S Beck1, C Büchi, P Lauber, D Grob, C Meier. 1. Klinik für Akutgeriatrie, Zentrum für Gerontotraumatologie, Stadtspital Waid, Tièchestr. 99, 8037, Zürich, Schweiz, sacha.beck@waid.zuerich.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Older patients more often suffer perioperative complications than younger people. Especially geriatric patients who require emergency treatment represent a high-risk group. Therefore, perioperative risk assessment supports the treatment team in identifying patients at risk and in defining the treatment plan accordingly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough medical history and clinical examination are pivotal elements of any risk stratification. The organ-specific risk assessment is primarily used to plan the surgical and anesthesiological procedures. RESULTS: For a comprehensive risk assessment in geriatric patients, the organ-specific risk stratification is insufficient. Assessment instruments that reflect the idiosyncrasies of multidimensional disease in geriatric patients can complement risk stratification. These should include the assessment of multimorbidity, frailty, nutrition, activities of daily living, and cognition. In addition to risk prediction, geriatric assessment has the major advantage of providing both a diagnostic and a planning perspective. This allows the implementation of supporting measures for optimal perioperative care, which is the goal of any risk stratification. Risk scores provide a global assessment, but they have their limitations in predicting individual patient risk.
BACKGROUND: Older patients more often suffer perioperative complications than younger people. Especially geriatric patients who require emergency treatment represent a high-risk group. Therefore, perioperative risk assessment supports the treatment team in identifying patients at risk and in defining the treatment plan accordingly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough medical history and clinical examination are pivotal elements of any risk stratification. The organ-specific risk assessment is primarily used to plan the surgical and anesthesiological procedures. RESULTS: For a comprehensive risk assessment in geriatric patients, the organ-specific risk stratification is insufficient. Assessment instruments that reflect the idiosyncrasies of multidimensional disease in geriatric patients can complement risk stratification. These should include the assessment of multimorbidity, frailty, nutrition, activities of daily living, and cognition. In addition to risk prediction, geriatric assessment has the major advantage of providing both a diagnostic and a planning perspective. This allows the implementation of supporting measures for optimal perioperative care, which is the goal of any risk stratification. Risk scores provide a global assessment, but they have their limitations in predicting individual patient risk.
Authors: Kim A Eagle; Peter B Berger; Hugh Calkins; Bernard R Chaitman; Gordon A Ewy; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Lee A Fleisher; James B Froehlich; Richard J Gusberg; Jeffrey A Leppo; Thomas Ryan; Robert C Schlant; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Loren F Hiratzka; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stefan Stortecky; Andreas W Schoenenberger; André Moser; Bindu Kalesan; Peter Jüni; Thierry Carrel; Seraina Bischoff; Christa-Maria Schoenenberger; Andreas E Stuck; Stephan Windecker; Peter Wenaweser Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Lee A Fleisher; Joshua A Beckman; Kenneth A Brown; Hugh Calkins; Elliot L Chaikof; Elliott Chaikof; Kirsten E Fleischmann; William K Freeman; James B Froehlich; Edward K Kasper; Judy R Kersten; Barbara Riegel; John F Robb; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-10-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: David C Evans; Charles H Cook; Jonathan M Christy; Claire V Murphy; Anthony T Gerlach; Daniel Eiferman; David E Lindsey; Melissa L Whitmill; Thomas J Papadimos; Paul R Beery; Steven M Steinberg; Stanislaw P A Stawicki Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper; Michael Heung; Andrew L Rosenberg; Michael Englesbe; Amy M Shanks; Darrell A Campbell Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Joan D Penrod; Ann Litke; William G Hawkes; Jay Magaziner; Kenneth J Koval; John T Doucette; Stacey B Silberzweig; Albert L Siu Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: F Vogt; S Wicklein; K Singler; S Pfeiffer; T Fischlein; J Schwab; M Pauschinger; J Jessl Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Nick Spindler; Philipp Pieroh; Ulrich Spiegl; Sergey Arakelyan; Johannes Karl Maria Fakler; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Stefan Langer Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Jordan Willis; Casey E Pelzl; Stephanie Jarvis; Gina Berg; Chad Corrigan; Robert Madayag; Cassandra Reynolds; Allen Tanner; Gary Marshall; Mark Lieser; David Bar-Or Journal: OTA Int Date: 2022-01-03