Literature DB >> 24625606

Features suggestive of gallbladder malignancy: analysis of T1, T2, and T3 tumors on cross-sectional imaging.

Charles H Mitchell1, Pamela T Johnson, Elliot K Fishman, Ralph H Hruban, Siva P Raman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Gallbladder cancer carries an extremely high mortality rate, with a 5-year survival rate as low as 12%. Survival is dependent on the diagnosis of these tumors in their earliest stages. This study sought to describe the clinical and imaging features of stages T1, T2, and T3 gallbladder tumors and to illustrate features that may allow radiologists to make an early diagnosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval from the institutional review board, a search of the pathology department database yielded 18 patients with surgically proven T1, T2, and T3 gallbladder cancers with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. The imaging was reviewed for lesional morphology (focal polyploid mass, focal wall thickening, circumferential wall thickening), enhancement characteristics, liver invasion, locoregional lymphadenopathy, and distant metastatic disease. The electronic medical record was also searched for demographic information and clinical presentation.
RESULTS: There were 10 women and 8 men with a mean age of 69 years. Virtually all patients were symptomatic, with most patients demonstrating symptoms suggestive of underlying malignancy (including jaundice, weight loss, and chronic abdominal pain). Tumors on CT and MRI included 6 polyploid masses, 9 tumors with focal wall thickening, and 3 with circumferential wall thickening. The mean attenuation of those tumors imaged with CT was 59.4 Hounsfield units (HUs) on the arterial phase and 86.5 HUs on the venous phase, with a mean increase in Hounsfield attenuation between the arterial and venous phases of 28.2 HUs. Twelve of the 18 patients were correctly diagnosed prospectively on CT.
CONCLUSIONS: The imaging findings of gallbladder cancer can be subtle, regardless of whether the tumor presents as a discrete mass, focal wall thickening, or circumferential diffuse wall thickening, and radiologists should be aware of the wide range of different possible appearances. Moreover, the vast majority of these patients had clinical symptoms suggestive of an underlying malignancy, and this should precipitate a careful evaluation of the gallbladder in all such cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24625606      PMCID: PMC4318233          DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182aafb6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  16 in total

1.  Gallbladder cancer: comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention.

Authors:  Y Fong; W Jarnagin; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  MRI of gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Kian Soon Lim
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Carcinoma and the calcified gall bladder.

Authors:  H C Polk
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: the use of preoperative CT findings to differentiate it from gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Satoru Ozawa; Masaki Ueno; Shinya Hayami; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2009-03-12

5.  Small polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: differential diagnosis and surgical indications by helical computed tomography.

Authors:  H Furukawa; T Kosuge; K Shimada; J Yamamoto; Y Kanai; K Mukai; R Iwata; K Ushio
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-07

6.  Accuracy of preoperative T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma using MDCT.

Authors:  Soo Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Jae Young Lee; Jin Young Choi; Se Hyung Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MDCT in the staging of gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Sudha Suri; Rajesh Gupta; S K Natarajan; Niranjan Khandelwal; J D Wig; Kusum Joshi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Gallbladder carcinoma manifesting as acute cholecystitis: clinical and computed tomographic features.

Authors:  Jiun-Lung Liang; Min-Chi Chen; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Shu-Hang Ng; Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen; Po-Ping Liu; Chia-Te Kung; Sheung-Fat Ko
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Gallbladder carcinoma and chronic cholecystitis: differentiation with two-phase spiral CT.

Authors:  E J Yun; S G Cho; S Park; S W Park; W H Kim; H J Kim; C H Suh
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Carcinoma of the gall-bladder: an experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  D S Wilkinson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1995-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Radio-pathological Correlation of 18F-FDG PET in Characterizing Gallbladder Wall Thickening.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; K S Vishnu; Thakur D Yadav; Yashwant R Sakaray; Santosh Irrinki; B R Mittal; N Kalra; K Vaiphei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

2.  [Radiologic diagnosis of the gallbladder and bile ducts - part 2 : Acute and chronic cholecystitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), benign and malignant masses of the biliary system].

Authors:  H Helmberger; B Kammer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Histopathological Examination of Gallbladder Specimens in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar Shukla; Prabhat Pant; Govind Singh; K S Shahi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

4.  The giant resectable carcinoma of gall bladder-a case report.

Authors:  Lovenish Bains; Haraesh Maranna; Pawan Lal; Ronal Kori; Daljit Kaur; Varuna Mallya; Veerpal Singh
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.