| Literature DB >> 24624001 |
Kei Kohno1, Hiroto Narimatsu2, Katsumi Otani2, Ri Sho2, Yosuke Shiono1, Ikuko Suzuki1, Yuichi Kato1, Akira Fukao2, Takeo Kato1.
Abstract
"Spatial statistics" is an academic field that deals with the statistical analysis of spatial data, and has been applied to econometrics and various other policy fields. These methods are easily applied by hematologists and oncologists using better and much less expensive software. To encourage physicians to use these methods, this review introduces the methods and demonstrates the analyses using R and FleXScan, which can be freely downloaded from the website, with sample data. It is demonstrated that spatial analysis can be used by physicians to analyze hematological diseases. In addition, applying the technique presented to the investigation of patient prognoses may enable generation of data that are also useful for solving health policy-related problems, such as the optimal distribution of medical resources.Entities:
Keywords: Tango’s index; leukemia; malignant lymphoma; spatial regression model
Year: 2014 PMID: 24624001 PMCID: PMC3949695 DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S57944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Blood Med ISSN: 1179-2736
Figure 1Preparing the dataset.
Example data set for analysis using R in the style of “csv file” format.
| Name_Town | Easting | Northing | Population | Cases | Case_ageadj | Number_Dr | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yamagata | −193573.0988 | −43217.3042 | 2,299,358 | 545 | 28.389 | 15 | 38.25555556 | 140.3397222 |
| Yonezawa | −230424.3634 | −62988.36059 | 841,646 | 172 | 23.768 | 0 | 37.92222222 | 140.1169444 |
| Tsuruoka | −140832.37 | −87520.82925 | 1,292,185 | 345 | 28.114 | 2 | 38.72722222 | 139.8266667 |
| Sakata | −120049.4896 | −86461.856 | 1,065,685 | 283 | 28.612 | 2 | 38.91444444 | 139.8363889 |
| Shinjo | −137061.3 | −46052.9 | 369,675 | 82 | 25.932 | 0 | 38.76472222 | 140.3019444 |
| Sagae | −179654.0025 | −48707.31171 | 390,794 | 98 | 27.335 | 0 | 38.38111111 | 140.2761111 |
| Kaminoyama | −205271.791 | −49550.03961 | 324,766 | 95 | 29.032 | 0 | 38.14972222 | 140.2677778 |
| Murayama | −168265.0176 | −39519.26074 | 256,620 | 75 | 27.645 | 0 | 38.48361111 | 140.3805556 |
| Nagai | −209778.9763 | −69523.72955 | 279,688 | 59 | 21.521 | 0 | 38.10777778 | 140.0405556 |
| Tendo | −181703.4383 | −39801.64365 | 572,313 | 132 | 27.471 | 0 | 38.36222222 | 140.3783333 |
| Higashine | −174039.9806 | −38610.92744 | 410,802 | 107 | 30.146 | 0 | 38.43138889 | 140.3911111 |
| Obanazawa | −155258.5607 | −37248.51264 | 188,536 | 72 | 35.768 | 0 | 38.60083333 | 140.4058333 |
| Nanyo | −215666.9414 | −60110.67313 | 317,943 | 70 | 22.726 | 0 | 38.05527778 | 140.1483333 |
| Yamanobe | −189765.6438 | −49962.91601 | 138,887 | 32 | 23.648 | 0 | 38.28916667 | 140.2625 |
| Nakayaka | −184893.6124 | −48110.01265 | 112,686 | 25 | 24.301 | 0 | 38.33333333 | 140.2830556 |
| Kahoku | −174560.9516 | −45330.48574 | 188,542 | 33 | 17.634 | 0 | 38.42638889 | 140.3144444 |
| Nishikawa | −174421.1478 | −59933.33229 | 63,162 | 14 | 20.841 | 0 | 38.42666667 | 140.1477778 |
| Asahimachi | −188584.8381 | −60139.77135 | 78,745 | 26 | 28.92 | 0 | 38.29916667 | 140.1458333 |
| Oe | −179566.3401 | −54732.39917 | 90,530 | 26 | 26.658 | 0 | 38.38083333 | 140.2066667 |
| Oishida | −155995.0525 | −40128.01409 | 80,408 | 19 | 22.865 | 0 | 38.59388889 | 140.3727778 |
| Kanayama | −123826.3723 | −42855.32396 | 63,336 | 11 | 16.938 | 0 | 38.88333333 | 140.3394444 |
| Mogami | −137786.8174 | −27288.06881 | 98,093 | 27 | 28.044 | 0 | 38.75861111 | 140.5194444 |
| Funagata | −145140.4643 | −44670.79428 | 60,105 | 15 | 23.314 | 0 | 38.69166667 | 140.32 |
| Mamurogawa | −126631.9239 | −50427.91024 | 90,914 | 25 | 25.42 | 0 | 38.85777778 | 140.2525 |
| Okuramura | −143684.0694 | −52437.41507 | 38,206 | 9 | 22.35 | 0 | 38.70416667 | 140.2305556 |
| Ayukawa | −133430.2608 | −53099.1817 | 49,539 | 6 | 11.357 | 0 | 38.79611111 | 140.2216667 |
| Tozawamura | −139928.2397 | −59947.05624 | 54,411 | 11 | 19.27 | 0 | 38.73777778 | 140.1436111 |
| Takahata | −221510.741 | −56572.59365 | 236,178 | 67 | 30.49 | 0 | 38.00277778 | 140.1891667 |
| Kawanishi | −221226.2899 | −69153.53206 | 169,893 | 42 | 23.761 | 4 | 38.00444444 | 140.0458333 |
| Ogunicho | −214607.455 | −95645.93711 | 88,141 | 22 | 23.433 | 0 | 38.06138889 | 139.7433333 |
| Shirataka | −201432.5264 | −64381.17725 | 148,156 | 36 | 23.604 | 0 | 38.18305556 | 140.0986111 |
| Iide | −216596.8133 | −74224.76254 | 78,737 | 26 | 31.877 | 0 | 38.04583333 | 139.9875 |
| Mikawa | −133372.6294 | −85462.65233 | 70,855 | 23 | 32.516 | 0 | 38.79444444 | 139.8497222 |
| Shonai | −127246.8596 | −80613.04245 | 222,489 | 55 | 25.788 | 0 | 38.84972222 | 139.9047222 |
| Yuza | −108994.8673 | −80174.36181 | 154,019 | 59 | 36.389 | 0 | 39.01472222 | 139.9075 |
Notes: Data set includes the names of the municipalities in Yamagata: prefecture as names and regions including the x, y coordinates of the municipalities on a plane rectangular coordinate system, the longitudes and latitudes of the municipalities, the population, and the incidences of diseases.
Abbreviations: ageadj, age-adjusted; Dr, doctor.
Figure 2Instructions for Pearson’s chi-squared test and Tango’s test using R with the “spdep” and “Dcluster” packages.
Figure 3Disease cluster analysis by Tango’s index using crude and age-adjusted disease incidences by region of Yamagata Prefecture.
Notes: Crude (A) and age-adjusted disease incidences using the 1985 model population of Japan (B) and the 2008 population of Yamagata Prefecture (C), by region of Yamagata Prefecture. Disease clusters using crude incidences are shown for Tsuruoka, Sakata, Obanazawa, Mogami, Funagata, Mamuragawa, Okura, Mikawa, Shonai, and Uza (P=0.048). Disease clusters using age-adjusted disease incidences and the 1985 model population of Japan are shown for Yamagata, Kaminoyama, and Takahata (P=0.001). Disease clusters using the age-adjusted disease incidences and the 2008 population of Yamagata Prefecture are shown for Kaminoyama (P=0.001). Points and lines indicate municipalities and their contiguous areas, respectively. Disease clusters are shown by black dots with red lines.
Figure 4Instructions for spatial auto-regression analysis using R with the package “spdep”.