Literature DB >> 24618198

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: clinical and radiologic outcomes according to fracture type.

Hoon-Sang Sohn1, Sang-Jin Shin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic outcomes, according to fracture type, of proximal humeral fractures treated by the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 85 patients with proximal humeral fractures who were treated by the MIPO technique, 62 were evaluated: 27 with 2-part fractures, 24 with 3-part fractures, and 11 with 4-part fractures. An additional inferomedial screw or fibular allograft was used when severe medial cortical comminution was found in the proximal humerus. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated during the follow-up of 37 months.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the Constant scores of patients with 4-part fractures compared with those with 3-part fractures (P = .039). The neck-shaft angle in 4-part fractures (121° ± 3°) at final follow-up was significantly lower compared with other fracture types (2-part: 129° ± 9°, P = .036; 3-part: 129° ± 2°, P = .031). Complication rates (72.7%) of 4-part fractures were significantly higher than with other fracture types (2-part, 7.4%; 3-part, 20.8%; P = .001). Sixteen fractures were fixed with an additional inferomedial screw, and 3 patients had insertion of a fibular allograft.
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes were obtained by the MIPO technique in proximal humeral fractures. In addition, medial cortical support can be performed with an inferomedial screw or fibular allograft in the MIPO technique. However, the MIPO technique for 4-part fractures showed relatively inferior outcomes compared with 2- and 3-part fractures. Conversion to open plating is also considered if adequate reduction, that is, a neck-shaft angle >120°, is not able to be obtained in the MIPO technique for 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus.
Copyright © 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIPO; fracture type; outcomes; proximal humeral fractures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24618198     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  14 in total

1.  Fracture of the proximal humerus with disruption of the tendon of the pectoralis major.

Authors:  Bart M Berghs; Alexander Van Tongel; Thomas De Bo; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

2.  [Application of the modified internal fixation method of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis in treatment of proximal humeral fracture].

Authors:  B C Liu; Z W Yang; F Zhou; H Q Ji; Z S Zhang; Y Guo; Y Tian
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-04-18

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dualplate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures without medial support.

Authors:  Yu He; Yaoshen Zhang; Yan Wang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 4.  Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

Authors:  Venkat Kavuri; Blake Bowden; Neil Kumar; Doug Cerynik
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Study Describing Principles and Advantages of the Technique.

Authors:  Riccardo Luigi Alberio; Matteo Del Re; Federico Alberto Grassi
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-06-03

6.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with PHILOS plate for proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Uğur Gönç; Mesut Atabek; Kürşat Teker; Altuğ Tanrıöver
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Serial changes in the head-shaft angle of proximal humeral fractures treated by placing locking plates: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ji-Qi Wang; Bing-Jie Jiang; Wei-Jun Guo; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  A scoping review of biomechanical testing for proximal humerus fracture implants.

Authors:  David Cruickshank; Kelly A Lefaivre; Herman Johal; Norma J MacIntyre; Sheila A Sprague; Taryn Scott; Pierre Guy; Peter A Cripton; Michael McKee; Mohit Bhandari; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Modified minimally invasive approach and intra-osseous portal for three-part proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Zhuo Zhang; Gongzi Zhang; Ye Peng; Xiang Wang; Hui Guo; Wei Zhang; Peifu Tang; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Using a Screw Compression Method for Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Ko; Jae-Ryong Cha; Chae Chil Lee; Yong Tae Joo; Kyeong Su Eom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.