Literature DB >> 24621508

Cell cycle synchronization of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells and the generation of cloned embryos.

Ye Yuan1, Kiho Lee2, Kwang-Wook Park3, Lee D Spate2, Randall S Prather2, Kevin D Wells2, R Michael Roberts1.   

Abstract

Nuclear transfer (NT) from porcine iPSC to create cloned piglets is unusually inefficient. Here we examined whether such failure might be related to the cell cycle stage of donor nuclei. Porcine iPSC, derived here from the inner cell mass of blastocysts, have a prolonged S phase and are highly sensitive to drugs normally used for synchronization. However, a double-blocking procedure with 0.3 μM aphidicolin for 10 h followed by 20 ng/ml nocodazole for 4 h arrested 94.3% of the cells at G2/M and, after release from the block, provided 70.1% cells in the subsequent G1 phase without causing any significant loss of cell viability or pluripotent phenotype. Nuclei from different cell cycle stages were used as donors for NT to in vitro-matured metaphase II oocytes. G2/M nuclei were more efficient than either G1 and S stage nuclei in undergoing first cleavage and in producing blastocysts, but all groups had a high incidence of chromosomal/nuclear abnormalities at 2 h and 6 h compared with non-synchronized NT controls from fetal fibroblasts. Many G2 embryos extruded a pseudo-second polar body soon after NT and, at blastocyst, tended to be either polyploid or diploid. By contrast, the few G1 blastocysts that developed were usually mosaic or aneuploid. The poor developmental potential of G1 nuclei may relate to lack of a G1/S check point, as the cells become active in DNA synthesis shortly after exit from mitosis. Together, these data provide at least a partial explanation for the almost complete failure to produce cloned piglets from piPSC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G1 check point; cell cycle; induced pluripotent stem cell; nuclear transfer; porcine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24621508      PMCID: PMC4049963          DOI: 10.4161/cc.28176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  54 in total

1.  Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase.

Authors:  Klaus A Becker; Prachi N Ghule; Jaclyn A Therrien; Jane B Lian; Janet L Stein; Andre J van Wijnen; Gary S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  Early S phase DNA replication: a search for targets of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  David G Kaufman; Marila Cordeiro-Stone; Bruna P Brylawski; Stephanie M Cohen; Paul D Chastain
Journal:  Adv Enzyme Regul       Date:  2006-12-28

3.  Epigenetic memory of an active gene state depends on histone H3.3 incorporation into chromatin in the absence of transcription.

Authors:  Ray Kit Ng; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Centrosome inheritance after fertilization and nuclear transfer in mammals.

Authors:  Qing-Yuan Sun; Heide Schatten
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Prolonged interval between fusion and activation impairs embryonic development by inducing chromosome scattering and nuclear aneuploidy in pig somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jinyoung You; Kilyoung Song; Eunsong Lee
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Synchronization of the cell cycle using lovastatin.

Authors:  Sonia Javanmoghadam-Kamrani; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Aron M Geurts; Gregory J Cost; Yevgeniy Freyvert; Bryan Zeitler; Jeffrey C Miller; Vivian M Choi; Shirin S Jenkins; Adam Wood; Xiaoxia Cui; Xiangdong Meng; Anna Vincent; Stephen Lam; Mieczyslaw Michalkiewicz; Rebecca Schilling; Jamie Foeckler; Shawn Kalloway; Hartmut Weiler; Séverine Ménoret; Ignacio Anegon; Gregory D Davis; Lei Zhang; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Howard J Jacob; Roland Buelow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from Tibetan miniature pig.

Authors:  Miguel A Esteban; Jianyong Xu; Jiayin Yang; Meixiu Peng; Dajiang Qin; Wen Li; Zhuoxin Jiang; Jiekai Chen; Kang Deng; Mei Zhong; Jinglei Cai; Liangxue Lai; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system.

Authors:  Zhao Wu; Jijun Chen; Jiangtao Ren; Lei Bao; Jing Liao; Chun Cui; Linjun Rao; Hui Li; Yijun Gu; Huiming Dai; Hui Zhu; Xiaokun Teng; Lu Cheng; Lei Xiao
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.216

10.  Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells.

Authors:  Toshihiko Ezashi; Bhanu Prakash V L Telugu; Andrei P Alexenko; Shrikesh Sachdev; Sunilima Sinha; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Stirred Suspension Bioreactor Culture of Porcine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Kyle Burrell; Rkia Dardari; Taylor Goldsmith; Derek Toms; Daniel A F Villagomez; William Allan King; Mark Ungrin; Franklin D West; Ina Dobrinski
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 2.  Livestock models for exploiting the promise of pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  R Michael Roberts; Ye Yuan; Nicholas Genovese; Toshihiko Ezashi
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2015

3.  Barriers for Deriving Transgene-Free Pig iPS Cells with Episomal Vectors.

Authors:  Xuguang Du; Tao Feng; Dawei Yu; Yuanyuan Wu; Huiying Zou; Shuangyu Ma; Chong Feng; Yongye Huang; Hongsheng Ouyang; Xiaoxiang Hu; Dengke Pan; Ning Li; Sen Wu
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  An Improved System for Generation of Diploid Cloned Porcine Embryos Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Synchronized to Metaphase.

Authors:  Eunhye Kim; Zhong Zheng; Yubyeol Jeon; Yong-Xun Jin; Seon-Ung Hwang; Lian Cai; Chang-Kyu Lee; Nam-Hyung Kim; Sang-Hwan Hyun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Cell Cycle Regulators on the Cell Cycle Synchronization of Porcine induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Dae-Jin Kwon; In-Sul Hwang; Tae-Uk Kwak; Hyeon Yang; Mi-Ryung Park; Sun-A Ock; Keon Bong Oh; Jae-Seok Woo; Gi-Sun Im; Seongsoo Hwang
Journal:  Dev Reprod       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells as nuclear donors improve viability and health of cloned horses.

Authors:  R Olivera; L N Moro; R Jordan; N Pallarols; A Guglielminetti; C Luzzani; S G Miriuka; G Vichera
Journal:  Stem Cells Cloning       Date:  2018-02-14

7.  Effect of Aphidicolin, a Reversible Inhibitor of Eukaryotic Nuclear DNA Replication, on the Production of Genetically Modified Porcine Embryos by CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Sergio Navarro-Serna; Celia Piñeiro-Silva; Chiara Luongo; John Parrington; Raquel Romar; Joaquín Gadea
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Silencing of retrotransposon-derived imprinted gene RTL1 is the main cause for postimplantational failures in mammalian cloning.

Authors:  Dawei Yu; Jing Wang; Huiying Zou; Tao Feng; Lei Chen; Jia Li; Xiaolan Qi; Zhifang Li; Xiaoyue Duan; Chunlong Xu; Liang Zhang; Xi Long; Jing Lan; Chao Chen; Chao Wang; Xinyu Xu; Jilong Ren; Yiqiang Zhao; Xiaoxiang Hu; Zhengxing Lian; Hongsheng Men; Dengke Pan; Ning Li; Mario R Capecchi; Xuguang Du; Yaofeng Zhao; Sen Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Transcriptomic analysis of expression of genes regulating cell cycle progression in porcine ovarian granulosa cells during short-term in vitro primary culture.

Authors:  Magdalena Kulus; Wiesława Kranc; Patrycja Sujka-Kordowska; Piotr Celichowski; Aneta Konwerska; Maurycy Jankowski; Michal Jeseta; Mariusz T Skowroński; Hanna Piotrowska-Kempisty; Dorota Bukowska; Maciej Zabel; Małgorzata Bruska; Paul Mozdziak; Bartosz Kempisty; Paweł Antosik
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.304

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.