Literature DB >> 24620972

Improved diagnostic value of a TCD-based non-invasive ICP measurement method compared with the sonographic ONSD method for detecting elevated intracranial pressure.

Arminas Ragauskas, Laimonas Bartusis, Ian Piper, Rolandas Zakelis, Vaidas Matijosaitis, Kestutis Petrikonis, Daiva Rastenyte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic reliability of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) ultrasonography with a transcranial Doppler (TCD)-based absolute intracranial pressure (ICP) value measurement method for detection of elevated ICP in neurological patients. The ONSD method has been only tested previously on neurosurgical patients.
METHODS: A prospective clinical study of a non-invasive ICP estimation method based on ONSD correlation with ICP and an absolute ICP value measurement method based on a two-depth TCD technology has recruited 108 neurological patients. Ninety-two of these patients have been enrolled in the final analysis of the diagnostic reliability of ONSD ultrasonography and 85 patients using the absolute ICP value measurement method. All non-invasive ICP measurements were compared with 'Gold Standard' invasive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure measurements obtained by lumbar puncture. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis has been used to investigate the diagnostic value of these two methods.
RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the ONSD method for detecting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP >14·7 mmHg) were calculated using a cutoff point of ONSD at 5·0 mm and found to be 37·0%, 58·5%, and 0·57, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the non-invasive absolute ICP measurement method were calculated at the same ICP cutoff point of 14·7 mmHg and were determined to be 68·0%, 84·3%, and 0·87, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive ICP measurement method based on two-depth TCD technology has a better diagnostic reliability on neurological patients than the ONSD method when expressed by the sensitivity and specificity for detecting elevated ICP >14·7 mmHg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute intracranial pressure,; Diagnostic reliability,; Doppler technology,; Non-invasive measurement,; Optic nerve sheath diameter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24620972     DOI: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  24 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Patrick Gerety; Tomas Aleman; Jordan Swanson; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Non-invasive detection of intracranial pressure related to the optic nerve.

Authors:  Jian Li; Chao Wan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

3.  Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure Status in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Using Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) MRI: A Prospective Patient Study with Contemporaneous CSF Pressure Correlation.

Authors:  A M Saindane; D Qiu; J N Oshinski; N J Newman; V Biousse; B B Bruce; J F Holbrook; B M Dale; X Zhong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Noninvasive assessment of cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Modelling of the dilated sagittal sinuses found in multiple sclerosis suggests increased wall stiffness may be a contributing factor.

Authors:  Grant Alexander Bateman; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Alexander Robert Bateman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Can intracranial pressure be measured non-invasively bedside using a two-depth Doppler-technique?

Authors:  Lars-Owe D Koskinen; Jan Malm; Rolandas Zakelis; Laimonas Bartusis; Arminas Ragauskas; Anders Eklund
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  The International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring: future directions and emerging technologies.

Authors:  Paul Vespa; David Menon; Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux; David K Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M Brophy; Michael N Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Böesel; Randall Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony Figaji; Jennifer Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter Hutchinson; Monisha Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; J Javier Provencio; Corinna Puppo; Richard Riker; Claudia Robertson; Michael Schmidt; Fabio Taccone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux; David K Menon; Giuseppe Citerio; Paul Vespa; Mary Kay Bader; Gretchen M Brophy; Michael N Diringer; Nino Stocchetti; Walter Videtta; Rocco Armonda; Neeraj Badjatia; Julian Böesel; Randall Chesnut; Sherry Chou; Jan Claassen; Marek Czosnyka; Michael De Georgia; Anthony Figaji; Jennifer Fugate; Raimund Helbok; David Horowitz; Peter Hutchinson; Monisha Kumar; Molly McNett; Chad Miller; Andrew Naidech; Mauro Oddo; DaiWai Olson; Kristine O'Phelan; J Javier Provencio; Corinna Puppo; Richard Riker; Claudia Robertson; Michael Schmidt; Fabio Taccone
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Christopher Hawthorne; Ian Piper
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.