Literature DB >> 24626067

Accuracy of national surgery quality improvement program models in predicting postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing colectomy.

Jeffrey A Neale1, Craig Reickert2, Andrew Swartz3, Subhash Reddy4, Maher A Abbas5, Ilan Rubinfeld6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is the standard for assessment of acuity-adjusted outcomes in surgery. The validity of NSQIP has not been well established in colorectal surgery. Technical and process variables, which NSQIP may not consider, affect morbidity rate.
OBJECTIVE: A retrospective observational study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of NSQIP models in predicting morbidity for patients undergoing laparoscopic or open colectomy.
METHODS: NSQIP participant use files for 2005 to 2008 were obtained. Data were selected using Current Procedural Terminology coding for open or laparoscopic colectomy. NSQIP-generated predicted morbidities were used to create area under the receiver operator curves (AUROCs).
RESULTS: AUROCs demonstrated an accurate predictive model if the value was above 0.8 and indicated a marginal predictor mode if below 0.7. The AUROC for the general NSQIP model was 0.817 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.815-0.819, p < 0.001). AUROC for the combined laparoscopic and open colectomy group was 0.703 (CI = 0.698-0.709, p value < 0.001). AUROCs for the individual laparoscopic and open colectomy groups were 0.627 (CI = 0.615-0.640, p < 0.001) and 0.701 (CI = 0.695-0.707, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although NSQIP-generated morbidities used to create AUROCs are accurate for patients in an overall surgical model, predictive models for morbidity are marginal for laparoscopic and open abdominal colectomies. NSQIP risk models tend to emphasize comorbidities rather than intraoperative details or technical aspects of colonic resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24626067      PMCID: PMC3951025          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/12-133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: does the national surgical quality improvement program tell the whole story?

Authors:  Matthew G Mutch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Galal Hussein El-Gazzaz; Jon D Vogel; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets.

Authors:  Prabasaj Paul; Michael L Pennell; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The challenge of benchmarking: surgical volume and operative mortality in Veterans Administration Medical Centers.

Authors:  E W Bates; S E Berki; R K Homan; S M Lindenauer
Journal:  Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

5.  A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics.

Authors:  Michael J Englesbe; Linda Brooks; James Kubus; Martin Luchtefeld; James Lynch; Anthony Senagore; John C Eggenberger; Vic Velanovich; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Fergal J Fleming; Todd D Francone; Michael J Kim; Douglas Gunzler; Susan Messing; John R T Monson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  W E Longo; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; C A Oprian; A M Vernava; T P Wade; M A Phelan; W G Henderson; J Daley; S F Khuri
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery.

Authors:  Peter L Schilling; Justin B Dimick; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Surgical site infections in a "high outlier" institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame?

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wick; Jon D Vogel; James M Church; Feza Remzi; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Janet E Steeger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  2 in total

1.  The association of preoperative blood markers with postoperative readmissions following arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amir Khoshbin; Graeme Hoit; Lauren Leone Nowak; Anser Daud; Martine Steiner; Peter Juni; Bheeshma Ravi; Amit Atrey
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-06

2.  Risk assessment of morbidities after right hemicolectomy based on the National Clinical Database in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Yoshida; Hiroaki Miyata; Hiroyuki Konno; Hiraku Kumamaru; Akira Tangoku; Yoshihito Furukita; Norimichi Hirahara; Go Wakabayashi; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-04-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.