PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between docetaxel and atrasentan as part of a phase I/II clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer were treated with intravenous docetaxel (60-75 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks and oral atrasentan (10 mg) daily starting on day 3 of cycle 1 and then given continuously. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs were evaluated individually (cycle 1, day 1 for docetaxel; day 21 for atrasentan) and in combination (cycle 2, day 1 for both drugs). Pharmacogenomics of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) were also explored. RESULTS: Paired pharmacokinetic data sets for both drugs were evaluable in 21 patients. Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed and plasma concentrations varied over a fourfold range at steady state within a typical patient. The median apparent oral clearance of atrasentan was 17.4 L/h in cycle 1 and was not affected by docetaxel administration (p = 0.9). Median systemic clearance of docetaxel was 51.1 L/h on the first cycle and significantly slower (p = 0.01) compared with that obtained during co-administration of atrasentan, 61.6 L/h. Docetaxel systemic clearance in cycle 1 was 70.0 L/h in patients homozygous for a variant allele in AAG compared with 44.5 L/h in those with at least one wild-type allele (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Genetic polymorphism in AAG may explain some inter-patient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics. The systemic clearance of docetaxel is increased by approximately 21 % when given concomitantly with atrasentan; however, atrasentan pharmacokinetics does not appear to be influenced by docetaxel administration.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between docetaxel and atrasentan as part of a phase I/II clinical trial. METHODS:Patients with prostate cancer were treated with intravenous docetaxel (60-75 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks and oral atrasentan (10 mg) daily starting on day 3 of cycle 1 and then given continuously. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs were evaluated individually (cycle 1, day 1 for docetaxel; day 21 for atrasentan) and in combination (cycle 2, day 1 for both drugs). Pharmacogenomics of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) were also explored. RESULTS: Paired pharmacokinetic data sets for both drugs were evaluable in 21 patients. Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed and plasma concentrations varied over a fourfold range at steady state within a typical patient. The median apparent oral clearance of atrasentan was 17.4 L/h in cycle 1 and was not affected by docetaxel administration (p = 0.9). Median systemic clearance of docetaxel was 51.1 L/h on the first cycle and significantly slower (p = 0.01) compared with that obtained during co-administration of atrasentan, 61.6 L/h. Docetaxel systemic clearance in cycle 1 was 70.0 L/h in patients homozygous for a variant allele in AAG compared with 44.5 L/h in those with at least one wild-type allele (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Genetic polymorphism in AAG may explain some inter-patient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics. The systemic clearance of docetaxel is increased by approximately 21 % when given concomitantly with atrasentan; however, atrasentan pharmacokinetics does not appear to be influenced by docetaxel administration.
Authors: Jin Heng Li; Jing Qiu Xu; Xiao Mei Cao; Li Ni; Yong Li; Yi Yi Zhuang; Jian Bin Gong Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: M C Verhaar; A Y Grahn; A W Van Weerdt; M L Honing; P J Morrison; Y P Yang; R J Padley; T J Rabelink Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Christopher W Ryan; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Everett E Vokes; Hedy L Kindler; Samir D Undevia; Rod Humerickhouse; Amy K André; Qiang Wang; Robert A Carr; Mark J Ratain Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Srikanth C Nallani; Bryan Goodwin; Arthur R Buckley; Donna J Buckley; Pankaj B Desai Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: René Bruno; Robert Olivares; Jocelyne Berille; Philip Chaikin; Nicole Vivier; Luz Hammershaimb; Gerald R Rhodes; James R Rigas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nieves González; Isabel Prieto; Laura Del Puerto-Nevado; Sergio Portal-Nuñez; Juan Antonio Ardura; Marta Corton; Beatriz Fernández-Fernández; Oscar Aguilera; Carmen Gomez-Guerrero; Sebastián Mas; Juan Antonio Moreno; Marta Ruiz-Ortega; Ana Belen Sanz; Maria Dolores Sanchez-Niño; Federico Rojo; Fernando Vivanco; Pedro Esbrit; Carmen Ayuso; Gloria Alvarez-Llamas; Jesús Egido; Jesús García-Foncillas; Alberto Ortiz Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-03-14
Authors: Reka Varnai; Leena M Koskinen; Laura E Mäntylä; Istvan Szabo; Liesel M FitzGerald; Csilla Sipeky Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Natália Bertoni; Lied M S Pereira; Fábio E Severino; Regina Moura; Winston B Yoshida; Patricia P Reis Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 2.103