| Literature DB >> 24616645 |
Selcuk Kara1, Baran Gencer1, Turan Karaca2, Hasan Ali Tufan1, Sedat Arikan1, Ismail Ersan1, Ihsan Karaboga2, Volkan Hanci3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hesperetin and naringenin are naturally common flavonoids reported to have antioxidative effects. This study was performed to investigate whether either hesperetin or naringenin has a protective effect against apoptosis on retinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24616645 PMCID: PMC3925573 DOI: 10.1155/2014/797824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Thickness of the rat's retina (μm).
| GCL | IPL | INL | OPL | ONL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 21.8 ± 5.2 | 50.4 ± 6.4 | 25.2 ± 5.1 | 12.1 ± 1.8 | 50 ± 9.8 |
| Sham | 13.4 ± 2.6* | 20.2 ± 3.9* | 15.6 ± 2.5* | 8.6 ± 2.0* | 40 ± 6.4* |
| Solvent | 11.3 ± 4.1* | 21.3 ± 3.5* | 16.2 ± 4.2* | 8.1 ± 2.1* | 42 ± 8.7* |
| Hesperetin treatment | 9.5 ± 3.1** | 20.7 ± 5.4* | 17.4 ± 3.7* | 8.5 ± 1.7* | 32 ± 6.3** |
| Naringenin treatment | 12.2 ± 3.1* | 25.4 ± 2.7*** | 24.2 ± 1.8# | 9.5 ± 1.4*** | 47.6 ± 3.4# |
GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer.
*P < 0.05: comparison to control; **P < 0.05: comparison to control, sham, solvent, and naringenin groups; ***P < 0.05: comparison to control, sham, solvent, and hesperetin treatment groups; # P < 0.05: comparison to sham, solvent groups, and hesperetin treatment groups.
Figure 1(a) In controls, normal retina architecture was seen; (b) after ischemic injury, severe retinal damage was noted; (c) ischemic injury plus DMSO group, observed reduction in retinal thickness and injuries; (d and e) there was an improvement in the retinal structure in hesperetin-treated and naringenin-treated ischemic rats, respectively. Retina thickness had increased significantly after in the hesperetin- and naringenin-treated compared to ischemic rats. Haematoxylin and eosin staining (×400).
Number of tunel positive cells in the retina.
| Control | Sham | Solvent group | Hesperetin group | Naringenin group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INL | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 465.28 ± 85.7a | 392 ± 62.1b | 170.24 ± 42.4c | 149.12 ± 25.8c,d |
| ONL | 0 ± 0 | 188.16 ± 36.8a | 153 ± 18.8b | 77.44 ± 16.7c | 69.76 ± 12.7c,d |
INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer.
a P < 0.0001: comparison to control; b P < 0.001: comparison to control and sham groups; c P < 0.005: comparison to control, sham, and solvent groups; d P < 0.05: comparison to hesperetin treatment group.
Figure 2Caspase 3. (a) Control group, a few caspase 3-positive cells; (b) ischemic group; (c) ischemic injury plus DMSO group; (d) ischemia plus hesperetin-treated group, and (e) ischemia plus naringenin-treated group. At the end of the experiment, fewer caspase 3-positive cells were noted in the hesperetin- and naringenin-treated groups than those in the ischemic retinal cells. Arrows: Caspase 3-positive cells. Immunoperoxidase, hematoxylin counterstain (×400).
Number of caspase-3 positive cells in the retina.
| Control | Sham | Solvent group | Hesperetin group | Naringenin group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INL | 13.44 ± 4.2 | 520.32 ± 65.7a | 491 ± 74.9a | 385.92 ± 72.6b | 338.56 ± 32.8b |
| ONL | 2.56 ± 0.4 | 68.48 ± 12.7a | 46.2 ± 14.2c | 38.4 ± 8.1b | 39.56 ± 9.5b |
INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer.
a P < 0.0001: comparison to control; b P < 0.001: comparison to control, sham, and solvent groups; c P < 0.001: comparison to control and sham.
Figure 3Tunel staining. Representative photographs of tunel staining in control (a), ischemic (b), ischemic injury plus DMSO group (c), ischemic injury treated with hesperetin group (d), and ischemic injury treated with naringenin group in rat retina (e). Positive cells of tunel staining were increased significantly in ischemic rats. However, treatment with hesperetin and naringenin markedly reduced the number of retinal cell apoptosis, respectively. Arrows: tunel-positive cells (×400).