Literature DB >> 24619208

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast tumors at 3 and 7 T: a comparison.

Stephan Gruber1, Katja Pinker, Olgica Zaric, Lenka Minarikova, Marek Chmelik, Pascal Baltzer, Roland N Boubela, Thomas Helbich, Wolfgang Bogner, Siegfried Trattnig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the image quality, contrast enhancement behavior, and diagnostic value of bilateral 3-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with high spatial and temporal resolution, at 3 and 7 T, in the same patient group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 57 [17] years) were included in this prospective institutional review board-approved study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. T1-weighted 3-dimensional sequences (time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories) were optimized at 3 and 7 T, with high temporal (both 14 seconds) and spatial resolution (1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1 mm [3 T], 0.7 × 0.7 × 0.7 mm [7 T]): echo time/repetition time, 2.84/6.01 milliseconds (3 T) and 2.5/4.75 milliseconds (7 T); acquisition time, 9 minutes (3 T/7 T). Dotarem (gadoterate meglumine, Guerbet, Roissy CdG, France) contrast agent was injected intravenously as a bolus (0.2 mL/kg of body weight) after 3 baseline images. The images were rated according to breast imaging-reporting and data system by 2 radiologists in consensus. Signal-to-noise ratio and average enhancement ratios were measured quantitatively by means of region of interest analysis. In addition, B1 mapping was done in the same 5 healthy subjects at both field strengths.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight enhancing lesions were detected in the 24 patients at both field strengths (16 malignant, 12 benign). At 7 T, higher contrast than that at 3 T and good image quality were achieved. With the high spatial isotropic resolution of 0.7 mm at 7 T, images with more detailed information could be acquired when compared with those acquired at 3 T. Sensitivity was 93.75% and 100%, at 3 and 7 T, respectively. Specificity was 91.67% at both field strengths. The signal-to-noise ratio at both field strengths was comparable, but at 7 T, the spatial resolution was 3.2-times higher than that at 3 T. A signal-to-noise ratio decrease toward prepectoral breast regions due to B1 inhomogeneities was observed at both field strengths but was stronger at 7 T (51%) than at 3 T (19%)(P = 0.0002). At 7 T, B1+ dropped by 20.7% and 32.8% in the prepectoral and lateral region of the breast in healthy subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Our comparison study shows that 7-T DCE-MRI provides simultaneous high temporal and spatial resolution that is significantly improved compared with lower field strengths, but further technical improvements are necessary to overcome B1 inhomogeneity problems at 7 T to fully unfold the potential of breast MRI at 7 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24619208     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  12 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Toward 7T breast MRI clinical study: safety assessment using simulation of heterogeneous breast models in RF exposure.

Authors:  Xin Li; Joseph V Rispoli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Radiofrequency transmit calibration: A multi-center evaluation of vendor-provided radiofrequency transmit mapping methods.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; Xinran Zhong; Yi Guo; Michael Boss; Ryan Bosca; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Kyunghyun Sung; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A dual-tuned multichannel bilateral RF coil for 1 H/23 Na breast MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Carlotta Ianniello; Guillaume Madelin; Linda Moy; Ryan Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  [Multiparametric and molecular imaging of breast tumors with MRI and PET/MRI].

Authors:  K Pinker; M A Marino; A Dr Meyer-Baese; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7T and 3T: an intra-individual comparison study.

Authors:  Gisela L G Menezes; Bertine L Stehouwer; Dennis W J Klomp; Tijl A van der Velden; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Floortje M Knuttel; Vincent O Boer; Wybe J M van der Kemp; Peter R Luijten; Wouter B Veldhuis
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 8.  The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Development of a 7 T RF coil system for breast imaging.

Authors:  Junghwan Kim; Tales Santini; Kyongtae Ty Bae; Narayan Krishnamurthy; Yujuan Zhao; Tiejun Zhao; Tamer S Ibrahim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Investigating the prediction value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lenka Minarikova; Wolfgang Bogner; Katja Pinker; Ladislav Valkovič; Olgica Zaric; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Rupert Bartsch; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig; Stephan Gruber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.