Literature DB >> 24629037

The straight to test endoscopy service for suspected colorectal cancer: meeting national targets but are we meeting our patients' expectations?

C R Hitchins1, A Lawn, G Whitehouse, M R McFall.   

Abstract

AIM: The NHS Cancer Plan describes initiatives to improve patient care in the UK, including the two-week rule cancer referral pathway. To meet this target a straight to test (STT) endoscopy service was devised to expedite diagnosis of suspected colorectal cancer. Our novel study aimed to determine patient satisfaction with this new approach to rapid access investigation.
METHOD: An anonymized questionnaire was posted to 300 patients who had undergone STT endoscopy in our unit between January and June 2010. It assessed satisfaction with the service overall, time from referral to investigation, pre-test information, bowel preparation instructions and time to results as well as preference for a traditional pre-test or post-test outpatient appointment and awareness that the referral was for suspected bowel cancer.
RESULTS: In all, 174 questionnaires were obtained (58% yield; mean age 68.8; 44.8% men). 82.2% of patients were 'very satisfied' with the service overall, 82.8% with time from referral to test, 75.2% with time from test to results, 73% with endoscopy information and 69.5% with bowel preparation instructions. Eight per cent would rather have seen a specialist prior to endoscopy, 31.6% would have preferred a post-test appointment and 68.4% of patients were aware that referral was for suspected bowel cancer.
CONCLUSION: Straight to test is popular with patients. It offers a fast and cost effective service in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and meets national targets whilst reducing the volume burden on outpatient clinics. However, its success heavily relies on accurate communication between general practitioner, patient and secondary care. Colorectal Disease
© 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; colorectal cancer; patient satisfaction; two week wait

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629037     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

1.  Trends in urgent referrals for suspected colorectal cancer: an increase in quantity, but not in quality.

Authors:  P Vulliamy; S McCluney; S Raouf; S Banerjee
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Alice C Tompson; Nicholas Jones; Josh Brewin; Elizabeth A Spencer; Clare R Bankhead; Fd Richard Hobbs; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Prevalence of pelvic floor symptoms in female patients attending the two-week wait clinic with suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Bennett; A Greenwood; P Durdey; D Glancy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Over-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking.

Authors:  Cristina Renzi; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.