Literature DB >> 24627967

Discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy over 12 months after acute coronary syndromes increases risk for adverse events in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fabrizio D'Ascenzo1, Francesco Colombo, Umberto Barbero, Claudio Moretti, Pierluigi Omedè, Matthew J Reed, Giuseppe Tarantini, Giacomo Frati, James J Di Nicolantonio, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Fiorenzo Gaita.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) hospitalization remains to be defined, both for patients treated medically and for those undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for studies including patients presenting with ACS, and treated either with DAPT longer than or shorter than 12 months. Multivariable-adjusted risk estimates for death and recurrent ACS with stopping DAPT after 12 months (odds ratios [OR] 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were pooled after logarithmic transformation according to random-effect models with inverse-variance weighting.
RESULTS: Five studies with 49,586 patients were included. Median age was 66 (64-67) years, with 67% (65-75) males. Myocardial infarction (MI) represented the admission diagnosis for 88% (60-100) of the patients, and 66% (50-74) were treated with stenting. After a follow-up of 2.1 years (1.5-2.7), 40% (35-46) still on DAPT after 12 months and the rates of death or recurrent ACS were 16.6 (14.5-17.0). Risk of adverse events for patients stopping DAPT after 1 year was significantly increased (OR = 1.19 [1.07-1.32]) for those receiving stents, but not for patients managed medically (OR = 1.13 [0.95-1.35]). The increased risk did not vary according to age, gender, myocardial infarction as admission diagnosis, and kind of stent.
CONCLUSIONS: Interruption of DAPT over 12 months after ACS increases the risk of adverse events for patients treated with PTCA, but not for those managed conservatively, independently from baseline features and admission diagnosis. This hypothesis-generating finding should be tested in randomized controlled trials.
© 2014, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627967     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  5 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous pleural drainage in patients taking clopidogrel: real danger or phantom fear?

Authors:  Katherine Linder; Oleg Epelbaum
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Gender differences with short-term vs 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with the COMBO dual therapy stent: 2-years follow-up results of the REDUCE trial.

Authors:  M Verdoia; H Suryapranata; S Damen; C Camaro; E Benit; L Barbieri; S Rasoul; H B Liew; J Polad; W A W Ahmad; R Zambahari; J Lalmand; R J van der Schaaf; T H Koh; P Timmermans; D Dilling-Boer; L F Veenstra; A W J Van't Hof; S W L Lee; V Roolvink; E Ligtenberg; S Postma; E J J Kolkman; M A Brouwer; E Kedhi; G De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  The prognostic impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity with aspirin or ADP receptor antagonists: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Umberto Barbero; Marta Bisi; Claudio Moretti; Pierluigi Omedè; Enrico Cerrato; Giorgio Quadri; Federico Conrotto; Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; James J DiNicolantonio; Mauro Gasparini; Sripal Bangalore; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Unfavourable risk factor control after coronary events in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Elise Sverre; Kari Peersen; Einar Husebye; Erik Gjertsen; Lars Gullestad; Torbjørn Moum; Jan Erik Otterstad; Toril Dammen; John Munkhaugen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Comparison of bioresorbable vs durable polymer drug-eluting stents in unprotected left main (from the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII Study).

Authors:  Mario Iannaccone; Umberto Barbero; Michele De Benedictis; Yoichi Imori; Giorgio Quadri; Daniela Trabattoni; Nicola Ryan; Giuseppe Venuti; Andrea Montabone; Wojciech Wojakowski; Andrea Rognoni; Gerard Helft; Radoslaw Parma; Leonardo De Luca; Michele Autelli; Giacomo Boccuzzi; Alessio Mattesini; Christian Templin; Enrico Cerrato; Wojciech Wańha; Grzegorz Smolka; Zenon Huczek; Francesco Tomassini; Bernardo Cortese; Davide Capodanno; Alaide Chieffo; Ivan Nuñez-Gil; Sebastiano Gili; Antonia Bassignana; Carlo di Mario; Baldassarre Doronzo; Pierluigi Omedè; Maurizio D'Amico; Delio Tedeschi; Ferdinando Varbella; Thomas Luscher; Imad Sheiban; Javier Escaned; Mauro Rinaldi; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.