting, pericardiotomy and target vessel identification, and anastomosis of the LITA to the target vessel. The perioperative outcomes were compared among 3 quintiles of 30 consecutive patients each and the learning curve results were evaluated. RESULTS: No in-hospital mortality or severe morbidity occurred. The comparison among the 3 quintiles showed a significant decrease in operative time (P=.000), LITA harvesting time (P=.037), and anastomotic time (P=.000). A significant learning curve was observed for the operative time [y(min)=223-17×ln(x); r2=0.217, P=.000]; LITA harvesting time [y(min)=37-3×ln(x); r2=0.097, P=.003]; and LITA-left anterior descending artery anastomotic time [y(min)=18-2×ln(x); r2=0.298, P=.000]. No differences were found in the mean transit flow (P=.102) or perioperative complications among the 3 quintiles. CONCLUSIONS: Modular-based TECAB procedures can be successfully performed; however, each module has a steep learning curve. A stable and well-trained robotic cardiac team and an experienced cardiac surgeon can achieve good, reproducible results after this substantial learning curve.
Authors: Christopher Cao; Praveen Indraratna; Mathew Doyle; David H Tian; Kevin Liou; Stine Munkholm-Larsen; Ciska Uys; Sohaib Virk Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2016-11
Authors: William L Patrick; Amit Iyengar; Jason J Han; Jarvis C Mays; Mark Helmers; John J Kelly; Xingmei Wang; Mehrdad Ghoreishi; Bradley S Taylor; Pavan Atluri; Nimesh D Desai; Matthew L Williams Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2021-08-29 Impact factor: 1.778
Authors: Nan Cheng; Huajun Zhang; Ming Yang; Guopeng Liu; Yi Guo; Wenbin Kang; Changqing Gao; Rong Wang Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2021-06-28