E J Gordon1, J Mullee, N Beauvais, E Warren, N Theodoropoulos, G McNatt, J Rassiwala, M G Ison. 1. Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transplant providers must understand the definition of increased risk donor (IRD) organs to effectively educate transplant candidates and obtain informed consent. This study surveyed non-physician providers from 20 transplant centers about their educational and informed consent practices of IRD kidneys. METHODS: An anonymous, web-based survey about the content and timing of education and informed consent for potential recipients of IRD kidneys, providers' knowledge of IRD kidneys, and provider and center characteristics was completed by most (67%; 90 of 135) of those invited to participate; 87 responses were included in analysis. RESULTS: Most (80%) reported understanding the concept of IRD kidneys. However, few reported sufficient knowledge of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network definition of IRDs, risk factors, screening tests, window periods, and infection transmission rates. Most (56%) felt uncomfortable with obtaining specific informed consent for IRD kidneys. Most respondents received informal education about IRD kidneys (78%), and recognized the need for (98%) and were interested in receiving (99%) further education on this topic. CONCLUSION: Non-physician transplant providers need and are interested in better education about IRD kidneys to effectively educate patients and obtain patients' informed consent.
INTRODUCTION: Transplant providers must understand the definition of increased risk donor (IRD) organs to effectively educate transplant candidates and obtain informed consent. This study surveyed non-physician providers from 20 transplant centers about their educational and informed consent practices of IRD kidneys. METHODS: An anonymous, web-based survey about the content and timing of education and informed consent for potential recipients of IRD kidneys, providers' knowledge of IRD kidneys, and provider and center characteristics was completed by most (67%; 90 of 135) of those invited to participate; 87 responses were included in analysis. RESULTS: Most (80%) reported understanding the concept of IRD kidneys. However, few reported sufficient knowledge of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network definition of IRDs, risk factors, screening tests, window periods, and infection transmission rates. Most (56%) felt uncomfortable with obtaining specific informed consent for IRD kidneys. Most respondents received informal education about IRD kidneys (78%), and recognized the need for (98%) and were interested in receiving (99%) further education on this topic. CONCLUSION: Non-physician transplant providers need and are interested in better education about IRD kidneys to effectively educate patients and obtain patients' informed consent.
Authors: Morgan L Cox; Michael S Mulvihill; Ashley Y Choi; Muath Bishawi; Asishana A Osho; John C Haney; Mani Daneshmand; Jacob A Klapper; Cameron R Wolfe; Matthew Hartwig Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Courtenay M Holscher; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Sommer E Gentry; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mary G Bowring; Courtenay M Holscher; Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Lauren M Kucirka; Sommer E Gentry; Dorry L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Christine M Durand; Mary G Bowring; Alvin G Thomas; Lauren M Kucirka; Allan B Massie; Andrew Cameron; Niraj M Desai; Mark Sulkowski; Dorry L Segev Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Yvonne M Kelly; Arya Zarinsefat; Mehdi Tavakol; Amy M Shui; Chiung-Yu Huang; John P Roberts Journal: BMC Med Ethics Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 2.652