OBJECTIVE: There is consistent evidence demonstrating that pet-keeping, particularly of dogs, is beneficial to human health. We explored relationships between maternal race and prenatal dog-keeping, accounting for measures of socioeconomic status that could affect the choice of owning a pet, in a demographically diverse, unselected birth cohort. DESIGN: Self-reported data on mothers' race, socioeconomic characteristics and dog-keeping practices were obtained during prenatal interviews and analyzed cross-sectionally. Robust methods of covariate balancing via propensity score analysis were utilized to examine if race (Black vs White), independent of other participant traits, influenced prenatal dog-keeping. SETTING: A birth cohort study conducted in a health care system in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan between September 2003 and November 2007. PARTICIPANTS: 1065 pregnant women (n=775 or 72.8% Black), between ages 21 and 45, receiving prenatal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant's self-report of race/ethnicity and prenatal dog-keeping, which was defined as her owning or caring for > or =1 dog for more than 1 week at her home since learning of her pregnancy, regardless of whether the dog was kept inside or outside of her home. RESULTS: In total, 294 women (27.6%) reported prenatal dog-keeping. Prenatal dog-keeping was significantly lower among Black women as compared to White women (20.9% vs 45.5%, P<.001), and remained significantly different even after propensity score analysis was applied. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that there are persistent racial differences in dog-keeping not fully explained by measures of socioeconomic status. Racial differences in prenatal dog-keeping may contribute to childhood health disparities.
OBJECTIVE: There is consistent evidence demonstrating that pet-keeping, particularly of dogs, is beneficial to human health. We explored relationships between maternal race and prenatal dog-keeping, accounting for measures of socioeconomic status that could affect the choice of owning a pet, in a demographically diverse, unselected birth cohort. DESIGN: Self-reported data on mothers' race, socioeconomic characteristics and dog-keeping practices were obtained during prenatal interviews and analyzed cross-sectionally. Robust methods of covariate balancing via propensity score analysis were utilized to examine if race (Black vs White), independent of other participant traits, influenced prenatal dog-keeping. SETTING: A birth cohort study conducted in a health care system in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan between September 2003 and November 2007. PARTICIPANTS: 1065 pregnant women (n=775 or 72.8% Black), between ages 21 and 45, receiving prenatal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant's self-report of race/ethnicity and prenatal dog-keeping, which was defined as her owning or caring for > or =1 dog for more than 1 week at her home since learning of her pregnancy, regardless of whether the dog was kept inside or outside of her home. RESULTS: In total, 294 women (27.6%) reported prenatal dog-keeping. Prenatal dog-keeping was significantly lower among Black women as compared to White women (20.9% vs 45.5%, P<.001), and remained significantly different even after propensity score analysis was applied. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that there are persistent racial differences in dog-keeping not fully explained by measures of socioeconomic status. Racial differences in prenatal dog-keeping may contribute to childhood health disparities.
Authors: Raina M Maier; Michael W Palmer; Gary L Andersen; Marilyn J Halonen; Karen C Josephson; Robert S Maier; Fernando D Martinez; Julia W Neilson; Debra A Stern; Donata Vercelli; Anne L Wright Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Markus J Ege; Melanie Mayer; Anne-Cécile Normand; Jon Genuneit; William O C M Cookson; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Dick Heederik; Renaud Piarroux; Erika von Mutius Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Charlotte Nicholas; Ganesa Wegienka; Suzanne Havstad; Edward Zoratti; Dennis Ownby; Christine Cole Johnson Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Marjan Kerkhof; Alet Wijga; Henriëtte A Smit; Johan C de Jongste; Rob C Aalberse; Bert Brunekreef; Jorrit Gerritsen; Dirkje S Postma Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: Kei E Fujimura; Christine C Johnson; Dennis R Ownby; Michael J Cox; Eoin L Brodie; Suzanne L Havstad; Edward M Zoratti; Kimberley J Woodcroft; Kevin R Bobbitt; Ganesa Wegienka; Homer A Boushey; Susan V Lynch Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow; Ganesa Wegienka; Suzanne Havstad; Albert M Levin; Susan V Lynch; Dennis R Ownby; Andrew G Rundle; Kimberley J Woodcroft; Edward M Zoratti; Christine Cole Johnson Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-06