BACKGROUND: Several patient-reported outcome measurements are used to measure functional outcome after treatment of meniscal injuries. However, for comparison of study results, there is a need for a uniform and standardized approach of measuring functional outcome. Selection of the instrument should be based on the quality of its measurement properties, and only the best instrument can be justified to be used. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine and compare the measurement properties of the Dutch-language versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) in a homogeneous group of patients with meniscal tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (design); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients on the waiting list for meniscal surgery and patients between 6 weeks and 6 months after meniscal surgery were included (n = 75). Patients were excluded if they received an arthroplasty or had surgery on the anterior cruciate ligament. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), measurement error (SEM), smallest detectable difference (SDD), content validity, construct validity (factor analysis and hypothesis testing), and floor and ceiling effects were determined. RESULTS: Results for the IKDC, KOOS dimensions, and WOMAC dimensions, respectively, were as follows: Cronbach alpha = .90, .72-.95, and .84-.95; ICC = 0.93, 0.84-0.89, and 0.77-0.89; SEM = 5.3, 7.0-12.6, and 7.3-12.2; SDD = 14.6, 19.4-35.0, and 20.2-33.9; hypotheses testing confirmation = 100%, 86%, and 85%. Floor effects within the SDD from the minimum score were found for the KOOS Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life dimensions. Ceiling effects within the SDD from the maximum score were found for the KOOS Activities of Daily Living and for all WOMAC dimensions. CONCLUSION: The IKDC showed the best performance on all measurement properties, implying that the IKDC, rather than the KOOS or WOMAC, should be used to assess functional outcome in patients with meniscal tears.
BACKGROUND: Several patient-reported outcome measurements are used to measure functional outcome after treatment of meniscal injuries. However, for comparison of study results, there is a need for a uniform and standardized approach of measuring functional outcome. Selection of the instrument should be based on the quality of its measurement properties, and only the best instrument can be justified to be used. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine and compare the measurement properties of the Dutch-language versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) in a homogeneous group of patients with meniscal tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (design); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS:Patients on the waiting list for meniscal surgery and patients between 6 weeks and 6 months after meniscal surgery were included (n = 75). Patients were excluded if they received an arthroplasty or had surgery on the anterior cruciate ligament. Internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), measurement error (SEM), smallest detectable difference (SDD), content validity, construct validity (factor analysis and hypothesis testing), and floor and ceiling effects were determined. RESULTS: Results for the IKDC, KOOS dimensions, and WOMAC dimensions, respectively, were as follows: Cronbach alpha = .90, .72-.95, and .84-.95; ICC = 0.93, 0.84-0.89, and 0.77-0.89; SEM = 5.3, 7.0-12.6, and 7.3-12.2; SDD = 14.6, 19.4-35.0, and 20.2-33.9; hypotheses testing confirmation = 100%, 86%, and 85%. Floor effects within the SDD from the minimum score were found for the KOOS Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life dimensions. Ceiling effects within the SDD from the maximum score were found for the KOOS Activities of Daily Living and for all WOMAC dimensions. CONCLUSION: The IKDC showed the best performance on all measurement properties, implying that the IKDC, rather than the KOOS or WOMAC, should be used to assess functional outcome in patients with meniscal tears.
Authors: Poliane T S Lage; Luciana A C Machado; Sandhi M Barreto; Roberta C de Figueiredo; Rosa W Telles Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Aaron J Krych; Patrick J Reardon; Nick R Johnson; Rohith Mohan; Logan Peter; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Joshua P Castle; Lafi S Khalil; Muhammad J Abbas; Stephanie DeBolle; Marissa Tandron; Austin G Cross; Guillermo A Rodriguez; Kelechi R Okoroha Journal: J Orthop Date: 2022-04-14
Authors: Kaitlin G Rabe; Tyler J Stockman; Andrew M Kern; Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein; Leena Sharma; John A Lynch; Michael C Nevitt; Donald D Anderson; Neil A Segal Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Victor A van de Graaf; Julia C A Noorduyn; Nienke W Willigenburg; Ise K Butter; Arthur de Gast; Ben W Mol; Daniel B F Saris; Jos W R Twisk; Rudolf W Poolman Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Brian Pietrosimone; Christopher Kuenze; Joseph M Hart; Charles Thigpen; Adam S Lepley; J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua; Terry Grindstaff; Hope Davis; David Bell Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 4.342