Literature DB >> 24623365

Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time.

Hyun Cheol Kim1, Dal Mo Yang, Sang Won Kim, Seong Jin Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the prediction of perforation site according to each gastrointestinal (GI) tract site and elapsed time.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients who underwent MDCT before laparotomy for GI tract perforation were enrolled and allocated to an early or late lapse group based on an elapsed time of 7 h. Two reviewers independently evaluated the perforation site and assessed the following CT findings: free air location, mottled extraluminal air bubbles, focal bowel wall discontinuity, segmental bowel wall thickening, perivisceral fat stranding and localised fluid collection.
RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy was 91.07 % and 91.67 % for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively, with excellent agreement (kappa 0.86). Accuracies (98.97 % and 97.94 %) and agreements (kappa 0.894) for stomach and duodenum perforation were higher than for other perforation sites. Strong predictors of perforation at each site were: focal bowel wall discontinuity for stomach, duodenal bulb and left colon, mottled extraluminal air bubbles for retroperitoneal duodenum and right colon, and segmental bowel wall thickening for small bowel. The diagnostic accuracy was not different between the early- and late-lapse groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT can accurately predict upper GI tract perforation with high reliability. Elapsed time did not affect the accuracy of perforation site prediction. KEY POINTS: Perforation of the stomach and duodenum can be accurately predicted with MDCT. Knowledge of CT findings predicting perforation site can improve diagnostic accuracy. Elapsed time does not significantly affect accuracy in predicting perforation sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623365     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3115-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of imaging for abdominal perforation.

Authors:  J P Singh; M J Steward; T C Booth; H Mukhtar; D Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The accuracy of 64-slice MDCT for determining the perforation site of the gastrointestinal tract: ROC analysis.

Authors:  Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Suk Hee Heo; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2011-10

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause.

Authors:  A Furukawa; M Sakoda; M Yamasaki; N Kono; T Tanaka; N Nitta; S Kanasaki; K Imoto; M Takahashi; K Murata; T Sakamoto; T Tani
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

4.  Distinction between upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation: usefulness of the periportal free air sign on computed tomography.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Cho; Seong Eon Yoon; Seong Hoon Park; Hyewon Kim; Young-Hwan Lee; Kwon-Ha Yoon
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  What determines the periportal free air, and ligamentum teres and falciform ligament signs on CT: can these specific air distributions be valuable predictors of gastroduodenal perforation?

Authors:  A Lam Choi; Kyung Mi Jang; Min-Jeong Kim; Sung Hye Koh; Yul Lee; Kwangseon Min; Dongil Choi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  64-Slice multidetector computed tomography evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation site: detectability of direct findings in upper and lower GI tract.

Authors:  Sota Oguro; Tomohiro Funabiki; Koji Hosoda; Yukio Inoue; Takashi Yamane; Michihiro Sato; Mitsuhide Kitano; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Perforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with computed tomography.

Authors:  V Maniatis; H Chryssikopoulos; A Roussakis; C Kalamara; S Kavadias; A Papadopoulos; J Andreou; K Stringaris
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

8.  Multidetector CT findings suggesting a perforation site in the gastrointestinal tract: analysis in surgically confirmed 155 patients.

Authors:  Masanori Imuta; Kazuo Awai; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Yuka Murata; Chiaki Asao; Tetsuya Matsukawa; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-04-27

9.  Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations: indications and guidelines.

Authors:  Adam J Hansen; Deron J Tessier; Monte L Anderson; Richard T Schlinkert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Direct visualization of perforation sites in patients with a non-traumatic free pneumoperitoneum: added diagnostic value of thin transverse slices and coronal and sagittal reformations for multi-detector CT.

Authors:  Olivier Ghekiere; Alvian Lesnik; Ingrid Millet; Denis Hoa; Françoise Guillon; Patrice Taourel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  10 in total

1.  Can multidetector CT detect the site of gastrointestinal tract injury in trauma? - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ananya Panda; Atin Kumar; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Ranjita Das; Swati Paliwal; Amit Gupta; Subodh Kumar
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

Review 3.  Noncontrast MRI of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal lesions: indications, protocol, and image interpretation.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Shinichi Ota; Norihisa Nitta; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  The emergency room diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract perforation: the role of CT.

Authors:  Samuel Borofsky; Myles Taffel; Nadia Khati; Robert Zeman; Michael Hill
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-11-23

5.  Accuracy of specific free air distributions in predicting the localization of gastrointestinal perforations.

Authors:  Hakki Celik; Mehmet Akif Kamar; Canan Altay; Isil Basara Akin; Mustafa Secil
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 6.  Liver Trauma: Until When We Have to Delay Surgery? A Review.

Authors:  Inés Cañas García; Julio Santoyo Villalba; Domenico Iovino; Caterina Franchi; Valentina Iori; Giuseppe Pettinato; Davide Inversini; Francesco Amico; Giuseppe Ietto
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

7.  Natural History of Pneumoperitoneum After Laparotomy: Findings on Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Brice Malgras; Vinciane Placé; Anthony Dohan; Réa Lo Dico; Sandrine Duron; Philippe Soyer; Marc Pocard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Acute abdomen - gastrointestinal causes].

Authors:  V Schwarze; C Marschner; C Schulz; F Streitparth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Evaluation of risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kazuki Yamamoto; Osamu Takahashi; Hiroko Arioka; Daiki Kobayashi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Clinical characteristics of pneumoperitoneum with pneumatosis intestinalis detected using computed tomography: A descriptive study.

Authors:  Wataru Adachi; Tomohito Matsushita; Yasuaki Yashiro; Jiro Imura; Hideki Shiozawa; Kyo Kishimoto
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.