Erik A B Buijs1, Irwin K M Reiss, Ulrike Kraemer, Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou, Alexandra J M Zwiers, Can Ince, Dick Tibboel. 1. 1Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2Division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study whether dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine improve not only mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate but also microcirculatory perfusion in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study from November 2009 to July 2012. SETTING: ICU of a level III university children's hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight consecutive congenital diaphragmatic hernia newborns of whom seven did not receive any catecholaminergic support and 21 received dopamine as the drug of first choice. Fourteen of the latter also received either norepinephrine or epinephrine in addition to dopamine. Twenty-eight healthy neonates, matched for gestational age, postnatal age, and gender, served as controls. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained before and after dopamine start and before and after norepinephrine or epinephrine start in case it was given. For the congenital diaphragmatic hernia without catecholaminergic support, data were obtained at admission days 1 and 2 and for the controls on day 1 of life. The buccal microcirculation was studied using Sidestream Dark Field imaging. Also macrocirculatory, respiratory, and biochemical variables were collected. Mean arterial blood pressure had improved after dopamine start, whereas the microcirculation had not. After the start of either norepinephrine or epinephrine, both blood pressure and heart rate had increased. However, the microcirculation failed to improve again. The microcirculation in the healthy controls was better than that in the congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients with catecholaminergic support. After cutoff values for abnormal microcirculation had been defined, abnormal microcirculation after dopamine start predicted the need for additional catecholaminergic support (area under the curve, 0.74-0.88; sensitivity, 77-77%; specificity, 69-77%). Likewise, microcirculatory impairment was associated with the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Catecholaminergic drug support with dopamine, norepinephrine, and/or epinephrine improved macrocirculatory function but did not improve the microcirculation in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The microcirculation was not only impaired but it also predicted poor outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To study whether dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine improve not only mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate but also microcirculatory perfusion in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study from November 2009 to July 2012. SETTING: ICU of a level III university children's hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight consecutive congenital diaphragmatic hernia newborns of whom seven did not receive any catecholaminergic support and 21 received dopamine as the drug of first choice. Fourteen of the latter also received either norepinephrine or epinephrine in addition to dopamine. Twenty-eight healthy neonates, matched for gestational age, postnatal age, and gender, served as controls. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained before and after dopamine start and before and after norepinephrine or epinephrine start in case it was given. For the congenital diaphragmatic hernia without catecholaminergic support, data were obtained at admission days 1 and 2 and for the controls on day 1 of life. The buccal microcirculation was studied using Sidestream Dark Field imaging. Also macrocirculatory, respiratory, and biochemical variables were collected. Mean arterial blood pressure had improved after dopamine start, whereas the microcirculation had not. After the start of either norepinephrine or epinephrine, both blood pressure and heart rate had increased. However, the microcirculation failed to improve again. The microcirculation in the healthy controls was better than that in the congenital diaphragmatic herniapatients with catecholaminergic support. After cutoff values for abnormal microcirculation had been defined, abnormal microcirculation after dopamine start predicted the need for additional catecholaminergic support (area under the curve, 0.74-0.88; sensitivity, 77-77%; specificity, 69-77%). Likewise, microcirculatory impairment was associated with the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Catecholaminergic drug support with dopamine, norepinephrine, and/or epinephrine improved macrocirculatory function but did not improve the microcirculation in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The microcirculation was not only impaired but it also predicted poor outcome.
Authors: Pramod Puligandla; Erik Skarsgard; Martin Offringa; Ian Adatia; Robert Baird; Michelle Bailey; Mary Brindle; Priscilla Chiu; Arthur Cogswell; Shyamala Dakshinamurti; Hélène Flageole; Richard Keijzer; Douglas McMillan; Titilayo Oluyomi-Obi; Thomas Pennaforte; Thérèse Perreault; Bruno Piedboeuf; S. Patricia Riley; Greg Ryan; Anne Synnes; Michael Traynor Journal: CMAJ Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Can Ince; E Christiaan Boerma; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Nathan I Shapiro; Jacques Duranteau; Michael R Pinsky; Antonio Artigas; Jean-Louis Teboul; Irwin K M Reiss; Cesar Aldecoa; Sam D Hutchings; Abele Donati; Marco Maggiorini; Fabio S Taccone; Glenn Hernandez; Didier Payen; Dick Tibboel; Daniel S Martin; Alexander Zarbock; Xavier Monnet; Arnaldo Dubin; Jan Bakker; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W L Scheeren Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Norani H Gangaram-Panday; Louwrina H Te Nijenhuis; Ilya Fine; Irwin K M Reiss; Willem van Weteringen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 4.996