OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The increased number of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches (EETSA) has been associated with sinonasal complications such as olfactory dysfunction. Current studies have compared preoperative and postoperative olfactory function according to surgical type and age. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical type and into four groups according to age. The two surgical groups were defined based on the bilateral nasoseptal flap technique (group A: right conventional nasoseptal flap and left modified nasoseptal rescure flap; group B: bilateral modified nasoseptal rescue flap). The four age groups were ≤ 30, 31-45, 46-60, and ≥ 61 years. Patients underwent preoperative olfactory function evaluation using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Test (CCCRC), and the Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT). Repeat testing was performed 6-months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients who underwent binostril four-hand EETSA were included in this study. In both groups A and B, the olfactory function was significantly decreased according to CCCRC and CCSIT scores (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). The symptom scores and olfactory test results were significantly changed in >30-year-old patients who had undergone EETSA. CONCLUSION: EETSA might contribute to olfactory dysfunction independent of surgery type. In addition, age may affect the restoration of olfaction after EETSA. Patients who plan to undergo EETSA must be informed that their olfaction may be impaired. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The increased number of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches (EETSA) has been associated with sinonasal complications such as olfactory dysfunction. Current studies have compared preoperative and postoperative olfactory function according to surgical type and age. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records at a tertiary referral center. METHODS:Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical type and into four groups according to age. The two surgical groups were defined based on the bilateral nasoseptal flap technique (group A: right conventional nasoseptal flap and left modified nasoseptal rescure flap; group B: bilateral modified nasoseptal rescue flap). The four age groups were ≤ 30, 31-45, 46-60, and ≥ 61 years. Patients underwent preoperative olfactory function evaluation using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Test (CCCRC), and the Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT). Repeat testing was performed 6-months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 226 patients who underwent binostril four-hand EETSA were included in this study. In both groups A and B, the olfactory function was significantly decreased according to CCCRC and CCSIT scores (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). The symptom scores and olfactory test results were significantly changed in >30-year-old patients who had undergone EETSA. CONCLUSION: EETSA might contribute to olfactory dysfunction independent of surgery type. In addition, age may affect the restoration of olfaction after EETSA. Patients who plan to undergo EETSA must be informed that their olfaction may be impaired. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Authors: Arturo Sotomayor-González; Armando José Díaz-Martínez; Ramón Radillo-Gil; Everardo García-Estrada; Jesús Alberto Morales-Gómez; Isaac Jair Palacios-Ortiz; Samuel Pérez-Cárdenas; Mauricio Arteaga-Treviño; Ángel Martínez-Ponce De León Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2016-12-01
Authors: Carol H Yan; Aakanksha Rathor; Kaelyn Krook; Yifei Ma; Melissa R Rotella; Robert L Dodd; Peter H Hwang; Jayakar V Nayak; Nelson M Oyesiku; John M DelGaudio; Joshua M Levy; Justin Wise; Sarah K Wise; Zara M Patel Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Do Hyun Kim; Yong-Kil Hong; Sin-Soo Jeun; Yong Jin Park; Soo Whan Kim; Jin Hee Cho; Boo Young Kim; Sungwoo Han; Yong Joo Lee; Jae Hyung Hwang; Sung Won Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240