Literature DB >> 24620851

Molecular dynamics simulations of sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles in water-the effect of the force field.

Xueming Tang1, Peter H Koenig, Ronald G Larson.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamic (MD) simulations of preassembled sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles are carried out using three versions of GROMOS, as well as CHARMM36, OPLS-AA, and OPLS-UA force fields at different aggregation numbers and box sizes. The differences among force fields have little effect on the overall micelle structure of small aggregates of size 60 or 100, but for micelles of an aggregation number of 300 or higher, bicelle structures with ordered tails, rather than the more realistic rodlike or cylindrical micelles with disordered tails, occur when using versions of GROMOS45A3 or the OPLS-AA force fields that are adapted to model the sulfate head group atoms using methods given in the literature. We find that the Lennard-Jones (L-J) parameters for the sodium ions and the ionic oxygens of the SDS head group, as well as the water model, control the transition to bicelles, regardless of other L-J parameters. A closer binding of the sodium ions to the head group ionic oxygens screens the electrostatic repulsions more strongly, resulting in condensation of SDS head groups, leading to unphysical bicelles for GROMOS45A3 or the OPLS-AA force fields, when the aggregation number is large. A telltale sign that the sodium-oxygen interaction is too strong shows up in high nearest neighbor peaks (height >8 and height >20 for micelles with 60 and 100 surfactants, respectively) in the radial distribution functions (RDFs) of sodium ions to ionic oxygens. In the 100-surfactant micelles, the high RDF peak is accompanied by "crystal-like" layering of sodium ions onto the surface of the micelle. The distance between the sodium ions and micelle also depends on the number of waters binding to sodium ions in the presence of surfactant head groups, which depends on both the sodium ion and water models, and for the same sodium model increases as the water model is changed in the order: TIP4P, SPC/E, SPC, and TIP3P.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24620851     DOI: 10.1021/jp410689m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  6 in total

1.  Modeling Protein-Micelle Systems in Implicit Water.

Authors:  Rodney E Versace; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  The role of natural processes and surface energy of inhaled engineered nanoparticles on aggregation and corona formation.

Authors:  Akira Tsuda; Nagarjun Konduru Venkata
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2016-06-11

3.  Modeling of the Binding of Peptide Blockers to Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels: Approaches and Evidence.

Authors:  V N Novoseletsky; A D Volyntseva; K V Shaitan; M P Kirpichnikov; A V Feofanov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  How the Choice of Force-Field Affects the Stability and Self-Assembly Process of Supramolecular CTA Fibers.

Authors:  Tomasz K Piskorz; A H de Vries; Jan H van Esch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Umbrella Sampling Simulations of Carbon Nanoparticles Crossing Immiscible Solvents.

Authors:  Anastasios Gotzias
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation-assisted Ionic Liquid Screening for Deep Coverage Proteome Analysis.

Authors:  Fei Fang; Qun Zhao; Huiying Chu; Mingwei Liu; Baofeng Zhao; Zhen Liang; Lihua Zhang; Guohui Li; Liming Wang; Jun Qin; Yukui Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.911

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.