| Literature DB >> 24624932 |
Xin Guan, Tao Sun, Yan Hou, Liang Zhao, Yi-Ze Luan, Li-Hua Fan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and job performance (JP), it remains unclear whether this relationship is appropriate for faculty members at Chinese universities. The objectives of this study were to (a) examine the correlation between POS andJP; (b) identify the predictors of POS, including demographic and organizational characteristics among faculty members at a Chinese university; (c) investigate the influence of mediating factors between POS and JP; and (d) compare the findings of this study with related studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24624932 PMCID: PMC4008306 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-50
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Figure 1Hypothetical model of the relationships between antecedents and POS, the direct association between POS and JP, and the mediating effect of job satisfaction, positive affectivity, and affective commitment in the association between POS and JP among faculty members from a Chinese university.
Fit Results of Tests of Unidimensionality for Procedural Justice (PJ), Distributive Justice (DJ), Perceived Organizational Support (POS), Job Satisfaction (JS), Positive Affectivity (PA), Affective Commitment (AC), and Performance
| Procedural Justice (PJ) | 5 | 132.83 | 5 | .92 | .97 | .96 | .03 |
| Distributive Justice (DJ) | 5 | 354.64 | 5 | .80 | .88 | .88 | .07 |
| POS | 8 | 333.22 | 20 | .87 | .96 | .96 | .04 |
| Job Satisfaction (JS) | 5 | 54.45 | 5 | .96 | .94 | .94 | .06 |
| Positive Affectivity (PA) | 10 | 661.70 | 35 | .81 | .92 | .92 | .08 |
| Affective Commitment (AC) | 6 | 87.55 | 9 | .95 | .98 | .98 | .03 |
| Performance | 5 | 76.69 | 5 | .95 | .98 | .98 | .02 |
| The whole scales | 44 | 2038.33 | 805 | .86 | .95 | .90 | .10 |
Note. All chi-squared values were significant, p < .001. GFI = goodness of fit index; CFI = comparative fit index; NFI = normed fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual.
Descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations
| 1 Procedural Justice (PJ) | 4.92 | 1.57 | (.95) | | | | | | |
| 2 Distributive Justice (DJ) | 4.56 | 1.52 | .73 | (.92) | | | | | |
| 3 POS | 4.08 | 1.44 | .66 | .67 | (.94) | | | | |
| 4 Job Satisfaction (JS) | 4.63 | 1.53 | .56 | .66 | .56 | (.56) | | | |
| 5 Positive Affectivity (PA) | 4.94 | 1.11 | .37 | .34 | .29 | .37 | (.91) | | |
| 6 Affective Commitment (AC) | 4.76 | 1.33 | .57 | .60 | .56 | .70 | .42 | (.91) | |
| 7 Performance | 5.70 | 1.30 | .39 | .33 | .28 | .41 | .50 | .47 | (.97) |
Note. correlation coefficients were significant, p<.001; Cronbach’s alpha coefficients are in parentheses.
Path coefficients of mediators and fit statistics
| POS—JS | A | 0.60 | 0.04 | 16.33*** | |
| JS—JP | B | 0.09 | 0.04 | 2.16* | |
| POS—PA | A | 0.22 | 0.03 | 7.22*** | |
| PA—JP | B | 0.42 | 0.04 | 9.44*** | |
| POS—AC | A | 0.52 | 0.03 | 16.28*** | |
| AC—JP | B | 0.25 | 0.05 | 5.14*** | |
| POS—JP | C | 0.25 | 0.04 | 6.99*** | |
| POS—M—JP | C’ | −0.03 | 0.04 | -.74 | |
| Model | 0.33 |
Note. POS=Perceived Organizational Support; JP=Job Performance; JS=Job Satisfaction; PA=Positive Affectivity; AC=Affective Commitment; A, path coefficient for independent variable on mediators; B, path coefficient for mediators on dependent variables; C, path coefficient for independent variable on dependent variable; C’, path coefficient for independent variable on dependent variable when controlling mediators. *p<.05 ***p<.001.
Mediation of the effect of perceived organizational support on performance through job satisfaction, positive affectivity, and affective commitment
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job satisfaction | .05 | .02 | 2.14* | .0016 | .1122 |
| Positive affectivity | .09 | .02 | 5.80*** | .0601 | .1339 |
| Affective commitment | .13 | .03 | 4.92*** | .0674 | .2057 |
| Total | .28 | .03 | 9.28*** | .2130 | .3566 |
Note. bootstrap sample = 1000; BCa = bias corrected and accelerated *p<.05; ***p<.001.
Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis regarding the contribution of demographic and organizational characteristics, procedural justice, and distributive justice to the explanation of variance of POS
| | The first step | |||
| Demographic characteristics | | | | |
| Sex | .01 | .17 | | |
| Age | -.11 | −1.83 | | |
| Educational level | -.05 | −1.00 | | |
| Tenure | -.09 | −1.51 | | |
| Job title | .00 | .03 | | |
| Income level | .00 | -.03 | | |
| Total | | 1.87** | .04 | |
| Organizational characteristics | | | | |
| School level | −0.10 | .25 | | |
| Subject level | −0.12 | −1.81 | | |
| Total | | 1.30 | .01 | |
| Total of covariates | | 1.72** | .04 | .04 |
| | The second step | |||
| Organizational justice | | | | |
| Procedural justice | .41 | 9.57*** | | |
| Distributive justice | .35 | 8.23*** | | |
| Total | | 17.29*** | .49 | .49 |
| Total of all predictors | 8.04*** | .53 |
Note. a = standardized regression coefficient. **p<.01 ***p<.001.