Literature DB >> 24620400

Air pollutant emissions from the development, production, and processing of Marcellus Shale natural gas.

Anirban A Roy, Peter J Adams, Allen L Robinson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Marcellus Shale is one of the largest natural gas reserves in the United States; it has recently been the focus of intense drilling and leasing activity. This paper describes an air emissions inventory for the development, production, and processing of natural gas in the Marcellus Shale region for 2009 and 2020. It includes estimates of the emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and primary fine particulate matter (< or = 2.5 microm aerodynamic diameter; PM2.5) from major activities such as drilling, hydraulic fracturing, compressor stations, and completion venting. The inventory is constructed using a process-level approach; a Monte Carlo analysis is used to explicitly account for the uncertainty. Emissions were estimated for 2009 and projected to 2020, accounting for the effects of existing and potential additional regulations. In 2020, Marcellus activities are predicted to contribute 6-18% (95% confidence interval) of the NOx emissions in the Marcellus region, with an average contribution of 12% (129 tons/day). In 2020, the predicted contribution of Marcellus activities to the regional anthropogenic VOC emissions ranged between 7% and 28% (95% confidence interval), with an average contribution of 12% (100 tons/day). These estimates account for the implementation of recently promulgated regulations such as the Tier 4 off-road diesel engine regulation and the US. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Oil and Gas Rule. These regulations significantly reduce the Marcellus VOC and NOx emissions, but there are significant opportunities for further reduction in these emissions using existing technologies. IMPLICATIONS: The Marcellus Shale is one of the largest natural gas reserves in United States. The development and production of this gas may emit substantial amounts of oxides of nitrogen and volatile organic compounds. These emissions may have special significance because Marcellus development is occurring close to areas that have been designated nonattainment for the ozone standard. Control technologies exist to substantially reduce these impacts. PM2.5 emissions are predicted to be negligible in a regional context, but elemental carbon emissions from diesel powered equipment may be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24620400     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.826151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  22 in total

1.  Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; David A Savitz; Sara G Rasmussen; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Jonathan Pollak; Dione G Mercer; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Public Participation in Air Sampling and Water Quality Test Kit Development to Enable Citizen Science.

Authors:  Erin N Haynes; Timothy J Hilbert; Rusty Roberts; John Quirolgico; Rachael Shepler; Gerry Beckner; Jennifer Veevers; Jeff Burkle; Roman Jandarov
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

Review 4.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Extraction into Air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Impact of natural gas extraction on PAH levels in ambient air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Association Between Unconventional Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale and Asthma Exacerbations.

Authors:  Sara G Rasmussen; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Meredith McCormack; Joan A Casey; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Dione G Mercer; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Exposure Assessment Using Secondary Data Sources in Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Health Studies.

Authors:  Kirsten Koehler; J Hugh Ellis; Joan A Casey; David Manthos; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Rutherford Platt; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.