Literature DB >> 24626878

Safety and efficacy of selective sac extraction method of inguinal hernia repair in children: results of a prospective study.

Makoto Suzuki1, Masahiro Hatanaka, Junko Fujino, Akihiro Igarashi, Mariko Hasegawa, Kazunori Tahara, Yuki Ishimaru, Hitoshi Ikeda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective study was conducted to confirm the safety and efficacy of the selective sac extraction method (SSEM) of inguinal hernia repairs in children.
METHODS: Primary endpoints of the study were the incidence of any complication related to the SSEM, or hernia recurrence. Secondary endpoints included the success rate of the SSEM, length of incision at the end of operation, and duration of operation. The incidence of contralateral manifestation of hernia was also examined.
RESULTS: Between October 2009 and December 2011, a total of 317 repairs, 145 male repairs and 172 female repairs, were performed by applying the SSEM. There were three operative conversions, and the success rate of the SSEM was 99% in both male and female patients. The length of incision ranged from 4.0 to 12.5 mm (median 6.0 mm) and was ≤7.0 mm in 93% repairs. The incisional length for male repairs ranged from 4.0 to 12.5 mm (median 6.0 mm) and was ≤7.0 mm in 86% repairs, while it ranged from 4.0 to 9.0 mm (median 5.5 mm) in female repairs and was ≤6.5 mm in 96% repairs. The duration of the operation for unilateral repair ranged from 9 to 66 min (median 21 min). Eighty percent of repairs were examined 6-44 months (median 12 months) after the operation. There was one (0.4%) recurrence among 250 repairs and two (1.7%) cases of testicular dislocation among 115 male repairs. Contralateral hernia presented in 19 (9.5%) of 199 patients with unilateral hernia who underwent the follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of the SSEM was reconfirmed, and it was revealed that the complication and recurrence rates were low and acceptable. The SSEM is safe and effective, and should be a standard method for repairing inguinal hernia in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24626878     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-014-3494-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  5 in total

1.  Mini-scar inguinal herniotomy in selected children: comparative analysis of safety, effectiveness, and parents' satisfaction.

Authors:  Ayman Al-Jazaeri; Noura Al-Hassan; Basmah Al-Hassan; Deema Harakati; Reem Al-Hezayen; Abdulrhaman Al-Zahem
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review.

Authors:  Sigmund H Ein; Ike Njere; Arlene Ein
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Is contralateral exploration necessary in infants with unilateral inguinal hernia?

Authors:  R Surana; P Puri
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  A selective sac extraction method: another minimally invasive procedure for inguinal hernia repair in children: a technical innovation with satisfactory surgical and cosmetic results.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ikeda; Masahiro Hatanaka; Makoto Suzuki; Junko Fujino; Kazunori Tahara; Yuki Ishimaru
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Analysis of 3,776 pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele cases in a tertiary center.

Authors:  Derya Erdoğan; Ibrahim Karaman; Mustafa Kemal Aslan; Ayşe Karaman; Yusuf Hakan Cavuşoğlu
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.545

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.