Literature DB >> 24623501

Good vs. poor self-rated diabetes control: differences in cardiovascular risk and self-care activities.

K J Smith1, R Rabasa-Lhoret2, I Strychar3, A D Karelis2, M Clyde1, J Levasseur2, C Pinaroc2, M Pedneault4, N Schmitz1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiovascular risk and performance of self-care activities in people who rated their diabetes control as good or poor.
METHODS: A sub-sample of 77 participants who took part in the Evaluation of Diabetes Treatment telephone interview were invited into a clinic to complete a series of laboratory examinations. Self-rated diabetes control was validated using the following laboratory markers: HbA1c, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and LDL cholesterol. Differences in blood pressure and BMI were also assessed. Finally, all participants also completed the Summary of Self-Care activities questionnaire.
RESULTS: Those people who rated their diabetes control as fair or poor had a significantly higher BMI, HbA1c levels, total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio and systolic blood pressure. When asked about self-care activities in the past week, those people who reported their diabetes control was fair/poor had spent significantly fewer days following a general diet and exercising.
CONCLUSIONS: People with poor self-rated diabetes control have unfavourable cardiovascular risk and decreased performance of self-care activities. © J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623501     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes        ISSN: 0947-7349            Impact factor:   2.949


  4 in total

1.  Total/high density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (re)hospitalization nadir in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Dahai Yu; Yamei Cai; Rui Qin; Jonathan Graffy; Daniel Holman; Zhanzheng Zhao; David Simmons
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.922

2.  Assessing Diabetes Self-Management with the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) Can Help Analyse Behavioural Problems Related to Reduced Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Andreas Schmitt; André Reimer; Norbert Hermanns; Jörg Huber; Dominic Ehrmann; Sabine Schall; Bernhard Kulzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prevalence of lipohypertrophy in insulin-treated diabetes patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nan Deng; Xiaoyi Zhang; Fangfang Zhao; Ya Wang; Hong He
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.232

4.  Identifying Factors Associated with Functional Limitation Among Diabetic Patients in Northwest of Iran: Application of the Generalized Additive Model.

Authors:  Leili Faraji Gavgani; Parvin Sarbakhsh; Mohamad Asghari Jafarabadi; Seyed Morteza Shamshirgaran; Leila Jahangiry
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.