Literature DB >> 24628751

Reduction of admit wait times: the effect of a leadership-based program.

Pankaj B Patel1, Mary A Combs, David R Vinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prolonged admit wait times in the emergency department (ED) for patients who require hospitalization lead to increased boarding time in the ED, a significant cause of ED congestion. This is associated with decreased quality of care, higher morbidity and mortality, decreased patient satisfaction, increased costs for care, ambulance diversion, higher numbers of patients who leave without being seen (LWBS), and delayed care with longer lengths of stay (LOS) for other ED patients. The objective was to assess the effect of a leadership-based program to expedite hospital admissions from the ED.
METHODS: This before-and-after observational study was undertaken from 2006 through 2011 at one community hospital ED. A team of ED and hospital leaders implemented a program to reduce admit wait times, using a computerized hospital-wide tracking system to monitor inpatient and ED bed status. The team collaboratively and consistently moved ED patients to their inpatient beds within an established goal of 60 minutes after an admission decision was reached. Top leadership actively intervened in real time by contacting staff whenever delays occurred to expedite immediate solutions to achieve the 60-minute goal. The primary outcome measures were the percentage of ED patients who were admitted to inpatient beds within 60 minutes from the time the beds were requested and ED boarding time. LOS, patient satisfaction, LWBS rate, and ambulance diversion hours were also measured.
RESULTS: After ED census, hospital admission rates, and ED bed capacity were controlled for using a multivariable linear regression analysis, the admit wait time reduction program contributed to an increase in patients being admitted to the hospital within 60 minutes by 16 percentage points (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 10 to 22 points; p < 0.0001) and a decrease in boarding time per admission of 46 minutes (95% CI = 63 to 82 minutes; p < 0.0001). LOS decreased for admitted patients by 79 minutes (95% CI = 55 to 104 minutes; p < 0.0001), for discharged patients by 17 minutes (95% CI = 12 to 23 minutes; p < 0.0001), and for all patients by 34 minutes (95% CI = 25 to 43 minutes; p < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction increased 4.9 percentage points (95% CI = 3.8 to 6.0 points; p < 0.0001). LWBS patients decreased 0.9 percentage points (95% CI = 0.6 to 1.2 points; p < 0.0001) and monthly ambulance diversion decreased 8.2 hours (95% CI = 4.6 to 11.8 hours; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A leadership-based program to reduce admit wait times and boarding times was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of patients admitted to the hospital within 60 minutes and a significant decrease in boarding time. Also associated with the program were decreased ED LOS, LWBS rate, and ambulance diversion, as well as increased patient satisfaction.
© 2014 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24628751     DOI: 10.1111/acem.12327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  7 in total

1.  Regarding: effects of emergency department expansion on emergency department patient flow. In reply.

Authors:  Bryn E Mumma; James F Holmes
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Is Inpatient Volume Or Emergency Department Crowding A Greater Driver Of Ambulance Diversion?

Authors:  Renee Y Hsia; Nandita Sarkar; Yu-Chu Shen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Hip fracture management in the emergency department and its impact on hospital outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Chiann Ni Thiam; Hui Min Khor; Gordon Hwa Mang Pang; Wan Chieh Lim; Tharshne Shanmugam; C Sankara Kumar Chandrasekaran; Simmrat Singh; Mohd Idzwan Bin Zakaria; Terence Ong
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.269

4.  Impact of inpatient Care in Emergency Department on outcomes: a quasi-experimental cohort study.

Authors:  Aisha Lateef; Soo Hoon Lee; Dale Andrew Fisher; Wei-Ping Goh; Hui Fen Han; Uma Chandra Segara; Tiong Beng Sim; Malcolm Mahadehvan; Khean Teik Goh; Noel Cheah; Aymeric Y T Lim; Phillip H Phan; Reshma A Merchant
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Medical expertise as a critical influencing factor on the length of stay in the ED: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel Trotzky; Avishai M Tsur; Daniel E Fordham; Pinchas Halpern; Avinoah Ironi; Tomer Ziv-Baran; Aya Cohen; Lior Rozental; Jacob Or
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Emergency department performances during overcrowding: the experience of the health protection agency of Brianza.

Authors:  Emanuele Amodio; Luca Cavalieri d'Oro; Elisabetta Chiarazzo; Carlo Picco; Maurizio Migliori; Isabella Trezzi; Silvano Lopez; Oliviero Rinaldi; Massimo Giupponi
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2018-06-29

7.  Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.

Authors:  Claire Morley; Maria Unwin; Gregory M Peterson; Jim Stankovich; Leigh Kinsman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.