BACKGROUND: The relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been controversial. Recent studies have revealed adverse impact of antidiabetic drugs on BMD in type 2 diabetic patients. However, the influence of various antihyperglycaemic agents on BMD has not been well studied. METHOD: A total of 200 patients with T2DM were screened initially for the study. Finally 67 patients (M:34, F:33) who satisfied the requirement of having been on one year of prescribed therapy were included for analysis. RESULTS: Bone mineral density was lower in diabetic patients as compared to controls (hip 0.962 ± 0.167 g/cm(2) vs 1.013 ± 0.184 g/cm(2), P = 0.05; spine 0.929 ± 0.214 g/cm(2) vs 1.113 ± 0.186 g/cm(2), P < 0.00001). In males BMD was significantly lower at spine (P < 0.00001) and in females BMD was significantly lower in both at the spine (P < 0.00001) and hip (P < 0.032). On multivariate analysis significant positive correlation was found between spine BMD and body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.372, P = 0.002), total cholesterol (r = 0.272, P = 0.026), low-density lipoprotein (r = 0.242, P = 0.047), and triglycerides (r = 0.282, P = 0.021). There was no correlation between BMD and glycosylated haemoglobin (r = 0.158, P = 0.265). A significant decrease in BMD at spine and hip was seen with the use of glitazones and metformin while increase was noted with sulphonylurea and its combination. CONCLUSION: Men and women with T2DM have lower BMD. Bone mineral density did not have correlation to glycaemic control. Glitazones, metformin, and insulin are associated with decrease in BMD at spine, and hip, while sulphonylureas are associated with increase in BMD.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been controversial. Recent studies have revealed adverse impact of antidiabetic drugs on BMD in type 2 diabeticpatients. However, the influence of various antihyperglycaemic agents on BMD has not been well studied. METHOD: A total of 200 patients with T2DM were screened initially for the study. Finally 67 patients (M:34, F:33) who satisfied the requirement of having been on one year of prescribed therapy were included for analysis. RESULTS: Bone mineral density was lower in diabeticpatients as compared to controls (hip 0.962 ± 0.167 g/cm(2) vs 1.013 ± 0.184 g/cm(2), P = 0.05; spine 0.929 ± 0.214 g/cm(2) vs 1.113 ± 0.186 g/cm(2), P < 0.00001). In males BMD was significantly lower at spine (P < 0.00001) and in females BMD was significantly lower in both at the spine (P < 0.00001) and hip (P < 0.032). On multivariate analysis significant positive correlation was found between spine BMD and body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.372, P = 0.002), total cholesterol (r = 0.272, P = 0.026), low-density lipoprotein (r = 0.242, P = 0.047), and triglycerides (r = 0.282, P = 0.021). There was no correlation between BMD and glycosylated haemoglobin (r = 0.158, P = 0.265). A significant decrease in BMD at spine and hip was seen with the use of glitazones and metformin while increase was noted with sulphonylurea and its combination. CONCLUSION:Men and women with T2DM have lower BMD. Bone mineral density did not have correlation to glycaemic control. Glitazones, metformin, and insulin are associated with decrease in BMD at spine, and hip, while sulphonylureas are associated with increase in BMD.
Entities:
Keywords:
antihyperglycaemic drugs; bone mineral density; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors: M Sosa; M Dominguez; M C Navarro; M C Segarra; D Hernández; P de Pablos; P Betancor Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 1996 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: José L Hernández; José M Olmos; Carmen Ramos; Josefina Martínez; Julia de Juan; Carmen Valero; Daniel Nan; Jesus González-Macías Journal: Endocr J Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 2.349
Authors: Adina Elena Stanciu; Marcel Marian Stanciu; Anca Zamfirescu; Dan Cristian Gheorghe Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 6.575