UNLABELLED: Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) were studied on 15 pacemakers (standard single chamber n = 5, dual chamber n = 6, rate responsive single chamber [Activitrax] n = 4). In-vitro testing involved suspending the pacemakers in a bath of degassified, deionized water firmly taped to a platform at the point of maximal pressure, i.e., second focal point (F2), where they received pressure shocks (means = 1300) from the HM3 Dornier lithotriptor. The pacemakers, programmed to their most sensitive setting, were continuously pacing at nominal outputs (atrial and ventricular pacing in the DDD mode). All units were assessed by a pacing system analyzer before and after the study, then underwent destructive analysis. During standard single chamber pacing (VVI) the pacing stimulus triggered ESWL. For dual chamber devices, ESWL was triggered by the atrial paced event which induced inhibition of the ventricular output in two pacemaker. This was eliminated by reprogramming to a less sensitive setting. The pacemaker can, hermetic seal and internal circuitry were undamaged in all units. Two rate responsive single chamber pacemakers had their activity sensing piezoelectric elements shattered when placed at F2. Two other units placed 5 cm from F2 were stimulated to their maximum upper programmed pacing rate with ESWL therapy, but were otherwise unaffected. Subsequent to this study, six patients with pacemakers programmed to the VVI (five), DDD (one) modes implanted in the thorax underwent successful ESWL without pacemaker or arrhythmic event. CONCLUSIONS: (A) It is generally safe for patients implanted with standard single chamber devices in a ventricular application to undergo ESWL without modifying the pacing/sensing parameters. (B) Patients implanted with dual chamber devices who pace in the atrium should be reprogrammed to the VVI mode during ESWL. (C) Patients with piezoelectric activity sensing rate responsive single chamber pacemakers should have this feature programmed off during ESWL and, if implanted in the abdomen, probably should not undergo ESWL.
UNLABELLED: Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) were studied on 15 pacemakers (standard single chamber n = 5, dual chamber n = 6, rate responsive single chamber [Activitrax] n = 4). In-vitro testing involved suspending the pacemakers in a bath of degassified, deionized water firmly taped to a platform at the point of maximal pressure, i.e., second focal point (F2), where they received pressure shocks (means = 1300) from the HM3 Dornier lithotriptor. The pacemakers, programmed to their most sensitive setting, were continuously pacing at nominal outputs (atrial and ventricular pacing in the DDD mode). All units were assessed by a pacing system analyzer before and after the study, then underwent destructive analysis. During standard single chamber pacing (VVI) the pacing stimulus triggered ESWL. For dual chamber devices, ESWL was triggered by the atrial paced event which induced inhibition of the ventricular output in two pacemaker. This was eliminated by reprogramming to a less sensitive setting. The pacemaker can, hermetic seal and internal circuitry were undamaged in all units. Two rate responsive single chamber pacemakers had their activity sensing piezoelectric elements shattered when placed at F2. Two other units placed 5 cm from F2 were stimulated to their maximum upper programmed pacing rate with ESWL therapy, but were otherwise unaffected. Subsequent to this study, six patients with pacemakers programmed to the VVI (five), DDD (one) modes implanted in the thorax underwent successful ESWL without pacemaker or arrhythmic event. CONCLUSIONS: (A) It is generally safe for patients implanted with standard single chamber devices in a ventricular application to undergo ESWL without modifying the pacing/sensing parameters. (B) Patients implanted with dual chamber devices who pace in the atrium should be reprogrammed to the VVI mode during ESWL. (C) Patients with piezoelectric activity sensing rate responsive single chamber pacemakers should have this feature programmed off during ESWL and, if implanted in the abdomen, probably should not undergo ESWL.