OBJECTIVE: The total enteroscopy rate of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) using air insufflation is not satisfactory, and whether carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation increases the total enteroscopy rate of SBE is unknown. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine whether CO2 insufflation facilitates the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate of SBE. DESIGN: A total of 214 eligible patients referred for SBE were randomised to receive either air or CO2 insufflation, and included in the intention-to-test (ITT) analysis. In addition, 199 patients in whom enteroscopy was completed were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Both the patients and endoscopists were blinded, and the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate were defined as the primary outcomes. RESULTS: The CO2 group showed a superiority of intubation in the ITT analysis (oral route: 323.8±64.2 vs 238.3±68.6 cm; anal route: 261.6±74.2 vs 174.7±62.1 cm, both p<0.001), and the total enteroscopy rate (34.9% vs 17.6%, p=0.006). Similar results were obtained in a PP analysis for both outcomes. In addition, in the PP analysis, the addition of circumference after the procedure was less in the CO2 group (0.8±0.6 vs 3.3±1.8 cm, p=0.005) for the oral route. No serious complications were reported. The overall percentage of procedures with significant pathological findings was 52.8%; the rates were 58.5% and 47.2% (p=0.100, ITT analysis) in the CO2 and air groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:CO2 insufflation improves the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate in SBE with a good safety profile and acceptability compared with that of air, and thus is recommended for clinical utilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01758900. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The total enteroscopy rate of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) using air insufflation is not satisfactory, and whether carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation increases the total enteroscopy rate of SBE is unknown. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine whether CO2 insufflation facilitates the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate of SBE. DESIGN: A total of 214 eligible patients referred for SBE were randomised to receive either air or CO2 insufflation, and included in the intention-to-test (ITT) analysis. In addition, 199 patients in whom enteroscopy was completed were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Both the patients and endoscopists were blinded, and the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate were defined as the primary outcomes. RESULTS: The CO2 group showed a superiority of intubation in the ITT analysis (oral route: 323.8±64.2 vs 238.3±68.6 cm; anal route: 261.6±74.2 vs 174.7±62.1 cm, both p<0.001), and the total enteroscopy rate (34.9% vs 17.6%, p=0.006). Similar results were obtained in a PP analysis for both outcomes. In addition, in the PP analysis, the addition of circumference after the procedure was less in the CO2 group (0.8±0.6 vs 3.3±1.8 cm, p=0.005) for the oral route. No serious complications were reported. The overall percentage of procedures with significant pathological findings was 52.8%; the rates were 58.5% and 47.2% (p=0.100, ITT analysis) in the CO2 and air groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:CO2 insufflation improves the intubation depth and total enteroscopy rate in SBE with a good safety profile and acceptability compared with that of air, and thus is recommended for clinical utilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01758900. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gastrointesinal Endoscopy; Small Bowel Enteroscopy
Authors: Ashok Shiani; Seth Lipka; Andrew Lai; Andrea C Rodriguez; Christian M Andrade; Ambuj Kumar; Patrick Brady Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2017-01
Authors: Giovanni Di Nardo; Gianluca Esposito; Chiara Ziparo; Federica Micheli; Luigi Masoni; Maria Pia Villa; Pasquale Parisi; Maria Beatrice Manca; Flavia Baccini; Vito Domenico Corleto Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Robert A Moran; Sindhu Barola; Joanna K Law; Stuart K Amateau; Daniil Rolshud; Erin Corless; Vandhana Kiswani; Vikesh K Singh; Anthony N Kalloo; Mouen A Khashab; Anne Marie Lennon; Patrick I Okolo; Vivek Kumbhari Journal: Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol Date: 2018-01-24
Authors: Julio Cesar Martins Aquino; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Flávio Hiroshi Ananias Morita; Rodrigo Silva de Paula Rocha; Maurício Kazuyoshi Minata; Martin Coronel; Gustavo Luís da Silva Rodela; Robson Kiyoshi Ishida; Rogério Kuga; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2018-05-25