Literature DB >> 24627480

Blockade of Fas signaling in breast cancer cells suppresses tumor growth and metastasis via disruption of Fas signaling-initiated cancer-related inflammation.

Qiuyan Liu1, Qinchun Tan2, Yuanyuan Zheng3, Kun Chen2, Cheng Qian3, Nan Li3, Qingqing Wang2, Xuetao Cao4.   

Abstract

Mechanisms for cancer-related inflammation remain to be fully elucidated. Non-apoptotic functions of Fas signaling have been proposed to play an important role in promoting tumor progression. It has yet to be determined if targeting Fas signaling can control tumor progression through suppression of cancer-related inflammation. In the current study we found that breast cancer cells with constitutive Fas expression were resistant to apoptosis induction by agonistic anti-Fas antibody (Jo2) ligation or Fas ligand cross-linking. Higher expression of Fas in human breast cancer tissue has been significantly correlated with poorer prognosis in breast cancer patients. To determine whether blockade of Fas signaling in breast cancer could suppress tumor progression, we prepared an orthotopic xenograft mouse model with mammary cancer cells 4T1 and found that blockade of Fas signaling in 4T1 cancer cells markedly reduced tumor growth, inhibited tumor metastasis in vivo, and prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice. Mechanistically, blockade of Fas signaling in cancer cells significantly decreased systemic or local recruitment of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in vivo. Furthermore, blockade of Fas signaling markedly reduced IL-6, prostaglandin E2 production from breast cancer cells by impairing p-p38, and activity of the NFκB pathway. In addition, administration of a COX-2 inhibitor and anti-IL-6 antibody significantly reduced MDSC accumulation in vivo. Therefore, blockade of Fas signaling can suppress breast cancer progression by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine production and MDSC accumulation, indicating that Fas signaling-initiated cancer-related inflammation in breast cancer cells may be a potential target for treatment of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer; Fas; IL-6; Inflammation; MDSC; PGE2; Prostaglandins; Tumor Metastases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627480      PMCID: PMC4036287          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.525014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  50 in total

1.  Triptolide impairs dendritic cell migration by inhibiting CCR7 and COX-2 expression through PI3-K/Akt and NF-kappaB pathways.

Authors:  Qiuyan Liu; Taoyong Chen; Guoyou Chen; Xiaoli Shu; Anna Sun; Pengcheng Ma; Liwei Lu; Xuetao Cao
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  The CD95 receptor: apoptosis revisited.

Authors:  Marcus E Peter; Ralph C Budd; Julie Desbarats; Stephen M Hedrick; Anne-Odile Hueber; M Karen Newell; Laurie B Owen; Richard M Pope; Juerg Tschopp; Harald Wajant; David Wallach; Robert H Wiltrout; Martin Zörnig; David H Lynch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Fas signaling in thyroid carcinomas is diverted from apoptosis to proliferation.

Authors:  Constantine S Mitsiades; Vassiliki Poulaki; Galinos Fanourakis; Elias Sozopoulos; Douglas McMillin; Zhaoqin Wen; Gerassimos Voutsinas; Sophia Tseleni-Balafouta; Nicholas Mitsiades
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Does CD95 have tumor promoting activities?

Authors:  Marcus E Peter; Patrick Legembre; Bryan C Barnhart
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2005-01-27

5.  Fas ligand elicits a caspase-independent proinflammatory response in human keratinocytes: implications for dermatitis.

Authors:  Sherry M Farley; Anjali D Dotson; David E Purdy; Aaron J Sundholm; Pascal Schneider; Bruce E Magun; Mihail S Iordanov
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Fas signal links innate and adaptive immunity by promoting dendritic-cell secretion of CC and CXC chemokines.

Authors:  Zhenhong Guo; Minghui Zhang; Hua Tang; Xuetao Cao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Expansion of myeloid immune suppressor Gr+CD11b+ cells in tumor-bearing host directly promotes tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Li Yang; Laura M DeBusk; Koari Fukuda; Barbara Fingleton; Brenda Green-Jarvis; Yu Shyr; Lynn M Matrisian; David P Carbone; P Charles Lin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Fas ligand induces cell-autonomous NF-kappaB activation and interleukin-8 production by a mechanism distinct from that of tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Authors:  Ryu Imamura; Kenji Konaka; Norihiko Matsumoto; Mizuho Hasegawa; Masayuki Fukui; Naofumi Mukaida; Takeshi Kinoshita; Takashi Suda
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  CD95 ligand induces motility and invasiveness of apoptosis-resistant tumor cells.

Authors:  Bryan C Barnhart; Patrick Legembre; Eric Pietras; Concetta Bubici; Guido Franzoso; Marcus E Peter
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Prostaglandin E2 promotes tumor progression by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Authors:  Pratima Sinha; Virginia K Clements; Amy M Fulton; Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  17 in total

1.  Defective FasL expression is associated with increased resistance to melanoma liver metastases and enhanced natural killer cell activity.

Authors:  Sudha Neelam; Jessamee Mellon; Amber Wilkerson; Jerry Y Niederkorn
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Small GTPase RBJ promotes cancer progression by mobilizing MDSCs via IL-6.

Authors:  Qiuyan Liu; Ha Zhu; Chaoxiong Zhang; Taoyong Chen; Xuetao Cao
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Microbiome, inflammation, and cancer.

Authors:  Ralph Francescone; Vivianty Hou; Sergei I Grivennikov
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  Induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells in vitro by Fas ligand reverse signaling.

Authors:  Thomas Kolben; Udo Jeschke; Toralf Reimer; Nora Karsten; Elisa Schmoeckel; Anna Semmlinger; Sven Mahner; Nadia Harbeck; Theresa M Kolben
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Gambogic acid induces apoptosis and inhibits colorectal tumor growth via mitochondrial pathways.

Authors:  Guang-Ming Huang; Yu Sun; Xin Ge; Xin Wan; Chun-Bo Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Highlights on mechanisms of drugs targeting MDSCs: providing a novel perspective on cancer treatment.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Qian Sun; Yang Wang; Jian Wang; Shui Cao; Xiubao Ren
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Plasma phospholipase A2 activity may serve as a novel diagnostic biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingkun Qu; Xixi Zhao; Jizhao Wang; Chao Liu; Yuchen Sun; Hui Cai; Jianlin Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Tagging staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) with TGFaL3 for breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Forough Yousefi; Seyed Davar Siadat; Alireza Azizi Saraji; Saeed Hesaraki; Mohammad Mehdi Aslani; Seyed Fazlollah Mousavi; Abbas Ali Imani Fooladi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-11

Review 9.  A time for YAP1: Tumorigenesis, immunosuppression and targeted therapy.

Authors:  Masahiro Shibata; Kendall Ham; Mohammad Obaidul Hoque
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with aspirin and 5-fluororacil enable synergistic antitumour activity through the modulation of NF-κB/COX-2 signalling pathway.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Yaping Shen; Liang Zhao
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.