Literature DB >> 24626398

Enhanced response of microbial fuel cell using sulfonated poly ether ether ketone membrane as a biochemical oxygen demand sensor.

Sivasankaran Ayyaru1, Sangeetha Dharmalingam2.   

Abstract

The present study is focused on the development of single chamber microbial fuel cell (SCMFC) using sulfonated poly ether ether ketone (SPEEK) membrane to determine the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) matter present in artificial wastewater (AW). The biosensor produces a good linear relationship with the BOD concentration up to 650 ppm when using artificial wastewater. This sensing range was 62.5% higher than that of Nafion(®). The most serious problem in using MFC as a BOD sensor is the oxygen diffusion into the anode compartment, which consumes electrons in the anode compartment, thereby reducing the coulomb yield and reducing the electrical signal from the MFC. SPEEK exhibited one order lesser oxygen permeability than Nafion(®), resulting in low internal resistance and substrate loss, thus improving the sensing range of BOD. The system was further improved by making a double membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with an increased electrode surface area which provide high surface area for electrically active bacteria.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosensor; Double membrane electrode assembly; Microbial fuel cells; Nafion(®); Proton exchange membranes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24626398     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  9 in total

1.  Applicability of a submersible microbial fuel cell for Cr(VI) detection in water.

Authors:  Hyeonyong Chung; Won Jung Ju; Eun Hea Jho; Kyoungphile Nam
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Contribution of configurations, electrode and membrane materials, electron transfer mechanisms, and cost of components on the current and future development of microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Fátima Borja-Maldonado; Miguel Ángel López Zavala
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 3.  Microbial fuel cell system: a promising technology for pollutant removal and environmental remediation.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Shipu Jiao; Mengxing Ma; Sen Peng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Effects of Operating Parameters on Measurements of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Using a Mediatorless Microbial Fuel Cell Biosensor.

Authors:  Min-Chi Hsieh; Chiu-Yu Cheng; Man-Hai Liu; Ying-Chien Chung
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Microbial Fuels Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Detection: A Review.

Authors:  Tuoyu Zhou; Huawen Han; Pu Liu; Jian Xiong; Fake Tian; Xiangkai Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensors.

Authors:  Yang Cui; Bin Lai; Xinhua Tang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-23

7.  Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensor for Simultaneous Test of Sodium Acetate and Glucose in a Mixed Solution.

Authors:  Song Qiu; Luyang Wang; Yimei Zhang; Yingjie Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Enhancing Signal Output and Avoiding BOD/Toxicity Combined Shock Interference by Operating a Microbial Fuel Cell Sensor with an Optimized Background Concentration of Organic Matter.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Peng Liang; Panpan Liu; Yanhong Bian; Bo Miao; Xueliang Sun; Helan Zhang; Xia Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Sensors Based on Bio and Biomimetic Receptors in Medical Diagnostic, Environment, and Food Analysis.

Authors:  Alisa N Kozitsina; Tatiana S Svalova; Natalia N Malysheva; Andrei V Okhokhonin; Marina B Vidrevich; Khiena Z Brainina
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.