| Literature DB >> 24616709 |
Robert Kromer1, Nermin Serbecic1, Lucrezia Hausner2, Lutz Froelich2, Fahmy Aboul-Enein3, Sven C Beutelspacher1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Our aim is to examine the clinical value of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis OCT) to detect retinal nerve fibre layer defects in patients with clinically defined Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; dementia; optical coherence tomography; retinal nerve fiber layer; retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
Year: 2014 PMID: 24616709 PMCID: PMC3934110 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Comparison of the different sectors around the optic disk regarding the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.
| Patient | Mean | NS | NI | TI | T | TS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90.0 ± 8.5 | 75.0 ± 1.4 | 46.0 ± 9.9 | 111.5 ± 21.9 | 143.5 ± 9.2 | 73.0 ± 1.4 | 153.0 ± 17.0 |
| 2 | 102.0 ± 8.5 | 105.5 ± 3.5 | 60.5 ± 6.4 | 112.0 ± 7.1 | 166.5 ± 13.4 | 77.5 ± 17.7 | 157.5 ± 0.7 |
| 3 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 99.0 ± 4.2 | 99.5 ± 0.7 | 127.5 ± 2.1 | 130.5 ± 2.1 | 61.5 ± 0.7 | 122.5 ± 0.7 |
| 4 | 99.0 | 124.0 | 92.0 | 127.0 | 134.0 | 58.0 | 108.0 |
| 5 | 110.0 ± 5.7 | 116.5 ± 4.9 | 81.0 ± 5.7 | 129.0 ± 4.2 | 148.5 ± 2.1 | 86.5 ± 13.4 | 151.0 ± 5.7 |
| 6 | 95.5 ± 4.9 | 110.5 ± 16.3 | 66.0 ± 2.8 | 91.5 ± 21.9 | 143.5 ± 23.3 | 68.0 ± 1.4 | 148.5 ± 14.8 |
| 7 | 108.0 ± 1.4 | 111.5 ± 16.3 | 87.0 ± 0.0 | 125.5 ± 4.9 | 147.5 ± 3.5 | 77.5 ± 4.9 | 139.0 ± 0.0 |
| 8 | 85.0 ± 1.4 | 85.5 ± 4.9 | 55.0 ± 1.4 | 73.0 ± 5.7 | 129.0 ± 9.9 | 81.5 ± 20.5 | 118.5 ± 7.8 |
| 9 | 90.5 ± 2.1 | 91.5 ± 7.8 | 67.0 ± 2.8 | 80.5 ± 2.1 | 147.0 ± 4.2 | 66.0 ± 0.0 | 139.0 ± 11.3 |
| 10 | 93.0 ± 0.0 | 110.0 ± 0.0 | 66.5 ± 0.7 | 124.0 ± 5.7 | 141.5 ± 7.8 | 59.5 ± 0.7 | 114.5 ± 0.7 |
| 11 | 91.5 ± 9.2 | 115.5 ± 17.7 | 65.0 ± 8.5 | 119.0 ± 5.7 | 119.0 ± 8.5 | 60.0 ± 5.7 | 126.0 ± 26.9 |
| 12 | 113.0 | 118.0 | 99.0 | 155.0 | 153.0 | 69.0 | 145.0 |
| 13 | 94.0 ± 0.0 | 118.0 ± 0.0 | 58.5 ± 0.7 | 82.0 ± 1.4 | 143.5 ± 3.5 | 81.0 ± 4.2 | 128.5 ± 0.7 |
| 14 | 97.5 ± 4.9 | 78.5 ± 10.6 | 61.5 ± 12 | 109.0 ± 11.3 | 154.5 ± 7.8 | 94.5 ± 3.5 | 124.5 ± 10.6 |
| 15 | 87.0 ± 0.0 | 79.5 ± 3.5 | 75.5 ± 4.9 | 91.0 ± 2.8 | 116.5 ± 9.2 | 83.0 ± 5.7 | 93.0 ± 11.3 |
| 16 | 103.0 ± 1.4 | 120.5 ± 12 | 79.5 ± 3.5 | 137.5 ± 7.8 | 134.0 ± 0.0 | 67.5 ± 0.7 | 139.0 ± 1.4 |
| 17 | 91.0 ± 0.0 | 92.0 ± 0.0 | 71.5 ± 3.5 | 112.5 ± 7.8 | 134.0 ± 2.8 | 61.0 ± 7.1 | 126.0 ± 1.4 |
| 18 | 136.5 ± 27.6 | 145.0 ± 53.7 | 117.5 ± 20.5 | 179.0 ± 12.0 | 204.0 ± 6.4 | 81.5 ± 20.5 | 165.5 ± 65.1 |
| 19 | 125.5 ± 1.4 | 136.5 ± 4.2 | 90.0 ± 10.6 | 145.5 ± 12.7 | 182.0 ± 3.5 | 93.5 ± 5.7 | 173.5 ± 7.1 |
| 20 | 137.0 ± 2.8 | 149.5 ± 7.8 | 102.0 ± 6.4 | 139.5 ± 10.6 | 194.5 ± 1.4 | 103.5 ± 2.1 | 200.5 ± 5,7 |
| 21 | 120.0 ± 2.1 | 170.5 ± 15.6 | 98.5 ± 1.4 | 130.5 ± 14.8 | 151.5 ± 4.2 | 78.0 ± 2.1 | 154.0 ± 12.0 |
| 22 | 141.0 ± 0.0 | 151.5 ± 17.0 | 108.0 ± 2.1 | 162.5 ± 15.6 | 198.0 ± 10.6 | 98.0 ± 5.7 | 204.5 ± 16.3 |
| Controls | 101.8 ± 10.7 | 122.8 ± 28.1 | 79.0 ± 12.8 | 107.5 ± 27.2 | 138.4 ± 19.9 | 74.3 ± 11.8 | 139.3 ± 23.3 |
| Heidelberg spectralis values (P < 0.01) | 94.5 ± 20.5 | 71.5 ± 33.5 | 102.0 ± 44.0 | 103.0 ± 52.0 | 135.0 ± 43.0 | 69.5 ± 27.5 | 129.0 ± 38.0 |
The table shows the mean of both eyes and SD interval for every AD patient (in case the patient has only one eye SD is not presented). At the bottom of the table means of the control patients as well the normative data of the manufacture (kindly provided) are viewed. The different sectors are labeled as follows: global (G), nasal superior (NS), nasal (N), nasal inferior (NI), temporal inferior (TI), temporal (T), and temporal superior (TS).
Figure 1Comparison of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in different peripapillary sectors: each left column represents the patient with AD (AD), while the right columns show the values of the control group (control). The different sectors are labeled as follows: global (G), nasal superior (NS), nasal (N), nasal inferior (NI), temporal inferior (TI), temporal (T), and temporal superior (TS). Significant differences (with Bonferroni correction) were only registered in the nasal superior sector (P < 0.0001), indicated as ***.
Figure 2Presentation of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values of the AD eyes compared to the mean of the control eyes. The different sectors are labeled as follows: global (G, B1), nasal superior (NS, B2), nasal (N, B3), nasal inferior (NI, B4), temporal inferior (TI, B5), temporal (T, B6), and temporal superior (TS, B7). A circle represents the AD eyes. This way, we were able to identify patients with an RNFL increase or atrophy. We found 67 abnormal sectors and 32 eyes with pathologic RNFLT (out of 42 eyes).
Comparison of the different sectors around the optic disk regarding the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.
| Multiple comparison post test | Mean diff. | P-value | 95% CI of difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G_AD versus G_control | −7.553 | 1.874 | >0.05 | −18.43 to 3.328 |
| NS_AD versus NS_control* | −21.79 | 5.407 | <0.0001 | −32.67 to −10.91 |
| N_AD versus N_control | −8.594 | 2.132 | >0.05 | −19.47 to 2.287 |
| NI_AD versus NI_control | 0.8693 | 0.2157 | >0.05 | −10.01 to 11.75 |
| TI_AD versus TI_control | −2.276 | 0.5646 | >0.05 | −13.16 to 8.605 |
| T_AD versus T_control | −4.875 | 1.210 | >0.05 | −15.76 to 6.006 |
| TS_AD versus TS_control | −11.28 | 2.798 | 0.0349 | −22.16 to −0.3972 |
The table shows the mean difference (Mean diff.), the .
Figure 3Comparison of the cup-to-disk ratio (CD-ratio) between AD patients (AD) and controls (control) with a significant difference (. The mean CD-ratio of AD patients was 0.396, the one of the control patients 0.359.
Comparison of the different sectors around the optic disk regarding the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in the eyes of AD patients.
| Patient | MMSE | Clinical dementia rating | Disease duration (months) | Cup-to-disk ratio (left eye first) | SD-OCT calculations | Age- and sex-matched calculations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left eye | Right eye | Left eye | Right eye | |||||
| 1 | 17 | 2 | 3.2 | 0.40, 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 2 Atrophic | 2 Atrophic |
| 2 | 27 | 1 | 2.6 | 0,41, 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 1 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| 3 | 20 | 2 | 6.9 | 0.40, 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 1 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| 4 | 23 | 1 | 3 | 0.44, – | 0 | 0 | 2 Atrophic | – |
| 5 | 25 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.44, 0.45 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 23 | 1 | 7.4 | 0.43, 0.40 | 0 | 0 | 1 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| 7 | 25 | 1 | 11 | 0.38, 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 29 | 0.5 | 6.3 | 0.44, 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 3 Atrophic | 4 Atrophic |
| 9 | 19 | 2 | 1.2 | 0.35, 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 2 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| 10 | 20 | 2 | 18.3 | 0.33, 0.28 | 0 | 0 | 2 Atrophic | 3 Atrophic |
| 11 | 27 | 0.5 | 8.7 | 0.40, 0.40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 Atrophic |
| 12 | 30 | 0,5 | 32 | –, 0.35 | – | 0 | – | 0 |
| 13 | 25 | 0.5 | 32.2 | 0.33, 0.40 | 0 | 1 Swollen | 1 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| 14 | 29 | 0.5 | 22.5 | 0.35, 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 1 Atrophic | 2 Atrophic |
| 15 | 28 | 0.5 | 6.5 | 0.33, 0.31 | 0 | 1 Atrophic | 3 Atrophic | 2 Atrophic |
| 16 | 29 | 0.5 | 24.5 | 0.35, 0.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 21 | 1 | 8.5 | 0.45, 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 2 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| 18 | 21 | 1 | 8.0 | 0.44, 0.44 | 4 Atrophic | 0 | 4 Atrophic | 0 |
| 19 | 14 | 2 | 6.6 | 0.37, 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 4 Atrophic | 2 Atrophic |
| 20 | 21 | 2 | 7.3 | 0.38, 0.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 Atrophic |
| 21 | 13 | 2 | 63.3 | 0.35, 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 3 Atrophic | 5 Atrophic |
| 22 | 11 | 2 | 7.9 | 0.33, 0.40 | 0 | 0 | 1 Atrophic | 1 Atrophic |
| Abnormal eyes | 1 | 2 | 16 | 16 | ||||
| Abnormal sectors | 4 | 2 | 33 | 34 | ||||
The first column shows the patient number, the second displays the reached points of the MMSE, the third column the Clinical Dementia Rating score, the fourth the months since diagnosis and the fifth the cup-to-disk ratio. The two blocks following show the data as obtained from the SD-OCT-based internal database (this is plotted for left and right eye). This was put into contrast to our calculations using age- and sex-matched controls (the two following blocks). At the bottom of this table, the count of the pathologic peripapillary sectors as well as eyes is shown. Thus the SD-OCT’s internal database was not able to detect 61 abnormal sectors and 29 eyes with pathologic RNFLT compared to our age- and sex-matched based model.