Literature DB >> 24623093

Alignment of nematic and bundled semiflexible polymers in cell-sized confinement.

José Alvarado1, Bela M Mulder, Gijsje H Koenderink.   

Abstract

The finite size of cells poses severe spatial constraints on the network of semiflexible filaments called the cytoskeleton, a main determinant of cell shape. At the same time, the high packing density of cytoskeletal filaments poses mutual packing constraints. Here we investigate the competition between excluded volume interactions in the bulk and surface packing constraints on the orientational ordering of confined actin filaments as a function of filament density and the presence of crosslinks. We grow fluorescently labeled actin filaments in shallow (thickness dz 3 μm), rectangular microchambers with a systematically varied length (dy between 5 and 100 μm) and in-plane aspect ratio (dx/dy between 1 and 10). We determine the nematic director field by image analysis of fluorescence confocal images. We find that high-density (nematic) solutions respond sensitively to changes in the size and aspect ratio of the chambers. In small chambers (dy ≤ 20 μm), filaments align parallel to the long walls as soon as the aspect ratio is ≥1.5, indicating that surface-induced ordering dominates. In larger chambers, the filaments instead align along the chamber diagonal, indicating that bulk packing constraints dominate. The nematic order parameter is maximal in small and highly anisometric chambers. In contrast to the nematic solutions, low-density (isotropic) solutions are rather insensitive to confinement. Bundled actin solutions behave similarly to nematic solutions, but are less well-ordered. Our observations imply that the orientational order of actin filaments in flat confining geometries is primarily determined by a balance between bulk and surface packing constraints with a minimal effect of the enthalpic cost of filament bending. Our assay provides an interesting platform for the future reconstitution of more complex, active cytoskeletal systems with actively treadmilling filaments or molecular motors.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623093     DOI: 10.1039/c3sm52421c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  7 in total

Review 1.  Actin-microtubule crosstalk in cell biology.

Authors:  Marileen Dogterom; Gijsje H Koenderink
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Taming active turbulence with patterned soft interfaces.

Authors:  P Guillamat; J Ignés-Mullol; F Sagués
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Shape and Size Control of Artificial Cells for Bottom-Up Biology.

Authors:  Federico Fanalista; Anthony Birnie; Renu Maan; Federica Burla; Kevin Charles; Grzegorz Pawlik; Siddharth Deshpande; Gijsje H Koenderink; Marileen Dogterom; Cees Dekker
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Large and stable: actin aster networks formed via entropic forces.

Authors:  Friedrich Fabian Spukti; Jörg Schnauß
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.545

5.  SOAX: a software for quantification of 3D biopolymer networks.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Dimitrios Vavylonis; Feng-Ching Tsai; Gijsje H Koenderink; Wei Nie; Eddy Yusuf; Jian-Qiu Wu; Xiaolei Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sensing surface mechanical deformation using active probes driven by motor proteins.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Takahiro Nitta; Arif Md Rashedul Kabir; Kazuki Sada; Jian Ping Gong; Akihiko Konagaya; Akira Kakugo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The Precision Control of Autophagic Flux and Vesicle Dynamics-A Micropattern Approach.

Authors:  André du Toit; Sholto De Wet; Jan-Hendrik S Hofmeyr; Kristian K Müller-Nedebock; Ben Loos
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.