Jinkook Lee1, Regina Shih2, Kevin Feeney2, Kenneth M Langa3. 1. Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California and RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. jinkook.lee@usc.edu. 2. RAND Corporation, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Gerontology, and Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine gender disparities in cognitive functioning in India and the extent to which education explains this disparity in later life. METHODS: This study uses baseline interviews of a prospective cohort study of 1,451 community-residing adults 45 years of age or older in four geographically diverse states of India (Karnataka, Kerala, Punjab, Rajasthan). Data collected during home visits includes cognitive performance tests, and rich sociodemographic, health, and psychosocial variables. The cognitive performance tests include episodic memory, numeracy, and a modified version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS: We find gender disparity in cognitive function in India, and this disparity is greater in the north than the south. We also find that gender disparities in educational attainment, health, and social and economic activity explain the female cognitive disadvantage in later life. DISCUSSION: We report significant gender disparities in cognitive functioning among older Indian adults, which differ from gender disparities in cognition encountered in developed countries. Our models controlling for education, health status, and social and economic activity explain the disparity in southern India but not the region-specific disparity in the northern India. North Indian women may face additional sources of stress associated with discrimination against women that contribute to persistent disadvantages in cognitive functioning at older ages.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To examine gender disparities in cognitive functioning in India and the extent to which education explains this disparity in later life. METHODS: This study uses baseline interviews of a prospective cohort study of 1,451 community-residing adults 45 years of age or older in four geographically diverse states of India (Karnataka, Kerala, Punjab, Rajasthan). Data collected during home visits includes cognitive performance tests, and rich sociodemographic, health, and psychosocial variables. The cognitive performance tests include episodic memory, numeracy, and a modified version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS: We find gender disparity in cognitive function in India, and this disparity is greater in the north than the south. We also find that gender disparities in educational attainment, health, and social and economic activity explain the female cognitive disadvantage in later life. DISCUSSION: We report significant gender disparities in cognitive functioning among older Indian adults, which differ from gender disparities in cognition encountered in developed countries. Our models controlling for education, health status, and social and economic activity explain the disparity in southern India but not the region-specific disparity in the northern India. North Indian women may face additional sources of stress associated with discrimination against women that contribute to persistent disadvantages in cognitive functioning at older ages.
Authors: M Ganguli; V Chandra; J E Gilby; G Ratcliff; S D Sharma; R Pandav; E C Seaberg; S Belle Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 1996 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: M P van Boxtel; F Buntinx; P J Houx; J F Metsemakers; A Knottnerus; J Jolles Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L F Berkman; T E Seeman; M Albert; D Blazer; R Kahn; R Mohs; C Finch; E Schneider; C Cotman; G McClearn Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: J C Breitner; K A Welsh; B A Gau; W M McDonald; D C Steffens; A M Saunders; K M Magruder; M J Helms; B L Plassman; M F Folstein Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1995-08
Authors: Lindsay C Kobayashi; M Maria Glymour; Kathleen Kahn; Collin F Payne; Ryan G Wagner; Livia Montana; Farrah J Mateen; Stephen M Tollman; Lisa F Berkman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Meagan T Farrell; Lindsay C Kobayashi; Livia Montana; Ryan G Wagner; Nele Demeyere; Lisa Berkman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Darren M Lipnicki; John D Crawford; Rajib Dutta; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Nicole A Kochan; Gavin Andrews; M Fernanda Lima-Costa; Erico Castro-Costa; Carol Brayne; Fiona E Matthews; Blossom C M Stephan; Richard B Lipton; Mindy J Katz; Karen Ritchie; Jacqueline Scali; Marie-Laure Ancelin; Nikolaos Scarmeas; Mary Yannakoulia; Efthimios Dardiotis; Linda C W Lam; Candy H Y Wong; Ada W T Fung; Antonio Guaita; Roberta Vaccaro; Annalisa Davin; Ki Woong Kim; Ji Won Han; Tae Hui Kim; Kaarin J Anstey; Nicolas Cherbuin; Peter Butterworth; Marcia Scazufca; Shuzo Kumagai; Sanmei Chen; Kenji Narazaki; Tze Pin Ng; Qi Gao; Simone Reppermund; Henry Brodaty; Antonio Lobo; Raúl Lopez-Anton; Javier Santabárbara; Perminder S Sachdev Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 11.069