Literature DB >> 24618329

Health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery--the effects of age, preoperative conditions and postoperative complications.

Vojtěch Kurfirst1, Aleš Mokráček, Martina Krupauerová, Júlia Canádyová, Alan Bulava, Ladislav Pešl, Věra Adámková.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing the postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after cardiac surgery have not been well described yet, mainly in the older people. The study's aim was to explore differences in clinical conditions and HRQOL of patients before and after cardiac surgery taking into account the influence of age and to describe factors influencing changes of HRQOL in the postoperative period.
METHODS: This was a prospective consecutive observational study with two measurements using the SF-36 questionnaire before surgery and 1 year after surgery. It considered main clinical characteristics of participants prior to surgery as well as postoperative complications.
RESULTS: At baseline assessment the study considered 310 patients, predominantly male (69%). Mean age was 65 (SD 10.4) years and 101 patients (33%), who were older than 70, constituted the older group. This older group showed greater comorbidity, higher cardiac operative risk and lower HRQOL in the preoperative period as well as a higher prevalence of postoperative complications than the younger group. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% in the younger group and 6.9% in the older group (p < 0.001). One year mortality was 3.3% in the younger group and 10.9% in the older group (p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in all 8 health domains of the SF-36 questionnaire (p < 0.001) in the overall sample. There was no significant difference in change in a majority of HRQOL domains between the younger and the older group (p > 0.05). Logistic multivariate analysis identified a higher values of preoperative PCS (Physical component summary) scores (OR 1.03, CI 1.00 - 1.05, p = 0.0187) and MCS (Mental component summary) scores (OR 1.02, CI 0.997 - 1.00, p = 0.0846) as the only risk factors for potential non-improvement of HRQOL after cardiac surgery after correction for age, gender and type of surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with higher operative risk have lower preoperative HRQOL but show a similar improvement in a majority of HRQOL domains after cardiac surgery as compared with younger patients. The multivariate analysis has shown the higher preoperative HRQOL status as a only significant factor of potential non-improvement of postoperative HRQOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24618329      PMCID: PMC3995816          DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an increasingly important aspect in assessing the outcome of any surgical intervention [1]. Simultaneously life expectancy has increased, particularly in recent decades, thus leading to an increase in the numbers of an aging population undergoing cardiac surgery [2]. Age is an independent factor in calculating the risk of death during cardiac surgery [3,4]. Because older patients usually suffer from comorbidities which can make the course of an operation significantly longer [5], and also because they have lower functional reserves [6], there is a higher prevalence of postoperative complications or death. Studies concerning the influence of age on postoperative HRQOL have produced differing conclusions. While some have presented better postoperative HRQOL outcomes for younger patients [7], others have found the opposite [8]. The influence of age on HRQOL has not yet been definitively demonstrated. In the postoperative period, the most frequent complications has been described as supraventricular arrhythmia, infection, cognitive impairment, as well as respiratory and renal insufficiency [9]. Older patients are also given more units of red blood cell transfusion, which corresponds to a higher incidence of preoperative anemia, smaller capacity of the hematopoietic system, and a lower tolerance of postoperative hypohemoglobinaemia [10]. Providing a greater number of red cell units has been identified as an independent factor in postoperative mortality [11]. Although these complications have been well described, there is still not enough information about the impact of postoperative complications on HRQOL. The SF-36 questionnaire is often used as a tool for assessing the quality of life in various medical fields, where it is valued especially for its ability to capture the social dimensions of life [12]. In cardiology, for example, it has been used in patients with ischaemic heart disease [13], in the course of heart failure [14], or in the presence of atrial fibrillation [15]. In cardiac surgery, an assessment of HRQOL by means of the SF-36 questionnaire has been used in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization [16], after surgery on heart valves [17,18] or the thoracic aorta [19], and after interventions for cardiac arrhythmias [20]. It also has proven effective in patients after valve replacement with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis which when closing produces a clicking sound [21]. The aim of this study was to assess the HRQOL of two groups of patients (age ≤70 and >70 years) by using the SF-36 questionnaire and to compare clinical data from the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods experienced by these groups. A second aim was to identify a group of patients who do not benefit from the surgery (non-improvers) and to find potential risk factors for unimproved quality of life after cardiac surgery.

Methods

The study was carried out with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Hospital of České Budějovice. In the period from January 2008 to June 2009, 873 patients were operated on in the Cardiac Surgery Department of Hospital České Budějovice. All patients included in this study were operated on by a single surgeon, and the total number of patients was 310. All procedures were performed in a standard manner using extracorporeal circulation and during heart arrest. No off-pump procedures were used in the study population. The grafts used during revascularization procedures were LIMA (left internal mammary artery) and vein grafts. The inclusion criteria were: elective cardiac surgery, agreement with participation in the study, and written informed consent. Patients undergoing urgent cardiac surgery and patients who refused to participate in the study were excluded. SF-36 questionnaires were completed before surgery and 1 year after discharge from the hospital. All patients participating in the study had agreed to do so, and written informed consent was obtained. The SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate HRQOL of patients included in this study. Evaluation of HRQOL using the SF-36 is based on 8 domains covering the physical, mental, and social life of the individual. These domains are as follow: Physical functioning, Role physical, Role emotional, Social functioning, Bodily pain, Mental health, Vitality and General health. Questions are related to the period 4 weeks before completion of the questionnaire, and therefore the evaluation is not influenced by transitory changes in status. Answers are then converted to 0-100 scale for each health domain where higher values indicate better health status. A standardized procedure is used for interpreting responses given to the SF-36 questionnaire [22,23]. Clinical data from the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative period were collected from medical records. All clinical variables and events were defined according to standard European Society of Cardiology definitions. The differences between the preoperative and postoperative HRQOL were assessed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. The total number of patients was divided into two groups (age ≤70 and >70 years) and an HRQOL assessment was performed 1 year after surgery, after which we analyzed and compared the two groups of patients. We also compared HRQOL between survivors and non-survivors. The differences between subgroups were compared by unpaired t-test and χ2 test. For all subgroups, p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to examine the association between preoperative variables (preoperative PCS and MCS, age, gender, type of surgery) and postoperative HRQOL improvement. Improvement was defined as a positive increase in postoperative SF-36 subscales. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were used for the multivariate analysis. The PCS and MCS scores are two meta-scores of the SF-36 calculated from the SF-36 questionnaire and reflect a patient’s overall physical and mental health status. PCS is consisted of these domains of SF-36 questionnaire: Physical functioning, Role physical, Bodily pain, Vitality and General health. MCS is consisted of these domains: Role emotional, Social functioning and Mental health. These summary scales were used in this study as the primary health-related HRQOL variable for the multivariate analysis. Non-improvers were defined as patients with difference ≤ 0 between preoperative and postoperative quality of life in both PCS and MCS scores. Improvers were defined as patients with difference > 0 between preoperative and postoperative quality of life in PCS or MCS or both scores. Patients’ risk scores were obtained via the EuroSCORE calculator, which is free accessible at the web site http://www.euroscore.org. The mortality data were obtained via the registry of the Czech Society of Cardiovascular Surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA 10 [24] and XLSTAT version 2011 [25].

Results

Preoperative characteristics of the 310 patients are summarized in Table 1. Men accounted for 69% of the patients, and the mean age was 65 ± 10.4 years. In the preoperative period, the older group showed a higher prevalence of hypertension (p = 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.026), atrial arrhythmia (p < 0.001), renal dysfunction (p = 0.008), cerebrovascular disease (p = 0.045), and anemia (p = 0.027). Their collective EuroSCORE was also higher (p < 0.001). There were no statistical differences in the durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp, or anesthesia times between the two groups of patients (Table 2).
Table 1

Preoperative clinical characteristics of all patients

 
Age ≤70 years
Age >70 years
p
VariablesNo.Mean%No.Mean% 
Total
209
 
67.4
101
 
32.6
 
Male
156
 
74.6
56
 
55.4
0.001
Age (years)
 
59.9
 
 
75.4
 
<0.001
Reoperation
11
 
5.3
4
 
4.0
0.617
Prior PCI
35
 
16.7
11
 
10.9
0.174
History of MI
31
 
14.8
12
 
12.9
0.771
Hypertension
126
 
60.3
80
 
79.2
0.001
Diabetes mellitus
53
 
25.4
38
 
37.6
0.026
Supraventricular arrhythmia
26
 
12.4
33
 
32.7
<0.001
COPD
27
 
12.9
8
 
7.9
0.192
Renal dysfunction
25
 
12.0
24
 
23.8
0.008
Cerebral vascular disease
15
 
7.2
14
 
13.9
0.058
History of CVA
10
 
4.8
11
 
10.9
0.045
PAD
8
 
3.8
4
 
4.0
0.100
Anemia
9
 
4.3
11
 
10.9
0.027
EuroSCORE
 
4.3
 
 
10.5
 
<0.001
LVEF (%)
 
59.6
 
 
60.9
 
0.372
Age of patients not included in the QoL assessment
 
61.1
 
 
76.3
 
<0.001
EuroSCORE of patients not included in the QoL assessment 3.8  11.2 <0.001

No. – number, Reoperation – previous cardiac operation, PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, MI – myocardial infarction, Diabetes mellitus – treated by subcutaneous insulin or by oral antidiabetics, Supraventricular arrhythmia – atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Renal dysfunction – serum creatinine ≥ 120 umol/l, Cerebral vascular disease – stenosis of carotid artery >70%, CVA – cerebrovascular accident, PAD – peripheral artery disease, Anemia – serum hemoglobin < 12 g/dL (women) or < 13 g/dL (men), LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction.

Table 2

Perioperative clinical characteristics of the studied patients

Variables
Age ≤70 years
Age >70 years
p
 No.Mean%SDNo.Mean%SD 
Coronary artery bypass grafting
73
 
34.9
 
39
 
38.6
 
<0.001
Valve procedures
75
 
35.9
 
25
 
24.8
 
<0.001
Combined procedures
61
 
29.2
 
37
 
36.6
 
0.038
Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min)
 
87.2
 
41.5
 
88.4
 
30.1
0.795
Aortic cross-clamp time (min)
 
62.0
 
35.9
 
59.3
 
22.4
0.495
Anesthesia time (min) 255.2 55.4 259.7 51.90.505
Preoperative clinical characteristics of all patients No. – number, Reoperation – previous cardiac operation, PCI – percutaneous coronary intervention, MI – myocardial infarction, Diabetes mellitus – treated by subcutaneous insulin or by oral antidiabetics, Supraventricular arrhythmiaatrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Renal dysfunction – serum creatinine ≥ 120 umol/l, Cerebral vascular disease – stenosis of carotid artery >70%, CVA – cerebrovascular accident, PAD – peripheral artery disease, Anemia – serum hemoglobin < 12 g/dL (women) or < 13 g/dL (men), LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction. Perioperative clinical characteristics of the studied patients In the postoperative period, the prevalences of cerebrovascular events (p = 0.001), renal failure (p = 0.018), infection (p = 0.005), and cognitive impairment (p = 0.006) were also higher in the older group (Table 3). The number of packed red blood cell units given in the postoperative period was higher in the older group (p = 0.012). Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% (3 patients) in the younger group and 6.9% (7 patients) in the older group (p < 0.001). One year mortality was 3.3% (7 patients) in the younger group and 10.9% (11 patients) in the older group (p < 0.001). The median length of ICU/hospital stay was 2/7 days in the younger group and 2/8 days in the older group.
Table 3

Postoperative complications and additionally assessed variables

 
Age ≤70 years
Age >70 years
p
VariablesNo.Mean%No.Mean% 
Inotropic drug support required
81
 
38.9
44
 
43.4
0.446
MI
4
 
1.9
1
 
1.0
0.543
CVA
10
 
0.5
7
 
6.9
0.001
Supraventricular arrhythmia
88
 
42.1
51
 
50.5
0.164
Ventricular arrhythmia
7
 
3.3
2
 
2.0
0.502
Renal failure
7
 
3.3
10
 
9.9
0.018
Infection
21
 
10.0
22
 
21.8
0.005
Reexploration for bleeding
7
 
3.3
3
 
3.0
0.862
Cognitive impairment
17
 
8.1
19
 
18.8
0.006
Ventilation problems
10
 
4.8
8
 
7.9
0.269
Sternal wound infection
8
 
3.8
4
 
4.0
1.000
Packed red blood cells (units)
 
2.1
 
 
3.1
 
0.012
Platelets (units)
 
0.3
 
 
0.2
 
0.731
Fresh frozen plasma (units)
 
1.6
 
 
2.4
 
0.090
Median ICU stay time (days)
2 (1 – 27)
 
 
2 (1 – 32)
 
 
0.095
Median hospital stay time (days)7 (4 – 41)  8 (4 – 44)  0.661

MI – myocardial infarction, CVA – cerebrovascular accident, Supraventricular arrhythmia – atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, Ventricular arrhythmia – ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, Renal failure – increase of serum creatinine > 80 mmol/l with or without need for temporary dialysis, Infection – infection of respiratory or urinary system, Cognitive impairment – psychomotor agitation with the necessity of therapeutic intervention, Ventilation problems – symptoms of partial and/or global respiratory failure with or without need for reintubation, ICU – intensive care unit.

Postoperative complications and additionally assessed variables MI – myocardial infarction, CVA – cerebrovascular accident, Supraventricular arrhythmiaatrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, Ventricular arrhythmia – ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, Renal failure – increase of serum creatinine > 80 mmol/l with or without need for temporary dialysis, Infectioninfection of respiratory or urinary system, Cognitive impairment – psychomotor agitation with the necessity of therapeutic intervention, Ventilation problems – symptoms of partial and/or global respiratory failure with or without need for reintubation, ICU – intensive care unit. Completed SF-36 questionnaires 1 year after surgery were obtained from 260 patients (84%) and used for the statistical assessment. Incomplete SF-36 questionnaires from 19 patients as well as unreturned questionnaires from another 31 patients (18 patients died in the study period, 13 patients did not return the questionnaire) were not considered in the statistical assessment. The characteristics of the patients returning incomplete SF-36 questionnaires or not returning the questionnaire are given in Table 1. The results of changes in preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores are presented in Table 4. Postoperative SF-36 scores of the study group significantly improved in all 8 health domains: Physical functioning, Role physical, Bodily pain, General health, Vitality, Social functioning, Role emotional, and Mental health. Next, patients were divided into two groups according to their age (age ≤70 years and >70 years). The preoperative SF-36 scores for HRQOL were relatively higher for the younger group (Table 5), and we found relatively greater differences between preoperative and postoperative HRQOL domains in the group age >70 years. The only statistically significant difference between the younger and the older groups, however, was in the perception of bodily pain domain(p = 0.03), which improved more in the older group of patients. Comparison of postoperative SF-36 results between these two groups is presented in Table 6.
Table 4

SF-36 scores of the study population before and one year after cardiac surgery

 
Before surgery
One year after surgery
p
 
n = 260
n = 260
 
Sub-scoreMeanSDMeanSD 
PF
48.2
28.1
65.5
24.1
<0.001
RP
28.8
37.3
51.1
38.8
<0.001
BP
59.1
25.9
73.9
23.4
<0.001
GH
46.9
17.2
51.8
17.9
<0.001
VT
48.3
19.9
57.4
18.9
<0.001
SF
66.1
22.1
73.6
22.7
<0.001
RE
42.6
42.3
67.9
35.3
<0.001
MH59.720.370.616.5<0.001

PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health.

Table 5

SF-36 scores of patient groups age ≤70 and >70 years before cardiac surgery

 
Age ≤70 years
Age >70 years
p
 
n = 179
n = 81
 
Sub-scoreMeanSDMeanSD 
PF
54.2
28.1
35.1
25.4
<0.001
RP
34.2
39.3
16.7
29.6
<0.001
BP
62.7
26.6
51.3
22.8
<0.001
GH
48.6
17.8
43.1
15.4
<0.001
VT
50.6
21.0
43.1
16.5
<0.001
SF
68.3
22.4
61.3
21.0
<0.001
RE
48.2
43.3
30.0
37.1
<0.001
MH62.320.454.919.4<0.001

PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health.

Table 6

Differences in SF-36 scores before and 1 year after cardiac surgery between patient groups age ≤70 years and >70 years

 
Age ≤70 years
Age >70 years
p
 
n = 179
n = 81
 
Sub-scoreDifferenceSDDifferenceSD 
PF
15.4
29.2
21.2
27.4
0.13
RP
20.7
47.6
25.9
48.8
0.41
BP
11.9
31.4
21.2
32.7
0.03
GH
4.2
22.1
6.4
17.6
0.43
VT
8.4
23.5
10.8
22.1
0.43
SF
6.2
27.3
10.2
26.3
0.27
RE
22.9
50.3
30.9
47.7
0.23
MH9.721.713.721.70.17

PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health.

SF-36 scores of the study population before and one year after cardiac surgery PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health. SF-36 scores of patient groups age ≤70 and >70 years before cardiac surgery PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health. Differences in SF-36 scores before and 1 year after cardiac surgery between patient groups age ≤70 years and >70 years PF – physical functioning, RP – role physical, BP – bodily pain, GH – general health, VT – vitality, SF – social functioning, RE – role emotional, MH – mental health. When comparing the subgroups of survivors and non-survivors, we found significant differences in all 8 HRQOL domains of the preoperative SF-36 questionnaire (Figure 1). There were 16% of non-improvers, 10% of patients improved only in PCS scores, 9.5% of patients improved only in MCS scores and 64% of patients in our group improved in both PCS and MCS scores of HRQOL. The characteristics of improvers and non-improvers are listed in Table 7. The results from multivariate analysis demonstrate that among the preoperative variables only preoperative HRQOL status was a significant factor associated with potential non-improvement in postoperative quality of life (Table 8). The highest risk of non-improvement was found in those patients having higher preoperative PCS and MCS scores.
Figure 1

SF-36 differences in preoperative HRQOL between survivors and non-survivors.

Table 7

Characteristics of improvers and non-improvers group

 
Improvers
Non-improvers
 
 
n = 218
n = 42
 
VariablesMeanSDMeanSDp-value
Ejection fraction (%)
61.0
11.4
61.2
11.5
0.93
Age
65.6
9.5
63.3
10.0
0.17
BMI
29.3
4.6
30.0
5.2
0.4
ICU stay time (days)
3.2
2.8
3.3
1.9
0.75
Hospital stay time (days)
9.1
5.4
11.5
8.8
0.09
Preoperative PCS
40.9
23.6
66.5
23.7
<0.001
Postoperative PCS
66.5
23.3
46.2
20.2
<0.001
Preoperative MCS
52.1
23.2
74.9
20.0
<0.001
Postoperative MCS73.918.854.122.4<0.001

BMI – Body mass index, ICU – Intensive care unit, PCS – Physical component summary, MCS – Mental component summary.

Table 8

Multivariate analysis of influence of preoperative PCS and MCS scores on postoperative quality of life improvement

VariableRegression coefficientOdds ratioConfidence interval (95%)P value
Gender
 
 
 
0.3155
Age >70 years
 
 
 
0.1103
Type of surgery
 
 
 
0.1931
Preoperative PCS
0.026
1.03
1.00 – 1.05
0.0187
Preoperative MCS
0.022
1.02
0.997 – 1.00
0.0846
Constant- 4.415   

PCS – Preoperative physical component summary, MCS – Preoperative physical component summary; in brackets are P values for preoperative MCS status.

SF-36 differences in preoperative HRQOL between survivors and non-survivors. Characteristics of improvers and non-improvers group BMI – Body mass index, ICU – Intensive care unit, PCS – Physical component summary, MCS – Mental component summary. Multivariate analysis of influence of preoperative PCS and MCS scores on postoperative quality of life improvement PCS – Preoperative physical component summary, MCS – Preoperative physical component summary; in brackets are P values for preoperative MCS status.

Discussion

The main finding of our study is coming up from the multivariate analysis, where the given variables (age, gender, type of surgery, preoperative PCS and MCS) were tested on their influence on potential non-improvement of HRQOL after cardiac surgery. The multivariate analysis has demonstrated, that only the preoperative PCS and MCS status has influence on postoperative change in HRQOL after cardiac surgery. The highest risk of non-improvement in postoperative quality of life was found in patients with higher preoperative PCS and MCS scores. We have also found that non-survivors showed a significantly lower preoperative HRQOL than survivors. Rumsfeld et al. analyzed a set of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization and compared two components of the SF-36 questionnaire (mental and physical) in patients who survived and did not survive the first 6 months after surgery [26]. The results indicate that the preoperative health status was significantly different in the HRQOL of survivors and was the major determinant of change in quality of life following surgery. Factors presented as being associated with failure to achieve a better HRQOL outcome in the postoperative period include the following: one or more preoperative comorbidities and postoperative low cardiac output [27], low preoperative ejection fraction [28], preoperative ICU stay or perioperative complications [29], a higher dyspnea classification, experiencing a new cardiac arrhythmia during or after the surgery, higher pulmonary pressure, previous cardiac surgery, previous myocardial infarction, and manual occupation [14,30]. Based on these results we can conclude, that patients with distinctly low preoperative HRQOL status are also in very poor clinical conditions and the risk of death is increased. On the other hand, patients with high pre-surgical HRQOL don´t have much room for improvement and their surgery is more preventive in nature. The most frequent postoperative complications in the group of older patients were previously described as heart failure, dysrhythmia, postoperative bleeding, ventilation problems, neurophysical disorders, myocardial dysfunction, and renal failure [6]. In our study, there were also higher incidences of respiratory and urinary tract infections and higher numbers of red cell units given in the group of patients age >70 years. Engoren et al. describe the same situation between groups of septuagenarians and octogenarians, and they also report hospital costs 35% higher for the octogenarians because of postoperative complications [11]. In another study, Dumbor et al. take into account the economic dimension and refer to several factors which increase hospital costs: high preoperative risk as determined by scoring systems, unintended procedures, the total red cell units used, invasive monitoring, prolonged postoperative ventilation, length of stay in ICU, incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and infection, and overall length of hospital stay. According to their calculations, the costs of treatment for patients age >70 years are 91% higher than are those for patients age ≤70 years [31]. Frelich et al. mention 15% higher hospital costs in patients age >70 years [6]. In the present situation, when the economic view on medical care is projecting more and more into everyday practice, our efforts should be oriented toward these high-risk patients because most of the complications are related to preoperative status and can be reduced through careful preoperative conditioning, gentle operating techniques, and appropriate postoperative care. In cardiac surgery, as in other fields, there continue to be developed new operating methods (e.g., minimally invasive) that are directed to older patients and which decrease the risk of postoperative complications and mortality while also reducing economic costs [32]. The HRQOL improves early after cardiac operations an remains relatively constant in the long term even after three years [33], what makes the period of one year after surgery sufficient for HRQOL observation. Despite the higher incidence of complications in the older group, we have found no difference in postoperative HRQOL between the groups age ≤70 years and >70 years except Bodily pain, which improved more in the older group. Same result was also described by the group of Gjeilo [34]. We observed relatively higher values of preoperative SF-36 scores for HRQOL in younger patients, but the differences between preoperative and postoperative SF-36 scores were greater in the older group. This could lead to the conclusion that older patients obtain relatively greater benefit from cardiac surgery than do younger patients in the period of one year after surgery, when most of the postoperative complications have been resolved. Some of the earlier studies using the SF-36 questionnaire have presented only summaries of the SF-36 scores. For example, they report changes in physical health status (derived from physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health) and mental health status (derived from vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health) [28,29]. In contrast, we have identified the changes in each of the 8 domains of HRQOL and have thus been able to give a more detailed view of the patient’s quality of life. We have used summaries of the SF-36 only in the multivariate analysis, which, in our opinion, is a better and more convenient tool for use as a predictor of postoperative course. We should comment also on the limitations of this study. These are mainly attributable to the size of the study population (310 patients) and the follow-up period (1 year). Nevertheless, we believe that this study can be the basis for additional research which could prove our conclusions and provide a stronger tool for identifying older people who are likely to experience HRQOL improvement after cardiac surgery. During the study period none of the operative techniques were changed, and that could probably have reduced the potential bias of our longitudinal sample.

Conclusions

In our opinion, the preoperative HRQOL assessment should be an important part of the preoperative examination, especially in the high-risk patients. Our findings lead us to conclude that older patients with relatively higher cardiac operative risk have lower preoperative HRQOL, but they are more likely to exhibit significant improvement in HRQOL postoperatively. The group of patients age >70 years had more preoperative comorbidities and higher prevalence of postoperative complications, but there was no significant difference in HRQOL in comparison with the younger group of patients 1 year after surgery (except bodily pain domain, which improved more in the older group), which was the main finding of this study. If we are able to offer these patients more gentle operative techniques and appropriate postoperative care, then we can achieve not only significant reduction in the number of postoperative complications and mortality but also improvement in their HRQOL.

Abbreviations

HRQOL: Health-related quality of life; ICU: Intensive care unit; SF-36: Short form 36; CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; PCS: Physical component summary; MCS: Mental component summary.

Competing interests

Financial competing interests In the past five years, I have not received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from any organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future. I do not hold any shares or other securities in any organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future. I do not hold and I am not currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the manuscript. I have not received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript. I I do not have other financial competing interests. Non-financial competing interests There are no non-financial competing interests (political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual, commercial or any other) to declare in relation to this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

VK made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, as well as analysis and interpretation of data. AM made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, as well as analysis and interpretation of data. MK made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, as well as analysis and interpretation of data. JČ has been involved in drafting and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. AB has been involved in drafting and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. LP has been involved in drafting and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. VA has been involved in drafting and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

The authors are interested in issues of senior-age care in cardiac surgery. In their everyday practice they are striving to improve preoperative conditioning, surgical techniques and postoperative care in order to minimize operative risk for older patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
  28 in total

1.  Cardiac surgery in octogenarians; peri-operative outcome and long-term results.

Authors:  P Kolh; A Kerzmann; L Lahaye; P Gerard; R Limet
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  A systematic review on the quality of life benefits after aortic valve replacement in the elderly.

Authors:  Leonard Shan; Akshat Saxena; Ross McMahon; Andrew Wilson; Andrew Newcomb
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in one hundred consecutive octogenarian patients. A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  W Ko; K H Krieger; W D Lazenby; Y T Shin; M Goldstein; R Lazzaro; O W Isom
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Clinical validation of a quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patients.

Authors:  P Marquis; C Fayol; J E Joire
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Improvements in health-related quality of life before and after isolated cardiac operations.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; Richard Lee; Haris Subačius; S Chris Malaisrie; Edwin C McGee; Jane Kruse; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Quality of life after open-heart surgery in patients over 75 years old.

Authors:  S Chocron; N Rude; A Dussaucy; A Leplege; F Clement; K Alwan; J F Viel; J P Etievent
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Does the noise of mechanical heart valve prostheses affect quality of life as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire?

Authors:  Heinrich Koertke; Annette Hoffmann-Koch; Dietmar Boethig; Kazutomo Minami; Thomas Breymann; Mahmoud El-Arousy; Dirk Seifert; Reiner Koerfer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Quality of life in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and its predictors: importance of the autonomic nervous system.

Authors:  M P van den Berg; R J Hassink; A E Tuinenburg; E F van Sonderen; J D Lefrandt; P J de Kam; I C van Gelder; A J Smit; R Sanderman; H J Crijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Customized Prediction of Short Length of Stay Following Elective Cardiac Surgery in Elderly Patients Using a Genetic Algorithm.

Authors:  Joon Lee; Sapna Govindan; Leo A Celi; Kamal R Khabbaz; Balachundhar Subramaniam
Journal:  World J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  Pulmonary function and health-related quality of life 1-year follow up after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth Westerdahl; Marcus Jonsson; Margareta Emtner
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Impact of marital status and comorbid disorders on health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ann Kristin Bjørnnes; Monica Parry; Ragnhild Falk; Judy Watt-Watson; Irene Lie; Marit Leegaard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Predictors of health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Sanders; Tracey Bowden; Nicholas Woolfe-Loftus; Mandeep Sekhon; Leanne M Aitken
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Long-term quality of life and posttraumatic stress following elective cardiac surgery: preliminary findings of a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Daiva Gražulytė; Evaldas Kazlauskas; Ieva Norkienė; Smiltė Kolevinskaitė; Greta Kezytė; Indrė Urbanavičiūtė; Akvilė Sabestinaitė; Gintarė Korsakaitė; Paulina Želvienė; Donata Ringaitienė; Gintarė Šostakaitė; Jūratė Šipylaitė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2019

5.  ADL and IADL Following Open-Heart Surgery: The Role of a Character Strength Factor and Preoperative Medical Comorbidities.

Authors:  Amy L Ai; Frank D Fincham; Henry Carretta
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  Association between self-perceived pain sensitivity and pain intensity after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ann Kristin Bjørnnes; Irene Lie; Monica Parry; Ragnhild Falk; Marit Leegaard; Tone Rustøen; Berit Taraldsen Valeberg
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Quality of life after coronary bypass: a multicentre study of routinely collected health data in the Netherlands†.

Authors:  Fredrike Blokzijl; Saskia Houterman; Bart H M van Straten; Edgar Daeter; George J Brandon Bravo Bruinsma; Willem Dieperink; Michiel F Reneman; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst; Massimo A Mariani
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  Evaluating treatment-specific post-discharge quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness of TAVR and SAVR: Current practice & future directions.

Authors:  Maximilian A Fliegner; Devraj Sukul; Michael P Thompson; Nirav J Shah; Reza Soroushmehr; Jeffrey S McCullough; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-09-06

9.  Effect of physiotherapy on quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized study.

Authors:  Mohammad Zolfaghari; Seyyed Jalil Mirhosseini; Maryam Baghbeheshti; Alireza Afshani; Shadrooz Moazzam; Allahyar Golabchi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 10.  Effects of Supervised Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes on Quality of Life among Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  María Mansilla-Chacón; José L Gómez-Urquiza; María Begoña Martos-Cabrera; Luis Albendín-García; José L Romero-Béjar; Guillermo A Cañadas-De La Fuente; Nora Suleiman-Martos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.