| Literature DB >> 24620788 |
Eelco van Duinkerken1, Richard G Ijzerman, Nynke J van der Zijl, Frederik Barkhof, Petra J W Pouwels, Menno M Schoonheim, Annette C Moll, Jeannette Boerop, Alette M Wessels, Martin Klein, Frank J Snoek, Michaela Diamant.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with cerebral compromise, typically found in patients with microangiopathy. Associations between subclinical macroangiopathy and the brain, whether or not in the presence of microangiopathy, have not been fully explored in T1DM. We hypothesized that subclinical macroangiopathy in adult T1DM may affect the brain and interacts with microangiopathy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24620788 PMCID: PMC3995631 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-58
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Baseline characteristics
| N | 51 | 51 | 50 | - |
| Age (years) | 44.5 ± 7.1*# | 38.1 ± 9.3 | 36.7 ± 11.4 | <0.001 |
| Sex male/female | 21/30 | 20/33 | 20/31 | 0.978 |
| Estimated IQa | 110.2 ± 13.4 | 106.8 ± 11.3 | 108.5 ± 12.0 | 0.388 |
| Depressive symptomsb | 8.0 (0 – 42)*# | 5.0 (0 – 31) | 4.5 (0 – 37) | 0.008 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.6 ± 4.1 | 24.8 ± 3.6 | 24.1 ± 3.5 | 0.126 |
| Height (meters) | 1.73 ± 0.1 | 1.75 ± 0.1 | 1.76 ± 0.1 | 0.300 |
| Current smoker (%) | 6 (11.8) | 10 (19.6) | 11 (22.0) | 0.347 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 64.7 ± 14.1* | 61.7 ± 9.8* | 34.3 ± 2.6 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.1 ± 1.3* | 7.8 ± 0.9* | 5.3 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 0.276 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.8 ± 0.5* | 1.8 ± 0.5* | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 0.686 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 133.6 ± 17.3* | 129.0 ± 14.9 | 123.9 ± 11.4 | 0.005 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 76.0 ± 8.7 | 78.1 ± 9.7 | 77.1 ± 7.2 | 0.488 |
| Hypertension (%)c | 33 (64.7) | 12 (23.5) | - | <0.001 |
| ACR (mg/mmol) | 0.9 (0 – 33.2) | 0.4 (0 – 3.19) | - | 0.005 |
| Diabetes duration (years) | 34.3 ± 7.8 | 21.8 ± 9.4 | - | <0.001 |
| Diabetes onset age (years) | 10.2 ± 7.2 | 16.3 ± 9.7 | - | 0.001 |
| Early onset diabetes (%)d | 18 (35.3) | 10 (19.6) | | 0.120 |
| BG before echo (mmol/l) | 9.2 ± 4.0 | 8.9 ± 3.2 | - | 0.766 |
| Severe hypoglycemiae | 2.0 (0 – 40) | 2.0 (0 – 50) | - | 0.770 |
| Neuropathy (%)f | 25 (49) | - | - | - |
| Microalbuminuria (%)g | 14 (27.5) | - | - | - |
Data are represented as mean with standard deviation, median with min/max or absolute numbers with percentage between parenthesis. BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; ACR: albumin:creatinine ratio; BG: blood glucose.
*Statistically different from controls.
#Statistically different from patients without proliferative retinopathy.
aEstimated IQ was measured using the Dutch version of the National Adult Reading Test (NART).
bDepressive symptoms were self-reported using the Center for Epidemiological Studies scale for Depression (CES-D).
cHypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, a diastolic blood pressure of >90, or the use of antihypertensive drugs.
dEarly diabetes onset was defined as a onset before 7 years of age.
eSevere hypoglycaemic events were self-reported during lifetime according to DCCT guidelines.
fPeripheral neuropathy status was collected from the medical records, based on data from the annual check-up patients receive, or, if not available, was self-reported.
gMicroalbuminuria was defined as an albumin-to-creatinine ratio >2.5 mg/mmol for men and >3.5 mg/mmol for women.
Figure 1Bar chart of mean cIMT (panel A) and cD (panel B) values with standard deviation per group. T1DM: all type 1 diabetes patients; pDRP-: patients without proliferative retinopathy; pDRP+: patients with proliferative retinopathy; IMT: intima media thickness.
Figure 2Dot plots of relations between cIMT and general cognitive ability (panel A), information processing speed (panel B) and attention (panel C) in patients with (black triangles) and without (grey circles) proliferative retinopathy. Only associations in patients without proliferative retinopathy were statistically significant. After correction for multiple confounders the association between cIMT and attention in patient without proliferative retinopathy remained statistically significant.