Literature DB >> 24618199

The evaluation of the failed shoulder arthroplasty.

Brett P Wiater1, James E Moravek2, J Michael Wiater3.   

Abstract

As the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty continues to rise, the orthopedic shoulder surgeon will be increasingly faced with the difficult problem of evaluating a failed shoulder arthroplasty. The patient is usually dissatisfied with the outcome of the previous arthroplasty as a result of pain, but may complain of poor function due to limited range of motion or instability. A thorough and systematic approach is necessary so that the most appropriate treatment pathway can be initiated. A comprehensive history and physical examination are the first steps in the evaluation. Diagnostic studies are numerous and include laboratory values, plain radiography, computed tomography, ultrasound imaging, joint aspiration, nuclear scans, and electromyography. Common causes of early pain after shoulder arthroplasty include technical issues related to the surgery, such as malposition or improper sizing of the prosthesis, periprosthetic infection, neurologic injury, and complex regional pain syndrome. Pain presenting after a symptom-free interval may be related to chronic periprosthetic infection, component wear and loosening, glenoid erosion, rotator cuff degeneration, and fracture. Poor range of motion may result from inadequate postoperative rehabilitation, implant-related factors, and heterotopic ossification. Instability is generally caused by rotator cuff deficiency and implant-related factors. Unfortunately, determining the cause of a failed shoulder arthroplasty can be difficult, and in many situations, the source of pain and disability is multifactorial.
Copyright © 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder arthroplasty; diagnosis; failed shoulder replacement; unsatisfactory outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24618199     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  Management of complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hithem Rahmi; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Ten questions on prosthetic shoulder infection.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Pinder; Joshua Cy Ong; R Stephen Bale; Ian A Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-03-08

3.  Blinded Ultrasound Examination of the Subscapularis Following Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael P O'Malley; Cameron Kia; Alex G Dukas; Mark Cote; Harlan Stock; Lawrence Savoy; Brian A Tinsley; Farhang Alaee; Augustus D Mazzocca; Kevin P Shea
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2019-02-25

4.  Complex Region Pain Syndrome Following Shoulder Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin M Magone; Erel Ben-Ari; Jacques H Hacquebord; Mandeep S Virk
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-15

5.  Appropriate Use Criteria for the Use of Nuclear Medicine in Musculoskeletal Infection Imaging.

Authors:  Christopher Palestro; Alicia Clark; Erin Grady; Sherif Heiba; Ora Israel; Alan Klitzke; Charito Love; Mike Sathekge; S Ted Treves; Tracy L Yarbrough
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 11.082

6.  Quantitative assessment and characterization of glenoid bone loss in a spectrum of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D J Lombardo; J Khan; B Prey; L Zhang; G R Petersen-Fitts; V J Sabesan
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-03

7.  Wear performance of inverted non-conforming bearings in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Banci; Alessio Meoli; Martin Hintner; Hans Rudolf Bloch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-02-07

8.  Persistent pain is common 1-2 years after shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Karen T Bjørnholdt; Birgitte Brandsborg; Kjeld Søballe; Lone Nikolajsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Conversion of Hemiarthroplasty to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Humeral Stem Retention.

Authors:  Falk Reuther; Ulrich Irlenbusch; Max J Kääb; Georges Kohut
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs.

Authors:  Nicolai Sandau; Stig Brorson; Bo S Olsen; Anne Kathrine Sørensen; Steen L Jensen; Kim Schantz; Janne Ovesen; Jeppe V Rasmussen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.