Literature DB >> 24628391

Reach out to one and you reach out to many: social touch affects third-party observers.

Annett Schirmer1, Christy Reece, Claris Zhao, Erik Ng, Esther Wu, Shih-Cheng Yen.   

Abstract

Casual social touch influences emotional perceptions, attitudes, and behaviours of interaction partners. We asked whether these influences extend to third-party observers. To this end, we developed the Social Touch Picture Set comprising line drawings of dyadic interactions, half of which entailed publicly acceptable casual touch and half of which served as no-touch controls. In Experiment 1, participants provided basic image norms by rating how frequently they observed a displayed touch gesture in everyday life and how comfortable they were observing it. Results implied that some touch gestures were observed more frequently and with greater comfort than others (e.g., handshake vs. hug). All gestures, however, obtained rating scores suitable for inclusion in Experiments 2 and 3. In Experiment 2, participants rated perceived valence, arousal, and likeability of randomly presented touch and no-touch images without being explicitly informed about touch. Image characters seemed more positive, aroused, and likeable when they touched as compared to when they did not touch. Image characters seemed more negative and aroused, but were equally likeable, when they received touch as compared to when there was no physical contact. In Experiment 3, participants passively viewed touch and no-touch images while their eye movements were recorded. Differential gazing at touch as compared to no-touch images emerged within the first 500 ms following image exposure and was largely restricted to the characters' upper body. Gazing at the touching body parts (e.g., hands) was minimal and largely unaffected by touch, suggesting that touch processing occurred outside the focus of visual attention. Together, these findings establish touch as an important visual cue and provide novel insights into how this cue modulates socio-emotional processing in third-party observers.
© 2014 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Midas effect; body contact; embodiment; eye-tracking; gender differences; tactile; vicarious

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24628391     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  6 in total

1.  The role of empathy in the neural responses to observed human social touch.

Authors:  Leehe Peled-Avron; Einat Levy-Gigi; Gal Richter-Levin; Nachshon Korem; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Emotion Perception from Face, Voice, and Touch: Comparisons and Convergence.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Subtle Contact Nuances in the Delivery of Human-to-Human Touch Distinguish Emotional Sentiment.

Authors:  Shan Xu; Chang Xu; Sarah McIntyre; Hakan Olausson; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Socio-affective touch expression database.

Authors:  Haemy Lee Masson; Hans Op de Beeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Heterosexual, gay, and lesbian people's reactivity to virtual caresses on their embodied avatars' taboo zones.

Authors:  Martina Fusaro; Matteo P Lisi; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The role of the inferior frontal gyrus in vicarious social touch: A transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study.

Authors:  Leehe Peled-Avron; Laura Glasner; Hila Z Gvirts; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 6.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.