Literature DB >> 24623001

Perfect nematic order in confined monolayers of spindle-shaped cells.

G Duclos1, S Garcia, H G Yevick, P Silberzan.   

Abstract

Elongated, weakly interacting, apolar, fibroblast cells (mouse fibroblasts NIH-3T3) cultured at confluence align together, forming large domains (correlation length ∼ 500 μm) where they are perfectly ordered. We study the emergence of this mesoscopic nematic order by quantifying the ordering dynamics in a two-dimensional tissue. Cells are initially very motile and the monolayer is characterized by anomalous density fluctuations, a signature of far-from-equilibrium systems. As the cell density increases because of proliferation, the cells align with each other forming these large oriented domains while, at the same time, the cellular movements and the density fluctuations freeze. Topological defects that are characteristic of nematic phases remain trapped at long times thereby preventing the development of infinite domains. When confined within adhesive stripes of given widths (from 30 μm to 1.5 mm) cells spontaneously align with the domain edges. This orientation then propagates toward the pattern center. For widths smaller than the orientation correlation length, cells perfectly align in the direction of the stripe. Experiments performed in cross-shaped patterns show that in the situation of two competing populations, both the number of cells and the degree of alignment impact the final orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623001     DOI: 10.1039/c3sm52323c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  47 in total

1.  Physics of active jamming during collective cellular motion in a monolayer.

Authors:  Simon Garcia; Edouard Hannezo; Jens Elgeti; Jean-François Joanny; Pascal Silberzan; Nir S Gov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Dynamics phenotyping across length and time scales in collective cell migration.

Authors:  Rachel M Lee; Wolfgang Losert
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Micro-scale and meso-scale architectural cues cooperate and compete to direct aligned tissue formation.

Authors:  Christopher L Gilchrist; David S Ruch; Dianne Little; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Phase separation and emergent structures in an active nematic fluid.

Authors:  Elias Putzig; Aparna Baskaran
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-10-08

5.  Colloquium: Mechanical formalisms for tissue dynamics.

Authors:  Sham Tlili; Cyprien Gay; François Graner; Philippe Marcq; François Molino; Pierre Saramito
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Defect dynamics in active nematics.

Authors:  Luca Giomi; Mark J Bowick; Prashant Mishra; Rastko Sknepnek; M Cristina Marchetti
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Perspectives in active liquid crystals.

Authors:  Apala Majumdar; Marchetti M Cristina; Epifanio G Virga
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Cell Volume Fluctuations in MDCK Monolayers.

Authors:  Steven M Zehnder; Melanie Suaris; Madisonclaire M Bellaire; Thomas E Angelini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Multi-Material Tissue Engineering Scaffold with Hierarchical Pore Architecture.

Authors:  Kathy Ye Morgan; Demetra Sklaviadis; Zachary L Tochka; Kristin M Fischer; Keith Hearon; Thomas D Morgan; Robert Langer; Lisa E Freed
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 18.808

10.  Orientational order of motile defects in active nematics.

Authors:  Stephen J DeCamp; Gabriel S Redner; Aparna Baskaran; Michael F Hagan; Zvonimir Dogic
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 43.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.