Literature DB >> 24623169

Initial experience with routine less invasive implantation of HeartMate II left ventricular assist device without median sternotomy.

Anelechi C Anyanwu1, Shinobu Itagaki2, Sean Pinney3, David H Adams2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Standard implantation of HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device requires an extended median sternotomy; this incision, while generally well tolerated, may add morbidity in critically ill debilitated patients. We recently adopted a sternum sparing technique for routine HMII implants using a left subcostal incision to create a pocket and access the left ventricular apex, and a right minithoracotomy to access the ascending aorta.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 40 consecutive patients (M:F 32 : 8; age range 48-77 years; Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support 1 = 8; 2 = 10; 3 or 4 = 22) who underwent implantation of HMII using a non-sternotomy approach in a single institution.
RESULTS: HMII insertion was completed with the less invasive technique in all cases with no conversions to full sternotomy. There were no reoperations for bleeding and 70% of patients did not have any intraoperative blood product transfusion. No patient required right ventricular assist device support. Majority of patients (80%) were extubated by postoperative day 1. There were no wound, mediastinal or pocket infections. One patient suffered a new perioperative stroke. Median postoperative hospital stay was 19 days. Operative mortality was 7.5% and 12-month actuarial survival was 86 ± 6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary HMII implantation without median sternotomy is feasible and can be safely, effectively and routinely applied, using our less invasive approach. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether the non-invasive technique contributed to the low incidence of bleeding, blood transfusion, respiratory morbidity and right ventricular failure seen in this study.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood transfusion; Left ventricular assist device; Minimally invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623169     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive is the future of left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  George Makdisi; I-Wen Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Technique for implantation of HeartMate II left ventricular assist device with concurrent mitral and tricuspid valve repair.

Authors:  Amit Pawale; Irina Plotkina; Anelechi C Anyanwu
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

3.  Less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation-a match changer!

Authors:  David C Reineke; Thierry P Carrel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review.

Authors:  Supriya Shore; Michael J Pienta; Tessa M F Watt; Gardner Yost; Whitney A Townsend; Lourdes Cabrera; Michael D Fetters; Carol Chenoweth; Keith D Aaronson; Francis D Pagani; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 13.569

Review 5.  Minimally invasive versus conventional continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bufan Zhang; Shaohua Guo; Zean Fu; Zhigang Liu
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Rates and types of infections in left ventricular assist device recipients: A scoping review.

Authors:  Michael Pienta; Supriya Shore; Francis D Pagani; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.