Literature DB >> 24618962

Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.

Drummond Rennie1, Annette Flanagin2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24618962     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Deborah Levine; Patrick M Bossuyt; Herbert Y Kressel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  How to make more published research true.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices.

Authors:  Luke C Carey; Serina Stretton; Charlotte A Kenreigh; Linda T Wagner; Karen L Woolley
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.

Authors:  Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 5.  Adherence to participant flow diagrams in trials on postoperative pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a methodological review.

Authors:  Thea Nørgaard Rønsbo; Jens Laigaard; Casper Pedersen; Ole Mathiesen; Anders Peder Højer Karlsen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Sharing Neuron Data: Carrots, Sticks, and Digital Records.

Authors:  Giorgio A Ascoli
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.