Literature DB >> 24622003

Survival of patients with biventricular devices after device infection, extraction, and reimplantation.

John Rickard1, Khaldoun Tarakji2, Alan Cheng3, David Spragg3, Daniel J Cantillon2, David O Martin2, Bryan Baranowski2, Steven M Gordon4, W H Wilson Tang2, Mohammed Kanj2, Oussama Wazni2, Bruce L Wilkoff2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare outcomes in patients with biventricular device infections who undergo successful treatment including extraction and reimplantation to patients with biventricular devices never known to become infected.
BACKGROUND: Infection of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Survival in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device infections undergoing full system extraction is unknown.
METHODS: We extracted data on all patients undergoing extraction of a biventricular pacing device for an infectious indication at the Cleveland Clinic between February 16, 2000, and June 30, 2011. Survival of patients who presented with a CRT device infection, extraction, and successful reimplantation was compared to that of a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing initial CRT implantation without a known history of subsequent device-related infection. In addition, long-term outcomes were compared between patients who were extracted and deemed to be cured with and without successful biventricular device reimplantation.
RESULTS: In all, 151 patients underwent biventricular device extraction for infection, of whom 81 were successfully reimplanted. The noninfected cohort consisted of 879 patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model controlling for sex, a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy, creatinine, hemoglobin, beta-blocker use, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use, and diuretic use, no significant association between subsequent infection with reimplantation and all-cause mortality was noted (p = 0.21). There was a trend toward worse outcomes for patients extracted, deemed cured, and not reimplanted compared to patients with successful CRT reimplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a biventricular device infection who are successfully extracted, treated with antibiotics, and reimplanted with a biventricular device have outcomes similar to those of patients with biventricular devices not known to have become infected.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization; device infection; extraction; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24622003     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of infected cardiovascular implantable devices in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Oluwaseun Opelami; Ankit Sakhuja; Xiaobo Liu; W H Wilson Tang; Jesse D Schold; Sankar D Navaneethan
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.754

2.  Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection.

Authors:  Cristian Podoleanu; Jean-Claude Deharo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

3.  Microbiological Characteristics and Clinical Features of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections at a Tertiary Hospital in China.

Authors:  Ruobing Wang; Xuebin Li; Qi Wang; Yawei Zhang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Authors:  Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Vassil Traykov; Paola Anna Erba; Haran Burri; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Jeanne Poole; Giuseppe Boriani; Roberto Costa; Jean-Claude Deharo; Laurence M Epstein; Laszlo Saghy; Ulrika Snygg-Martin; Christoph Starck; Carlo Tascini; Neil Strathmore
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Derek Chew; Ranjani Somayaji; John Conly; Derek Exner; Elissa Rennert-May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Percutaneous Lead Extraction in Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antônio da Silva Menezes Júnior; Thaís Rodrigues Magalhães; Alana de Oliveira Alarcão Morais
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.