| Literature DB >> 24624341 |
Weiling Xu1, Allison J Janocha1, Rachel A Leahy1, Ryan Klatte1, Dave Dudzinski1, Lori A Mavrakis1, Suzy A A Comhair1, Mark E Lauer1, Calvin U Cotton2, Serpil C Erzurum3.
Abstract
Air-liquid interface cell culture is an organotypic model for study of differentiated functional airway epithelium in vitro. Dysregulation of cellular energy metabolism and mitochondrial function have been suggested to contribute to airway diseases. However, there is currently no established method to determine oxygen consumption and glycolysis in airway epithelium in air-liquid interface. In order to study metabolism in differentiated airway epithelial cells, we engineered an insert for the Seahorse XF24 Analyzer that enabled the measure of respiration by oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and glycolysis by extracellular acidification rate (ECAR). Oxidative metabolism and glycolysis in airway epithelial cells cultured on the inserts were successfully measured. The inserts did not affect the measures of OCR or ECAR. Cells under media with apical and basolateral feeding had less oxidative metabolism as compared to cells on the inserts at air-interface with basolateral feeding. The design of inserts that can be used in the measure of bioenergetics in small numbers of cells in an organotypic state may be useful for evaluation of new drugs and metabolic mechanisms that underlie airway diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Airway epithelial cells; Air–liquid interface culture; ECAR, extracellular acidification rate; Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR); MTEC, mouse tracheal epithelial cell; Metabolism; OCR, oxygen consumption rate; Oxygen consumption rate (OCR); TCA, tricarboxylic acid; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24624341 PMCID: PMC3949089 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 11.799
Fig. 1Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells in vivo and under submerged culture in vitro. (A–C) Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells in vivo. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining showed ciliary pseudostratified epithelium (A). Electronic microscopy images (B and C) demonstrated ciliated cells (B) and mitochondria (C). Mitochondria distributed predominantly toward the apical domain (arrowheads). Scale bars: 20 μm (A) or 1 μm (B and C). (D–F) Morphological and immunohistochemistry analysis of human airway epithelial cells under submerged culture in vitro. Submerged culture human airway epithelial cells under phase contrast microscopy (A), (H&E) staining (B) and Immunohistochemistry analysis (C). Brown cytoplasm staining indicated Keratin positive. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Fig. 2Differentiation occurs following exposure to air. Histological analyses of normal differentiation of murine airway epithelial cells in air–liquid interface cultures. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Fig. 3Human airway epithelial air–liquid interface cultures in vitro. (A–B) Toluidine staining of human airway epithelial cells at air–liquid interface cultures. Toluidine staining section of human airway epithelial cells at air–liquid interface culture demonstrated histologic appearance of ciliated cells (arrowheads). Scale bars: 10 μm. (C–D) Three-dimensional confocal images of human airway epithelial cells at air–liquid interface. Cilia were highlighted by Tubulin β4 staining (red), and DAPI-stained nuclei were blue. The apical surface of human airway epithelial cells at air–liquid interface had cilia (C; white arrowheads point to cilia). A cross-sectional confocal (D) identified nuclei (blue) at basal regions of cells, and cilia apically [white arrowhead]. Scale bars: 20 μm. (E–H) Ultrastructural analyses of human airway epithelial cells at air–liquid interface cultures. Cells were ciliated. High power (F and H) revealed mitochondrion (black arrowhead in F) and typical mucus product in cells (white arrowhead in F), and cilium (arrow in H). Scale bars: 1 μm. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Bioelectric properties of primary human bronchial epithelial cells in air–liquid interface cultures verified airway epithelial differentiation function.
| Basal | Amiloride | Δ Amiloride Na+Absorption | Forskolin and IBMX | Δ Forskolin and IBMX Cl- Secretion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-circuit current (µAmp/cm2) | 23.7±5.3 | 1.6±0.4 | 22.1±4.9 | 5.1±1.1 | 3.5±0.8 |
| Transepithelial resistance (kΩ-cm2) | 1.39±0.05 | 2.28±0.12 | 0.89±0.16 | 1.69±0.08 | 0.63±0.04 |
Fig. 4BET-1A cellular bioenergetics in insert for Seahorse Islet Plate. (A–B) Top and bottom of inserts. Cells were seeded into the top well of the insert formed by the acrylic ring shown in A. Scale bars: 1 mm. (C–D) Inserts fitted into the wells of the Seahorse islet plate. D is a close-up view of C, showing three inserts and one empty well. (E) Similar MitoStress profile in BET-1A cells in engineered inserts (n=6) or without (n=4) as measured by the Seahorse XF 24 Analyzer. Inhibitors were used to assess mitochondrial function. ATPase inhibitor oligomycin (oligomycin), mitochondrial uncoupler (FCCP) and a cocktail of rotenone (ETC complex I inhibitor) and antimycin A (ETC complex III inhibitor) were injected sequentially at indicated times after basal rates were measured. OCR was normalized to the final basal measurement. Basal OCR was 112±10 in inserts and 215±12 in wells (control). There was no significant difference between inserts and controls with oligomycin or with FCCP (both P>0.05).
Fig. 5Metabolism of mouse airway epithelial cells in air–liquid interface in insert for Seahorse Islet Plate. (A–B) Confocal images of murine air–liquid interface. Cilia were highlighted by Tubulin β4 staining (green, white arrowheads), and DAPI-stained nuclei blue. Scale bars: 20 μm. (C–E) Mouse airway epithelial cells were cultured in air–liquid interface or submerged (n≥3). Basal OCR and basal ECAR were plotted against each other (C). OCR (D) and ECAR (E) were measured in murine airway epithelial cells grown submerged or differentiated at air–liquid interface for 8 days using our inserts. Data showed the mean±SE. The air–liquid interface cultures had greater basal OCR and basal ECAR (both P<0.05), suggesting greater glucose oxidation and glucose utilization in cells grown at air–liquid interface. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)