Literature DB >> 24623062

Predicting potential liver toxicity from phase 2 data: a case study with ximelagatran.

Harry Southworth1.   

Abstract

Ximelagatran was denied marketing approval in the USA and was withdrawn from those markets in which it had been approved, because of concerns over potential liver toxicity. A retrospective analysis of phase 2 data relating to liver toxicity is performed using the methods of extreme value modelling. The analysis reveals that the phase 2 data were predictive of the phase 3 results and, had the methods been available at the time, such analysis would have provided valuable information relating to the decision to proceed with further development of the compound.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug safety; extreme value modelling; generalized Pareto distribution; liver toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623062     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

Review 1.  Using new oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Anne R Bass
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Bleeding in patients receiving non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants: clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Arthur Bracey; Wassim Shatila; James Wilson
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-09-30

3.  HLA-DR7 and HLA-DQ2: Transgenic mouse strains tested as a model system for ximelagatran hepatotoxicity.

Authors:  Hanna Lundgren; Klara Martinsson; Karin Cederbrant; Johan Jirholt; Daniel Mucs; Katja Madeyski-Bengtson; Said Havarinasab; Per Hultman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A novel phenotype-based drug-induced liver injury causality assessment tool (DILI-CAT) allows for signal confirmation in early drug development.

Authors:  Richard P Hermann; Don C Rockey; Ayako Suzuki; Michael Merz; Hans L Tillmann
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 9.524

5.  Good Signal Detection Practices: Evidence from IMI PROTECT.

Authors:  Antoni F Z Wisniewski; Andrew Bate; Cedric Bousquet; Andreas Brueckner; Gianmario Candore; Kristina Juhlin; Miguel A Macia-Martinez; Katrin Manlik; Naashika Quarcoo; Suzie Seabroke; Jim Slattery; Harry Southworth; Bharat Thakrar; Phil Tregunno; Lionel Van Holle; Michael Kayser; G Niklas Norén
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.