Literature DB >> 24621933

Effect of amlodipine on the survival of patients with severe chronic heart failure due to a nonischemic cardiomyopathy: results of the PRAISE-2 study (prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation 2).

Milton Packer1, Peter Carson2, Uri Elkayam2, Marvin A Konstam2, Gordon Moe2, Christopher O'Connor2, Jean-Lucien Rouleau2, Douglas Schocken2, Susan A Anderson2, David L DeMets2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to test the hypothesis of whether amlodipine reduces the risk for death in patients with heart failure due to a nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: A pre-specified subgroup analysis in an earlier, large-scale, placebo-controlled study suggested that amlodipine might reduce the risk for death in patients with heart failure due to a nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: To evaluate this hypothesis, 1654 patients with severe heart failure due to a nonischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction <30%) were randomly assigned to amlodipine (target dose: 10 mg/d) or placebo added to conventional therapy for heart failure for a median of 33 months.
RESULTS: There were 278 deaths in the amlodipine group and 262 deaths in the placebo group (hazard ratio: 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92 to 1.29; p = 0.33). The differences between the 2 groups in the risks for cardiovascular death and hospitalization were also not significant. When the results from patients with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy in both the earlier trial and in the current study were combined, there was no evidence of a favorable or unfavorable effect of amlodipine on mortality (hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.13; p = 0.66). Both trials, however, observed higher frequencies of peripheral edema and pulmonary edema and lower frequencies of uncontrolled hypertension and chest pain in patients treated with amlodipine.
CONCLUSIONS: These results of the current trial, viewed together with the results from the earlier study, indicate that amlodipine does not exert favorable effects on the clinical course of patients with heart failure, regardless of the presence or absence of underlying coronary artery disease. These findings indicate the need for great caution when striking benefits are observed in subgroups of patients or in trials not primarily designed to assess such effects.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amlodipine; clinical trials; heart failure; nonischemic cardiomyopathy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24621933     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  18 in total

Review 1.  LCZ696: the next step in improving RAS inhibition?

Authors:  Alan H Gradman
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Pharmacologic Management of Cancer Therapeutics-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Adult Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  J Emanuel Finet; Gregory A Wiggers
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-08

3.  Calcium channel blockers and outcomes in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kanan Patel; Gregg C Fonarow; Momanna Ahmed; Charity Morgan; Meredith Kilgore; Thomas E Love; Prakash Deedwania; Wilbert S Aronow; Stefan D Anker; Ali Ahmed
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Nutritional screening based on the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score at the time of admission is useful for long-term prognostic prediction in patients with heart failure requiring hospitalization.

Authors:  Isao Nishi; Yoshihiro Seo; Yoshie Hamada-Harimura; Kimi Sato; Seika Sai; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Tomoko Ishizu; Akinori Sugano; Kenichi Obara; Longmei Wu; Shoji Suzuki; Akira Koike; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Albert Youngwoo Jang; Su Jung Park; Wook-Jin Chung
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2021-04-21

Review 6.  Calcium Channel Blockers Co-prescribed with Loop Diuretics: A Potential Marker of Poor Prescribing?

Authors:  Henry J Woodford
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Meaghan Lunney; Marinella Ruospo; Patrizia Natale; Robert R Quinn; Paul E Ronksley; Ioannis Konstantinidis; Suetonia C Palmer; Marcello Tonelli; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Pietro Ravani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

8.  Is amlodipine more cardioprotective than other antihypertensive drug classes?

Authors:  Chang Gyu Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Aberrant Splicing Promotes Proteasomal Degradation of L-type CaV1.2 Calcium Channels by Competitive Binding for CaVβ Subunits in Cardiac Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Zhenyu Hu; Jiong-Wei Wang; Dejie Yu; Jia Lin Soon; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Roger Foo; Ping Liao; Henry M Colecraft; Tuck Wah Soong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Amlodipine in hypertension: a first-line agent with efficacy for improving blood pressure and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Hassan Fares; James J DiNicolantonio; James H O'Keefe; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.