Literature DB >> 24616329

Implementing family health history risk stratification in primary care: impact of guideline criteria on populations and resource demand.

Lori A Orlando, R Ryanne Wu, Chris Beadles, Tiffany Himmel, Adam H Buchanan, Karen P Powell, Elizabeth R Hauser, Vincent C Henrich, Geoffrey S Ginsburg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Genomic Medicine Model aims to facilitate patient engagement, patient/provider education of genomics/personalized medicine, and uptake of risk-stratified evidence-based prevention guidelines using MeTree, a patient-facing family health history (FHH) collection and clinical decision support (CDS) program. Here we report the number of increased risk (above population-level risk) patients identified for breast/ovarian cancer, colon cancer, hereditary syndrome risk, and thrombosis; the prevalence of FHH elements triggering increased-risk status; and the resources needed to manage their risk. STUDY
DESIGN: hybrid implementation-effectiveness study of adults with upcoming well-visits in 2 primary care practices in Greensboro, NC. PARTICIPANTS: 1,184, mean age = 58.8, female = 58% (N = 694), non-white = 20% (N = 215). Increased Risk: 44% (N = 523). RECOMMENDATIONS: genetic counseling = 26% (N = 308), breast MRI = 0.8% (N = 10), breast chemoprophylaxis = 5% (N = 58), early/frequent colonoscopies = 19% (N = 221), ovarian cancer screening referral = 1% (N = 14), thrombosis testing/counseling = 2.4% (N = 71). FHH elements: 8 FHH elements lead to 37.3% of the increased risk categorizations (by frequency): first-degree-relative (FDR) with polyps age ≥60 (7.1%, N = 85), three relatives with Lynch-related cancers (5.4%, N = 65), FDR with polyps age <60 (5.1%, N = 61), three relatives on same side of family with same cancer (4.9%, N = 59), Gail score ≥1.66% (4.9%, N = 58), two relatives with breast cancer (one ≤age 50) (4.1%, N = 49), one relative with breast cancer ≤age 40 (4.1%, N = 48), FDR with colon cancer age ≥60 (1.7%, N = 20). MeTree identifies a high percentage of individuals in the general primary care population needing non-routine risk management/prevention for the selected conditions. Implementing risk-stratification in primary care will likely increase demand for related-resources, particularly colon screening and GC. Understanding the prevalence of FHH elements helps predict resource needs and may aid in guideline development.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family history; health services; primary prevention; risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24616329     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  16 in total

1.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Flore Laforest; Pia Kirkegaard; Baljinder Mann; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A model for patient-direct screening and referral for familial cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristin B Niendorf; Melissa A Geller; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Timothy R Church; Anna Leininger; Angela Bakke; Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Personalized Multi-Condition Risk Assessment in Primary Care.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Heather J Baer; Katyuska Eibensteiner; Elissa V Klinger; Stella St Hubert; George Getty; Phyllis Brawarsky; E John Orav; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; David W Bates; Graham Colditz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Multi-source development of an integrated model for family health history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chen; Elizabeth W Carter; Tamara J Winden; Indra Neil Sarkar; Yan Wang; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Family health history: underused for actionable risk assessment.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; R Ryanne Wu; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Assessing family history of chronic disease in primary care: Prevalence, documentation, and appropriate screening.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Denise Campbell-Scherer; Joanne A Permaul; Jesse Myers; Donna P Manca; Christopher Meaney; Rahim Moineddin; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Effect of Sociodemographic Factors on Uptake of a Patient-Facing Information Technology Family Health History Risk Assessment Platform.

Authors:  R Ryanne Wu; Rachel A Myers; Adam H Buchanan; David Dimmock; Kimberly G Fulda; Irina V Haller; Susanne B Haga; Melissa L Harry; Catherine McCarty; Joan Neuner; Teji Rakhra-Burris; Nina Sperber; Corrine I Voils; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Effectiveness of interventions to identify and manage patients with familial cancer risk in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Siang Ing Lee; Mitesh Patel; Brittany Dutton; Stephen Weng; Jocelyn Luveta; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-05-06

Review 9.  Breast cancer epidemic in the early twenty-first century: evaluation of risk factors, cumulative questionnaires and recommendations for preventive measures.

Authors:  Olga Golubnitschaja; Manuel Debald; Kristina Yeghiazaryan; Walther Kuhn; Martin Pešta; Vincenzo Costigliola; Godfrey Grech
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-22

10.  Clinical utility of a Web-enabled risk-assessment and clinical decision support program.

Authors:  Lori A Orlando; R Ryanne Wu; Rachel A Myers; Adam H Buchanan; Vincent C Henrich; Elizabeth R Hauser; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.