Literature DB >> 24627086

Non-physician performance of lower and upper endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lukejohn W Day1, Derrick Siao2, John M Inadomi3, Ma Somsouk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Demand for endoscopic procedures worldwide has increased while the number of physicians trained to perform endoscopy has remained relatively constant. The objective of this study was to characterize non-physician performance of lower and upper endoscopic procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bibliographical searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included where patients underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or upper endoscopy done by a non-physician (nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant) and outcome measures were reported (detection of polyps, adenomas, cancer, and/or adverse events). Pooled rates were calculated for specific outcomes and rate ratios were determined for selected comparison groups.
RESULTS: Most studies involved nurses performing flexible sigmoidoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Nurses and nurse-practitioners/physician assistants performing flexible sigmoidoscopies showed pooled polyp detection rates of 9.9 % and 23.7 %, adenoma detection rates of 2.9 % and 7.2 %, colorectal cancer detection rates of 1.3 % and 1.2 %, and adverse event rates of 0.3 and 0 per 1000 sigmoidoscopies, respectively. There was no significant difference between polyp and adenoma detection rates in sigmoidoscopy performance studies comparing nurses or nurse-practitioners/physician assistants with physicians. For the 3 studies of non-physician performance of colonoscopy, pooled adenoma detection rate was 26.4 %, cecal intubation rate was 93.5 %, and adverse event rate was 2.2 /1000 colonoscopies. In the few studies examining upper endoscopies, 99.4 % of upper endoscopy procedures performed by nurses were successful with no reported adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Available studies suggest that when non-physicians perform endoscopic procedures, especially lower endoscopies, outcomes and adverse events are in line with those of physicians. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627086      PMCID: PMC4153714          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  51 in total

1.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Wendt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; Demitrius Litwin; Jeffrey Cohen; David Earle; George Ferzli; James Flaherty; Scott Graham; Santiago Horgan; Brian L Katz; Michael Kavic; John Kilkenny; John Meador; Raymond Price; Brian Quebbemann; William Reed; Lelan Sillin; Gary Vitale; E S Xenos; Glenn M Eisen; Jason Dominitz; Douglas Faigel; Jay Goldstein; Anthony Kalloo; Bret Peterson; Hareth Raddawi; Michael Ryan; John Vargo; Harvey Young; Clifford Simmang; Neil Hyman; Theodore Eisenstat; Thomas Anthony; Peter Cataldo; James Church; Jeff Cohen; Frederick Denstman; Edward Glennon; John Kilkenny; John McConnell; Juan Nogueras; Charles Orsay; Daniel Otchy; Ronald Place; Jan Rakinic; Paul Savoca; Joe Tjandra
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The impact of open access flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparison of two services.

Authors:  P J Arumugam; G N Rao; J West; M E Foster; P N Haray
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  2000-12

5.  A randomized controlled trial comparing the accuracy of general diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by nurse or medical endoscopists.

Authors:  C Meaden; M Joshi; S Hollis; A Higham; D Lynch
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Nurse led flexible sigmoidoscopy in primary care--the first thousand patients.

Authors:  K Maruthachalam; E Stoker; G Nicholson; A F Horgan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Nurse endoscopy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  P B Goodfellow; I A Fretwell; J M Simms
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by nurses: scope for the future?

Authors:  S Smale; I Bjarnason; I Forgacs; P Prasad; M Mukhood; M Wong; A Ng; H E Mulcahy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Rural and urban physicians' perceptions regarding the role and practice of the nurse practitioner, physician assistant, and certified nurse midwife.

Authors:  Stephanie E Burgess; Rosanne H Pruitt; Patricia Maybee; Arnold E Metz; Jean Leuner
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  11 in total

1.  Does the Regulatory Environment Affect Nurse Practitioners' Patterns of Practice or Quality of Care in Health Centers?

Authors:  Ellen T Kurtzman; Burt S Barnow; Jean E Johnson; Samuel J Simmens; Donna Lind Infeld; Fitzhugh Mullan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Nonphysician Performance of Endoscopy.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  Non-Physician Endoscopy: How Far Can We Go?

Authors:  Ute Gabriele Pfeifer; Dieter Schilling
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-02-10

4.  The Safety of Multiple Flexible Sigmoidoscopies with Mucosal Biopsies in Healthy Clinical Trial Participants.

Authors:  Wai Kan Chiu; Rhonda M Brand; Danielle Camp; Stacey Edick; Carol Mitchell; Sherri Karas; Amanda Zehmisch; Ken Ho; Randall E Brand; Janet Harrison; Steven Abo; Ross D Cranston; Ian McGowan
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.205

Review 5.  Studying and Incorporating Efficiency into Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Centers.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; David Belson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Assessment of quality indicators among nurse practitioners performing upper endoscopy.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Baumgardner; Justin L Sewell; Lukejohn W Day
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-09-05

7.  Experience of nurse practitioners performing colonoscopy after endoscopic training in more than 1,000 patients.

Authors:  Monica Riegert; Monica Nandwani; Bonny Thul; Angela Chang Chiu; Simon C Mathews; Mouen A Khashab; Anthony Nicholas Kalloo
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-09-22

8.  Attributes of innovations and approaches to scalability - lessons from a national program to extend the scope of practice of health professionals.

Authors:  Malcolm Masso; Cristina Thompson
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-08-26

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer: the role of the primary care physician.

Authors:  John K Triantafillidis; Constantine Vagianos; Aristofanis Gikas; Maria Korontzi; Apostolos Papalois
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Clinical Usefulness of Endoscopy, Barium Fluoroscopy, and Chest Computed Tomography for the Correct Diagnosis of Achalasia.

Authors:  Tetsuya Akaishi; Toru Nakano; Tomomi Machida; Michiaki Abe; Shin Takayama; Ken Koseki; Takashi Kamei; Shin Fukudo; Tadashi Ishii
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 1.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.